All poems

宋 Song · 诗 Poem

题英烈王庙

On the Temple of the Heroic Prince (Wu Zixu)

张方平

Zhang Fangping

咏史historical 忠冤loyalty and injustice

固云志在修私怨，破郢其如不利吴。
由此夫差心遂侈，鸱夷岂得谓非辜。

Granted, his aim was to redress a private wrong; yet how could sacking Ying not harm Wu?
Thence Fuchai's heart grew arrogant and vain; how could the leather sack mean he was not wronged.

Listen

Meaning

The poet visits the temple of Wu Zixu and offers a balanced historical judgment. He admits Zixu's revenge was personal, yet notes that sacking Ying exhausted Wu and bred Fuchai's arrogance, leading to Zixu's unjust death in a leather sack. The poem weighs private vengeance against public loyalty and laments the common tragedy of the faithful suspected.

虽说伍子胥志在报复私怨，然破郢之举岂不也有损于吴国。由此夫差之心渐生骄侈，那鸱夷革囊中的子胥岂能说不是冤屈。

Appreciation

In twenty-eight characters the seven-character quatrain unfolds like a full historical essay through two turns. The first line concedes the private motive, the second blames the cost, the third reveals the consequence, the fourth mourns the injustice—linked by the four particles 'granted / yet / thence / how could.' The terse form gains the rise and fall of a written judgment, showing the Song quatrain's strength in argument.

【白话串讲】张方平题伍子胥庙：“固云志在修私怨，破郢其如不利吴”。“由此夫差心遂侈，鸱夷岂得谓非辜”——他写伍子胥破郢、夫差杀他的故事。【意象与手法】七绝以「两转」见力：一句认其私、二句斥其损、三句揭其祸、四句哀其冤。以「固云—其如—由此—岂得」四个虚词勾连四句，使史评有跌宕、有断案，短章而具一篇史论之起伏。【情感与主旨】主旨是谒庙史论：既平允承认子胥复仇带私怨、破郢不利吴，又推演破郢致夫差骄侈、终赐死沉江之冤，于「私义—公忠」张力与「忠而见疑」的普遍政治悲剧中寄慨。【名句点睛】「鸱夷岂得谓非辜」最见宋人史断，以实物收束冷评，把抽象之冤凝为革囊沉江的惨象，力透纸背。

Background

The Heroic Prince is Wu Zixu, a Spring and Autumn minister of Wu, later titled 'Heroic Prince,' worshipped in many temples. His father and brother were killed by King Ping of Chu; he fled to Wu, helped Helü sack Chu and whip the corpse in revenge, later warned Fuchai against Yue and was forced to suicide, his body in a leather sack sunk in the river, becoming the Qiantang tide god—a symbol of loyalty and injustice. Fangping's poem, inscribed at the temple, grapples with the tension between private revenge and public loyalty. 'Granted his aim was private' admits the motive; 'sacking Ying harmed Wu' notes the cost; 'Fuchai grew arrogant' and 'leather sack not wronged' link Zixu's death to Wu's fall. The title and worship grew from folk belief—the Qiantang tide was attached to Zixu's wrong, the people worshipped him as tide god, and the court conferred the title. Northern Song literati valued historical lessons; Fangping laments 'the faithful suspected, merit bringing calamity,' also hinting at the universal political tragedy of blunt honesty provoking jealousy. To read Zixu's arc from revenge hero to sunk-wrong ghost is to grasp these four lines as history.

英烈王即春秋吴国大夫伍子胥，后世封号「英烈王」，各地多立庙祀之（如钱塘江畔伍公庙）。伍子胥父兄为楚平王所杀，奔吴后助阖闾破楚、鞭尸复仇，后谏夫差拒越、勿许和，反被赐死，尸盛鸱夷革囊沉江，化为钱塘潮神，遂成忠冤双绝的文化符号。方平此诗题《题英烈王庙》，乃谒庙感怀之作，就子胥一生最纠结处下笔：复仇之「私怨」与谋国之「公忠」如何两全。诗中「固云志在修私怨」先承认其复仇动机带有私愤，「破郢其如不利吴」则指出破郢鞭尸虽快意，却也透支了吴国国力；「夫差心遂侈」「鸱夷非辜」更把子胥之死与吴亡勾连。子胥封王崇祀，实始于民间信仰之推波：唐宋以来，钱塘潮信与子胥沉江之冤相附会，百姓以「潮神」祀之，官府亦因忠烈而敕封，英烈王之号遂定。北宋士大夫重史鉴，方平借子胥庙发「忠而见疑、功反贾祸」之叹，亦暗含对「刚直招忌」这一普遍政治悲剧的感喟。读懂子胥由复仇英雄到沉江冤魂的悲剧脉络，方能体会此短章四句皆是史论。

Art

This seven-character quatrain works through 'two turns': line one concedes the private, two blames the cost, three reveals the peril, four mourns the wrong—twenty-eight characters with the rise and fall of a historical essay. First line 'granted his aim was private revenge' yields a step, admitting Zixu's motive carried personal anger—not prettified like common praise, showing the historian's fairness; second 'sacking Ying how not harm Wu' turns from private to state: sacking and whipping the corpse vented family hate yet puffed Wu's pride and drained its strength, harming Wu. Third 'thence Fuchai's heart grew arrogant' continues, pointing the fruit—Fuchai thereafter arrogant, planted the cause of ruin; last 'how could the leather sack mean not wronged' judges, returning to Zixu's wrong: having served the state, he was sunk in a sack—how say not wronged. Four lines unfold motive, fruit, chain, outcome; first two on sacking Ying's fault, last two on the gift-of-death's wrong—one right one wrong, one fruit one wrong, short yet strict as history. In phrasing, four lines linked by 'granted / yet / thence / how could,' forming a 'yield-turn-continue-judge' logic chain; amid the particles' turning, the historical judgment gains rise and fall, a verdict—the short quatrain thus gains an essay's rise and fall. A seven-character quatrain achieving such dense historical judgment shows Fangping's skill of putting argument into the form, a clear case of Song quatrains 'winning by meaning.'

此诗七言绝句，章法以「两转」见力：一句认其私、二句斥其损、三句揭其祸、四句哀其冤，二十八字而具一篇史论之起伏。首句「固云志在修私怨」以「固云」二字先退一步，承认子胥复仇本带私愤——不似俗论一味美化，落笔便见史家公允；次句「破郢其如不利吴」以「其如」反诘，由私怨转到国事：破郢鞭尸虽雪家仇，却也骄吴之心、耗吴之力，于吴不利。第三句「由此夫差心遂侈」紧承，点出破郢之果——夫差由此骄侈，埋亡国之因；末句「鸱夷岂得谓非辜」以「岂得」强断，收归子胥之冤：既已谋国，终被鸱夷沉江，岂得谓非冤。四句由动机、后果、连锁、结局层层推演，前两句论「破郢」之失，后两句论「赐死」之冤，一是一非、一果一冤，短章而有史断之严。就句法言，四句以「固云—其如—由此—岂得」四个虚词勾连，构成「退—转—承—断」的逻辑链条，虚词斡旋间，史评遂有跌宕、有断案，七绝之短章因之而具一篇史论之起伏。七绝小制能作如此绵密史评，是方平以论断入绝的本领，亦宋人绝句「以意胜」之一显例。

Allusions

Allusions come from Wu Zixu's story, verified across classics and histories. 'Redress private wrong': Zixu's father Wu She and brother Wu Shang were killed by King Ping of Chu; Zixu fled to Wu to avenge, the Shi ji says he 'dug up King Ping's tomb and whipped it three hundred' to repay private hate; Fangping with 'granted' does not hide the private nature—fair brush. 'Sacking Ying': Wu troops entered Ying, Chu nearly fell; Zixu dug and whipped, venting yet crippling Chu; Fangping notes it 'harmed Wu'—Wu, a small state, beat Chu and grew arrogant, later prey to Yue. 'Fuchai's heart grew arrogant' continues that fruit: after beating Chu, Fuchai more luxurious, later took Yue's peace, killed Zixu, finally destroyed by Yue—the causal chain of 'thence.' 'Leather sack' (chiyi) uses Zixu's death: Fuchai gave the Zhulu sword to suicide, put his corpse in a leather sack and floated it on the river; Fangping's 'how could the leather sack mean not wronged' asks his wrong—having served Wu so, he met that end, how not wronged. Also 'leather sack' has another link: Fan Li, after helping Yue destroy Wu, retired and styled himself 'Master Leather Sack'; same sack—Zixu wrapped for loyalty, Fan Li fled for wisdom—fates apart, hinting at the lesson of advance and retreat for a turbulent-age merit official. Allusions chain tightly, condensing Zixu's loyal-injustice into four lines—a model of Song 'making poetry from learning' while judging history.

诗中用典皆出伍子胥本事，皆经史互证。其一，「修私怨」指子胥父伍奢、兄伍尚为楚平王杀，子胥奔吴立志复仇，《史记》所谓「掘楚平王墓，鞭之三百」以报私怨；方平以「固云」二字，不讳言其复仇的私人性质，史笔平允。其二，「破郢」即吴师入郢、楚几亡之事，子胥掘墓鞭尸，固泄愤亦重创楚国；方平指出此举「不利吴」，盖吴以小国胜楚，顿生骄志，反为越所乘。其三，「夫差心遂侈」承破郢之果，言夫差既胜楚，益骄奢，后纳越和、赐死子胥，终为越灭——此即「由此」二字所绾的因果链。其四，「鸱夷」用子胥死事：夫差赐属镂剑令自刎，以其尸盛鸱夷（革囊）浮之江；方平「鸱夷岂得谓非辜」以反问写其冤——谋吴如此而不得其死，岂得云非冤。又，「鸱夷」一词另有关合：范蠡佐越灭吴后，功成身退，亦自号「鸱夷子皮」，同一「鸱夷」，子胥因忠而裹尸、范蠡因智而远祸，命运悬隔，暗含乱世功臣进退之鉴。诸典环环相扣，把子胥一生忠冤浓缩为四句，是宋人「以学问为诗」而能裁断历史的范例。

Commentary

Fangping's 'On the Temple of the Heroic Prince' belongs to the Song historical quatrain's 'overturn and sympathy together' line, same tune as Du Mu's 'On the Wu River Pavilion' and Wang Anshi's 'Again on the Wu River Pavilion,' but more on history's necessity. Commentators on Zixu either praise his revenge's ferocity or criticize his bluntness; Fangping neither praises nor criticizes, but analyzes the chain 'private wrong—sacking Ying—arrogance—gift of death,' showing in four lines how personal revenge moves a state's fate and how bluntness invites calamity. This is the poetic form of the Northern Song historiographic spirit of 'pushing to the hidden'—not satisfied with moral judgment but clarifying the logic between events. Also, Zixu's river-sunk tide legend since Tang is a loyalty-injustice symbol; Fangping inscribes at the temple yet writes not the marvel but the lesson—showing Song poetry's 'reason wins.' Qing critics of the historical-quatrain form often praise Fangping and other Song poets for fitting a historical verdict in twenty-eight characters; this poem's four particles are micro-evidence of Song quatrains using prose grammar as poetry. Compared with Fan Zhongyan's 'first worry, last joy' and Ouyang Xiu's 'toil raises a state,' Fangping's lament of Zixu's wrong holds the Northern Song literati's anxious consciousness echoing in historical poetry—short yet deeply worried.

方平《题英烈王庙》在宋人咏史绝句中属「翻案与同情并出」一路，与杜牧《题乌江亭》、王安石《叠题乌江亭》之翻案同调，而更重史势之必然。历来论子胥者，或美其复仇之烈（如申包胥之比），或讥其刚戾（如太史公「弃小义、雪大耻」之评），方平则不美不讥，而析其「私怨—破郢—骄侈—赐死」的因果链，于四句中见出个人复仇如何牵动国运、刚直如何招祸。这种写法，是北宋史学「推见至隐」精神的诗化：不满足于道德评判，而要厘清事件之间的逻辑。又，子胥沉江化潮的传说，自唐以来已成忠冤符号，方平庙中题诗，落墨却不在神异，而在史鉴，正见宋诗「以理胜」的特质。清人论绝句中的史论一体，每推方平等宋人，以其能以二十八字容一篇史断；此诗「固云—其如—由此—岂得」四虚词勾连，便是宋调以文法为诗的微观证据。若与范仲淹「先忧后乐」、欧阳修「忧劳兴国」诸议相参，方平于子胥之冤中寄「忠而见疑」之慨，实是北宋士大夫忧患意识在咏史一体中的回响，故其诗虽短，而所忧者深。

Prosody

Form Seven-character quatrain七言绝句

Rhyme First line does not rhyme; lines two and four take the level-tone Yu rhyme, rhyme words 'Wu' and 'gu,' one rhyme to the end, sound deep and melancholy.首句不入韵，二、四句押平声虞韵，韵脚为「吴」「辜」，一韵到底，音沉而郁。

Tone pattern Seven-character quatrain, oblique-start, first-line-not-rhyming form. First line 'granted his aim was private wrong' oblique-start oblique-close; second 'sacking Ying how not harm Wu' level-start level-close; third and fourth 'thence Fuchai's heart grew arrogant, leather sack how not wronged' level-oblique matching, third oblique-close, fourth level-close—fits the quatrain meter.七言绝句仄起首句不入韵体。首句「固云志在修私怨」仄起仄收，次句「破郢其如不利吴」平起平收，三四句「由此夫差心遂侈，鸱夷岂得谓非辜」平仄相谐，第三句仄收、第四句平收，合七绝格律。

Reading note This is a seven-character quatrain, oblique-start first-line-not-rhyming form; four lines twenty-eight characters yet with an essay's rise and fall, best for the condensed feeling of temple inscription. The rhyme takes level-tone Yu's 'Wu' and 'gu'; Yu belongs to the third-grade closed-mouth division of the Yu group, its round, melancholy vowel suits the historical regret of 'sacking Ying harmed Wu' and the sunk wrong of 'leather sack not wronged'; and the first line ends on departing-tone 'wrong' (yuan), the third on rising-tone 'arrogant' (chi) as caesura—oblique endings make the level rhyme's melancholy clearer, read as first argue then lament, matching the emotional curve of 'sacking Ying's fault—gift of death's wrong.' The seven-character quatrain's short form fears direct exposure; Fangping links four lines with 'granted / yet / thence / how could,' giving the historical judgment rise and fall, a verdict, sustained by Yu's deep sound so the short form has aftertaste. Compared with Tang quatrains often scene-lyric, Song's form leans to prose-grammar-as-poetry and argument-into-quatrain; Yu's melancholy is just the outward form of its historical-essay style. To grasp Song quatrains using particles to uphold historical judgment, this is a reference.此诗为七言绝句之仄起首句不入韵体，四句二十八字而具一篇史论之起伏，最宜写谒庙感怀的凝练。韵脚取平声虞韵之「吴」「辜」，虞韵属遇摄合口三等，元音圆润、音色沉郁，与「破郢不利吴」的史憾、「鸱夷非辜」的沉冤恰相称；且首句以去声「怨」、三句以上声「侈」作顿挫，仄声收束使平韵的沉郁更显，读来先论后慨，正合「破郢之失—赐死之冤」的情绪曲线。七绝体短，最忌直露，方平以「固云—其如—由此—岂得」四个虚词勾连四句，使史评有跌宕、有断案，赖虞韵的沉音贯串，使短制有余味。较之唐人七绝多即景抒情，宋人此调偏于以文法为诗、以论断入绝，虞韵之沉郁正是其史论体格的外显；欲体会宋调七绝以虚词撑史论者，此篇可参。

Line by line

固云志在修私怨，破郢其如不利吴。

Granted, his intent was to redress a private grievance; yet how could the sacking of Ying fail to harm Wu?

虽说伍子胥志在报复私怨，然破郢之举岂不也有损于吴国。

Granted his will was to avenge a private wrong; yet taking Ying, what did it do but harm Wu?

首句「固云志在修私怨，破郢其如不利吴」是全诗起手，以一退一进的史评定调，落笔便见宋人论史的平允。上句「固云志在修私怨」以「固云」（虽说、固然）二字先退一步，承认伍子胥助吴破楚的根本动机乃是复仇私愤——父兄被楚平王冤杀，子胥奔吴立志雪耻，其事带有鲜明的私人恩怨色彩，方平不讳言、不美化，反以「固云」点破，史笔极公允。下句「破郢其如不利吴」以「其如」（岂不、又何如）反诘，由私怨转到国运：子胥破郢、鞭尸三百，虽报得家仇，却也使吴国以小小诸侯之师重创大国，一时骄盈、国力透支，反为日后越国所乘。「不利吴」三字是方平独到的史识——他看破复仇快意背后的国事代价。一退一进之间，已把子胥「私义」与「公忠」的内在张力撕开，为后文夫差骄侈、子胥赐死埋下逻辑伏笔，是绝句起手而具史论气象者。

The opening fixes the poem's historical verdict in a retreat and advance, the brush showing at once the fairness of Song historical judgment. The first, granted his will was to avenge a private wrong, first retreats with the words granted, acknowledging that Wu Zixu's fundamental motive in helping Wu break Chu was revenge - his father and brother were wrongfully killed by King Ping of Chu, and Zixu fled to Wu resolved to wipe out the shame; the matter bears the clear color of private grievance, and Fangping neither conceals nor beautifies it, but points it out with granted, the historical brush most fair. The second, yet taking Ying, what did it do but harm Wu? turns from private grievance to the fortune of the state with the rhetorical what: Zixu took Ying and flogged the corpse three hundred times; though he avenged the family hate, he also made Wu, a small marcher state, deal a heavy blow to the great state, for a moment swollen with pride and its strength overdrawn, on the contrary letting Yue later seize the chance. The three words harm Wu are Fangping's original historical insight - he sees through the cost to the state behind the joy of revenge. Between retreat and advance, the inner tension of Zixu's private right and public loyalty is already torn open, laying the logical ground for the later Fuchai's arrogance and Zixu's forced death, a quatrain opening that carries the air of historical argument.

由此夫差心遂侈，鸱夷岂得谓非辜。

Thence Fuchai's heart grew arrogant and vain; how can the leather sack mean he was not wronged?

由此夫差之心渐生骄侈，那鸱夷革囊中的子胥岂能说不是冤屈。

From this, Fuchai's heart grew lavish; how can the leathern bag say he was not innocent?

后联「由此夫差心遂侈，鸱夷岂得谓非辜」由国运转到个人结局，完成全诗「破郢之失—赐死之冤」的对照，亦情感落点。上句「由此夫差心遂侈」以「由此」绾合因果：正因破郢大胜，夫差志得意满、骄奢之心遂生，其后拒子胥之谏、许越之和、沉迷西施，终致吴亡——方平把吴国之败追溯到破郢那一刻的骄志，史识幽深。下句「鸱夷岂得谓非辜」以「岂得」强断收束：子胥既已尽谋国之忠（谏伐越、反对许和），终被赐属镂剑自刎，尸盛鸱夷革囊沉江，「鸱夷」二字凝尽忠臣惨死之象；方平以反问「岂得谓非辜」判定其冤，于史评中透出深切同情。两句一写君之侈（果）、一写臣之冤（报），「由此」示因果、「岂得」示断案，把子胥由复仇英雄到沉江冤魂的悲剧，凝为十四字。短章结以「非辜」之叹，余味中见对刚直招祸这一政治普遍悲剧的感喟。

The closing moves from the state's fortune to the personal end, completing the contrast of the blunder of taking Ying and the injustice of the forced death, and landing the feeling. The first, from this, Fuchai's heart grew lavish, binds cause and effect with from this: precisely because of the great victory of taking Ying, Fuchai's will was satisfied and his arrogant extravagance arose, and later he rejected Zixu's remonstrance, granted Yue's peace, was lost in Xishi, and at last caused Wu's fall - Fangping traces Wu's defeat back to the arrogant will at the moment of taking Ying, the historical insight deep. The second, how can the leathern bag say he was not innocent? closes with the strong judgment of how: Zixu had already done all the loyalty of planning the state (remonstrating against attacking Yue, opposing granting peace), yet at last was forced to die by the sword of Zhulu, his corpse sewn in a leathern bag and sunk in the river; the two words leathern bag condense the image of the loyal minister's cruel death. Fangping judges his injustice with the rhetorical how,透出 deep sympathy within the historical verdict. The two lines, one writing the lord's extravagance (the effect), one writing the minister's injustice (the report), from this showing cause and effect and how showing the verdict, condense Zixu's tragedy from avenging hero to sunken wronged soul into fourteen characters. The short piece closes in the sigh of not innocent, the aftertone showing the feeling for the universal political tragedy of the upright bringing disaster on themselves.

Study

Word focus

鸱夷 Leather sack—the skin bag in which Zixu's corpse was floated on the river, here the ultimate symbol of a loyal minister's wrongful death and transformation into the tide god. 「鸱夷」是末句核心意象，亦是伍子胥悲剧的终极符号。鸱夷本指皮制的口袋，子胥被夫差赐死时，嘱「抉吾眼县吴东门」后，夫差怒，取其尸「盛以鸱夷革，浮之江中」（《史记》）。自此「鸱夷」成为忠臣冤死、沉江化潮的代称，钱塘伍公庙、潮神信仰皆由此来。方平以「鸱夷岂得谓非辜」收束全篇，其用心极深：前数句皆作冷静史评（私怨、不利吴、心侈），至此忽拈「鸱夷」这一饱含血泪的实物，冷静顿时化为沉痛——所有史势推演，最终落到一个忠臣被革囊裹尸、抛入江流的惨象。二字之重，在把抽象的「冤」具象为一口革囊，使结句力透纸背。且「鸱夷」与首句「私怨」遥映：始以私怨起、终以鸱夷结，私怨得报而身殉，个体复仇的快意终被体制的残酷吞没，恰是子胥悲剧的浓缩。以实物收史论，是宋人咏史「于断语中见情韵」的巧处。

破郢 Sacking Ying—Wu's troops entering the Chu capital, the climax of Zixu's revenge and the turning point of Wu's fortune, pivotal in the poem's causal chain. 「破郢」是首句下句的关键词，指吴师入郢、楚昭王出奔、子胥掘平王墓鞭尸的史实，乃全诗因果链的枢纽。郢为楚都，破郢是子胥复仇的顶点，也是吴国国运的转折点。方平论史之独到处，正在「破郢其如不利吴」一句：常人但见破郢为子胥雪耻、为吴扬威，方平却洞见其反面——吴本东南小邦，骤胜大国，君臣骄志顿生，夫差由此奢靡，国势由盛转衰，终亡于越。换言之，「破郢」对子胥是私怨得偿，对吴国却是「不利」之始。二字在诗中位置极巧：它上承「修私怨」（复仇动机），下启「夫差心遂侈」（骄侈之果），是把「个人复仇」与「国家兴亡」焊接在一起的那一环。方平以「破郢」二字撬动整篇史论，足见其剪裁史事、抓关键节点的功力；亦可见宋人咏史不重铺陈而重「眼目」的取向。