五代 Five Dynasties · 词 Ci lyric
鹊踏枝·谁道闲情
Magpie on a Branch: Who Says Idle Feelings
谁道闲情抛掷久。
每到春来，惆怅还依旧。
日日花前常病酒，敢辞镜里朱颜瘦。
河畔青芜堤上柳。
为问新愁，何事年年有。
独立小桥风满袖，平林新月人归后。
Each time spring comes, melancholy still remains.
Daily before flowers I often drink to sickness,
Dare I refuse the mirror’s fading red cheeks?
Riverbank green grass, dike willows.
I ask the newly added sorrow, why does it come every year?
Alone I stand on the small bridge, wind filling my sleeves,
After the woods’ new moon and people return.
Meaning
The lyric expresses a persistent, gentle melancholy that returns every spring despite attempts to abandon it, using images of drinking, fading beauty, and solitary loneliness.
谁说那无端的闲情已经抛掷很久？每到春天来临，惆怅依然如旧。天天在花前借酒浇愁以致病酒伤身，又岂敢推辞镜中容颜的日渐消瘦。河岸边青草萋萋，堤坝上杨柳依依，试问这新添的愁绪，为何年年都有？独自站立在小桥之上，晚风吹满衣袖，直到平林之上新月升起、游人归尽之后。
Appreciation
The poem begins with a rhetorical question denying that idle feelings have been discarded. It then depicts daily intoxication in front of flowers and the resulting pallor, symbolizing deep sorrow. The second stanza shifts to natural scenery—green grass and willows—that triggers new yet perennial sorrow. The final couplet presents a stark, lonely scene of the speaker standing on a bridge with wind in his sleeves, after the moon rises and others have left, effectively conveying endless melancholy through imagery.
【白话串讲】 “谁道闲情抛掷久，每到春来，惆怅还依旧”——冯延巳说：谁说闲愁能放下？每到春天，惆怅照旧回来。“独立小桥风满袖”——一个人站在风里，写尽了说不出的寂寞。 【意象与手法】 词为双调，上片以「谁道」领起，先立「闲情抛掷久」之反，随即以「还依旧」翻跌，章法迂回跌宕。「日日」「敢辞」以决绝语写无法自拔之痴；下片由景及情，过片「河畔青芜堤上柳」以春草杨柳起兴，「为问新愁，何事年年有」以问句推进，结句「独立小桥风满袖，平林新月人归后」以景结情，清空高远，余韵悠长。 【情感与主旨】 冯延巳为南唐宰相、五代重要词人，生活于南唐中后期，国势渐衰而党争不断，其词多写「闲情」「春愁」，历来有「寄托说」与「闲情说」之争。此词写闲愁之挥之不去、年年复生，缠绵悱恻；不论寄托与否，这绵长之愁正是乱世士大夫精神苦闷的折射。 【名句点睛】 默写易错：「谁道闲情抛掷久」之「抛」（勿作「泡」）；「惆怅还依旧」之「惆怅」（chóuchàng，勿作「绸怅」）。「独立小桥风满袖，平林新月人归后」为千古名句，写孤身立桥、风满衣袖、新月平林、游人归尽之境，孤寂清远，王国维评为「境亦深远」，最宜熟读成诵。
Background
Feng Yansi was a chancellor of the Southern Tang dynasty during a period of decline and political strife. His lyrics often use 'idle feelings' and 'spring sorrow' as vehicles to express subtle anxieties about the state’s decline, reflecting the spiritual anguish of scholar-officials in turbulent times.
冯延巳（903—960），一名延嗣，字正中，广陵（今江苏扬州）人，南唐中主李璟朝官至中书侍郎、同平章事（宰相），是五代词坛最重要的词人之一，与温庭筠、韦庄并称，被誉为「花间后劲」。他生活的南唐中后期，国势已由盛转衰：李璟、李煜两朝先后臣服于后周、北宋，割地称臣，朝内党争不断，宋齐丘与冯延巳兄弟、孙晟等各立门户，倾轧不休。冯延巳身处相位而屡遭攻讦，既不能挽国势于既颓，又不得不周旋于党争之中，其内心的忧惧、苦闷与无力感，遂化为词中那缠绵往复、挥之不去的闲愁。其词集名《阳春集》，存词百余首，多写闺情别绪与春日闲愁，历来有「寄托说」与「闲情说」之争：陈廷焯《白雨斋词话》认为其词「忧生念乱」，暗含对国事衰微、身世飘摇的隐忧；王国维则更多从艺术境界着眼，推为北宋词风之先导。此词《鹊踏枝·谁道闲情》即其代表作，写闲愁之年年复生、无法排遣；不论是否别有寄托，这绵长悱恻的愁绪，正是乱世士大夫精神苦闷的真实折射，也是南唐词由「花间」艳情走向北宋士大夫词的过渡桥梁。
Art
The lyric employs a circular structure, starting with a rhetorical question and using repeated contrasts to emphasize the inescapability of sorrow. Feng excels in portraying subtle, lingering emotions with refined language, and his technique of 'concluding feelings with a scene' in the final couplet creates an expansive, desolate atmosphere. This style anticipates the Northern Song lyrical tradition.
此词为双调小令，章法之妙在「盘旋往复、以反跌正」。上片以「谁道闲情抛掷久」的反问领起，先立「闲情抛掷久」之反说，随即以「每到春来，惆怅还依旧」翻跌——一个「还依旧」将「抛掷久」彻底否定，闲情之顽固难遣，不言愁而愁自见。接着「日日花前常病酒，敢辞镜里朱颜瘦」两句，以「日日」「常」写沉溺之深、以「敢辞」的反语写无法自拔之痴：明知病酒伤身、朱颜易瘦，却依然沉湎其中，「敢辞」二字是决绝语亦是无奈语，深婉之至。过片「河畔青芜堤上柳」由情转景，以春草、杨柳的年年新绿，自然引出「为问新愁，何事年年有」的诘问——新愁实为旧愁，年年春来、年年愁生，周而复始，无可逃遁。结二句「独立小桥风满袖，平林新月人归后」以景结情：不写愁而写一个孤独立桥、任风吹满衣袖、直到平林新月升起、游人散尽仍不忍归去的剪影，将满腔闲愁化入清空高远的意境之中，言有尽而意无穷。全词上片以问起、下片以问转、末以景收，虚实相生，往复回环；语言雅润清丽，不着雕饰，却自有一种盘旋深婉之力，故王国维谓其「堂庑特大」，开北宋晏殊、欧阳修一派词风之先声。
Allusions
The tune title 'Magpie on a Branch' is also known as 'Butterflies in Love with Flowers'. The imagery of idle feelings draws from the Chu Ci tradition of melancholy, and the green grass and willows recall the trope of spring grass in 'Chu Ci: Summoning the Recluse' to evoke longing. Feng synthesizes these allusions into a unique, lingering expression.
此词用典不事堆砌，而将前人愁绪书写熔铸于意象脉络之中，自成绵邈一格。其一是词牌渊源：《鹊踏枝》本唐教坊曲名，即《蝶恋花》之别名，一名《凤栖梧》《黄金缕》，冯延巳以此调写闲愁最为著名。其二是「闲情」传统：「闲情」一词承《楚辞》「眇眇兮愁予」的忧愁传统，又暗合陶渊明《闲情赋》之「闲情」题旨，陶赋写「闲邪存诚」之「闲」情，冯词则转写无端无名的闲愁，赋予传统意象以新的内涵。其三是「春草寄愁」范式：「青芜」即青草，暗用《楚辞·招隐士》「王孙游兮不归，春草生兮萋萋」——春草年年生而王孙不归，正是年年春草惹起年年离愁的母题；白居易「远芳侵古道，晴翠接荒城」亦承此脉，冯词「河畔青芜」正以芳草之年年新绿写愁之年年复生。其四是「朱颜」意象：「朱颜瘦」写容颜憔悴，暗用屈原《离骚》「及年岁之未晏兮」的盛年之忧，及李白「红颜」凋谢的传统，以形貌之损写情志之痴。其五，「平林新月」化用南朝谢朓「寒城一以眺，平楚正苍然」的平远之境，更启李白《菩萨蛮》「平林漠漠烟如织」之先声。冯延巳将楚辞、乐府、南朝与初盛唐的意象汇于一炉，皆归于缠绵悱恻的闲愁书写，遂成五代词中意蕴最丰的一格。
Commentary
Liu Bin of the Song dynasty recorded that Wang Anshi especially admired Feng’s line 'The spring breeze stirs, rippling a pool of green water'. Wang Guowei in his 'Notes on Lyrics' praised Feng Yansi as expansive and a forerunner of Song dynasty lyrical style, particularly the line 'Alone I stand on the small bridge, wind filling my sleeves' for its profound realm.
历代评家对冯延巳此词评价极高，是五代词中公认的压卷之作之一。宋刘攽《中山诗话》载王安石极爱冯延巳「风乍起，吹皱一池春水」句，又与其「小楼吹彻玉笙寒」并赏，可见宋人对冯词之推重。清陈廷焯《白雨斋词话》谓冯词「极沉郁之致，穷顿挫之妙」，以为其「忧生念乱，意有所属」，将词中闲愁坐实为家国之忧；王国维《人间词话》则从境界立论，评曰：「冯正中词虽不失五代风格，而堂庑特大，开北宋一代风气。『独立小桥风满袖，平林新月人归后』，境亦深远。」此评已成定论：冯词之「堂庑特大」，正在于其将五代词人笔下具体的闺怨离情，升华为一种带有普遍性的、弥漫于天地间的闲愁，因而既能感发人主（李璟尝戏问「吹皱一池春水」干卿何事），又能打动千载之后的读者。就词史而言，冯延巳上承花间温韦之婉丽，下启北宋晏殊、欧阳修之清雅——晏殊「无可奈何花落去」的圆融、欧阳修「庭院深深深几许」的深婉，皆可见冯词盘旋往复笔法的影子，故王国维推为北宋词风之先导。叶嘉莹先生论冯词，特重其「感情之境界」与「因袭中之创新」，以为冯词能在花间浓艳之外别开一条幽深绵邈之路，正为此词「深美闳约」之证。
Prosody
Line by line
谁道闲情抛掷久。每到春来，惆怅还依旧。
Who says idle feelings have been thrown away long? Each time spring comes, melancholy still remains. — The opening rhetorical question denies that feelings can be discarded, emphasizing their persistence.
谁说那无端的闲情早已抛掷许久？每到春天来临，惆怅依旧如故。
Who says this idle grief has long been cast aside? Every time spring comes, the melancholy is as before.
起笔以「谁道」二字反问领起，先声夺人，立论奇峭。按常理，闲情既云「抛掷久」，似已断除净尽，然一个「谁道」将此说法轻轻否去，紧接着「每到春来，惆怅还依旧」翻跌而下——「每到」写其周期性，「还依旧」写其顽固性，一个「还」字，将年年春来、年年愁生的无奈写尽。春本是最易令人欣悦的季节，词人却逢春而愁、触景伤怀，足见其愁非由外物偶起，而是一种根植于生命深处的无端闲愁，如影随形，无法排遣。「闲情」冠以「谁道」之问，实为自问自答：明知抛掷不去，偏要问一声谁能抛掷，这一问，正是愁深难遣、欲自宽解而不得的曲折心曲。两句以反为正、以问写愁，起调即高，为全词盘旋往复的章法定下基调。
The opening leads in with the rhetorical 'who says,' seizing the ear and setting up a strange thesis. By common sense, if the 'idle grief' is said to have been 'long cast aside,' it would seem done with; yet the single 'who says' lightly denies this, and at once 'every time spring comes, the melancholy is as before' tumbles down—'every time' writing its recurrence, 'as before' its stubbornness. Spring is by nature the season most apt to delight, yet the poet meets spring with grief, showing that his grief arises from a groundless idle sorrow rooted deep in life itself, following him like a shadow and beyond dispelling. The question being the winding heart of grief too deep to dispel, it sets the tune high from the start and lays the keynote for the whole's circling structure.
日日花前常病酒，敢辞镜里朱颜瘦。
Daily before flowers I often drink to sickness, dare I refuse the mirror’s fading red cheeks? — The speaker indulges in drinking despite knowing it harms health, showing obsessive attachment to sorrow.
天天在花前借酒浇愁以致伤身病酒，又岂敢推辞镜中容颜的日渐消瘦。
Day after day before the flowers I drink till wine-sick; how can I refuse the slimmed red face in the mirror?
这两句正面写闲愁之深、沉溺之痴，是全词情感最浓烈处。「日日」极言其频，「常病酒」极言其烈——花前本宜赏心乐事，词人却日日对花而饮、饮至成病，可见其愁之不可解、非醉不能遣；「敢辞」二字是全句诗眼，意为「岂敢推辞」，是反语亦是决绝语：明知病酒伤身、朱颜易老，却甘愿以憔悴之躯承受这份闲愁，一个「敢」字，写尽明知不可为而为之的执着，也暗含对镜自怜、无可告语的孤寂。值得注意的是，上句写「病酒」之形，下句写「朱颜瘦」之影，「镜里」二字尤妙：对镜见瘦，正是自我观照、自我确认其愁的一瞬，容颜之损与闲情之深在此互为表里。两句语浅而情挚，以决绝之语写无法自拔之痴，深婉动人，遂成传诵千古的名句。
These two lines write directly the depth of the idle grief and the folly of the indulgence, the most intense passage of the lyric's feeling. 'Day after day' stresses frequency, 'often wine-sick' its violence—before the flowers, the poet yet drinks until he falls ill, showing his grief beyond solving, beyond wine. The words 'how can I refuse' are the eye of the line: knowing wine-sickness harms the body and the face ages, yet willing to bear this idle grief in a wasted frame, the persistence of doing what he knows cannot be done. What is noteworthy is that the first line writes the shape of 'wine-sickness,' the second the shadow of 'the slimmed face,' and the words 'in the mirror' are the most exquisite: seeing his thinness in the mirror is the instant of self-observation, confirming his grief—the loss of looks and the depth of idle grief being two sides of one another, deep and moving, an age-old celebrated line.
河畔青芜堤上柳。
Riverbank green grass, dike willows. — A natural scene that evokes renewal of sorrow; 'willows' pun on 'stay' (liu), hinting at parting.
河岸边一片青翠的春草，堤坝上依依的杨柳。
Green grass by the riverbank, willows on the embankment.
过片一句单写春景，笔势由情转景，看似闲笔，实为全词承转之枢纽。河畔青芜、堤上垂柳，皆是春天最常见之景，青芜年年新绿、柳丝岁岁拂堤，本无愁意；然在愁人眼中，芳草之萋萋恰如愁绪之蔓延，柳丝之袅袅又似离情之缠绕——「柳」谐「留」，自《诗经》「昔我往矣，杨柳依依」以来即为惜别之象征，青芜则暗用《楚辞·招隐士》「王孙游兮不归，春草生兮萋萋」的春草寄愁范式，故春景一入愁眼，便处处是愁。此句以景起兴，为下句「为问新愁」作势：正因青芜柳色年年如此，方引出愁之年年复生的诘问。一句之中，景语即情语，白描之中见深婉，是过片转承处最见功力的写法。
The first line of the lower stanza writes spring scenery alone, the brush turning from feeling to scene. The green grass by the river and the willows on the embankment are the most common sights of spring—the grass newly green every year, the willows trailing the bank every year, in themselves holding no grief; yet in the eyes of the grieving, the lush grass is like the spreading grief, and the trailing willow threads like the缠绕 of parting feeling, the willow being the symbol of reluctant parting since the Book of Songs, while the green grass covertly uses the 'Recalling the Recluse' paradigm of 'the wanderer roves and returns not, spring grass grows lush,' so that once spring scenery enters the grieving eye, everywhere is grief. The line awakens through scenery, storing momentum for the next line's 'I would ask after the new grief'—within plain depiction lies depth, the most crafted passage of the stanza's turn.
为问新愁，何事年年有。
I ask the newly added sorrow, why does it come every year? — The question highlights the cyclical, inescapable nature of sorrow.
试问这新添的愁绪，为什么年年都有、岁岁不休。
I would ask this new grief: why must it come, year after year?
这两句以诘问推进，是全词的枢纽与题眼。妙在「新愁」二字——年年春天，词人总要添一段新愁，然细味之，所谓「新愁」实为「旧愁」：同一份闲情，去岁春来如是，今岁春来依旧，年年复年年，新者实旧，旧者常新，故名「新」而实「旧」，「新」字正写出愁之周而复始、永无了时。「何事年年有」一问，问得无理而情深：愁之有无，本非人力可问可答，词人偏要叩问苍天、叩问春色，这明知无答而偏要一问的执拗，正是愁到极处、欲求其故而不可得的怅惘。上句以青芜堤柳起兴，此句以问承接，将自然之永恒（春草年年绿）与愁绪之永恒（闲愁年年有）并置，人世的无奈遂与天地的轮回同构，问得愈无理，愈见情之深挚无奈。
This couplet pushes forward by way of a question, the hinge and thesis of the whole lyric. The art lies in the words 'new grief'—every spring the poet adds a fresh grief, yet read closely the so-called 'new grief' is the 'old grief': the same idle feeling, so last spring, so this spring, year on year, the new being in truth the old, the old ever new, and the name 'new' precisely writing how grief circles and never ends. The question 'why must it come, year after year?' is unreasonable yet deeply felt: whether grief exists is beyond human question, yet the poet knocks at heaven and at spring itself, asking where no answer can be—this stubbornness of asking knowing there is no answer is precisely the wistfulness of grief at its extreme, when the cause is sought in vain. The question sets the eternal spring grass against the eternal grief, so that human helplessness becomes isomorphic with the cycles of heaven and earth, and the more unreasonable the question, the more deep and helpless the feeling shows.
独立小桥风满袖，平林新月人归后。
Alone I stand on the small bridge, wind filling my sleeves, after the woods’ new moon and people return. — The scene creates a desolate, lonely atmosphere, inviting endless reflection.
独自站立在小桥之上，清风灌满衣袖；平林之上新月升起，游人早已归尽之后。
Alone I stand on the little bridge; the wind fills my sleeves, above the level woods the new moon rises, after the wanderers have gone home.
结二句以景结情，是千古传诵的名句，王国维《人间词话》特赏其「境亦深远」。词人不写愁而写一个场景：暮色中，游人尽散，他独自立于小桥之上，任晚风吹满衣袖，直至平林之上新月升起、天地归于沉寂。四个意象层层渲染孤寂之境——「独立」写形单影只，「小桥」写孑然一身之渺小，「风满袖」写凉风灌袖之彻骨，「平林新月人归后」更以游人之「归」反衬词人之「不归」，以热闹之散场衬孤寂之愈深。全句无一字及愁，而闲愁弥漫于整个画面：风满衣袖是愁之盈满，人归后是愁之无伴，平林新月是愁之悠远。以景结情、化情入景，使抽象之愁具象为可触可感之境界，言尽而意不尽，余韵悠长，正见冯词「深美闳约」之本色。
The closing couplet ends in scenery, the most recited passage of the lyric, praised by Wang Guowei for its 'far-reaching realm.' The poet writes no grief but a single scene: at dusk, the visitors have dispersed, and he stands alone on the little bridge, letting the evening wind fill his sleeves, until above the level woods the new moon rises and heaven and earth sink into silence. Four images layer the solitude—'alone' writes the single figure, 'little bridge' the smallness of him against the vastness, 'wind fills my sleeves' the chill of wind pouring into the cuffs, and 'above the level woods the new moon rises, after the wanderers have gone home' sets the wanderers' 'return' against the poet's 'not returning,' the dispersal of the crowd setting off the deepened solitude. Not one character speaks of grief, yet idle grief fills the whole picture: the wind-filled sleeves are grief overflowing, the hour after others have returned is grief without companion, the level woods and new moon are grief stretching far. Ending feeling in scenery and melting feeling into the scene, it makes abstract grief into a palpable realm, words exhausted yet meaning unending, the very bone of Feng Yan's 'profound and beautiful' verse.
Study
Word focus
Related Reading
Both Feng’s and Liu Yong’s lyrics explore persistent spring melancholy through wine and flowers, concluding with bleak scenes. Feng’s is more restrained and suggestive, while Liu Yong’s is more explicit and sentimental, showing evolution of the theme.
冯延巳「谁道闲情抛掷久」写闲愁之挥之不去、年年复生，柳永「伫倚危楼风细细」写春愁之执着沉溺、至死不悔，二词同以花酒写愁、同以景语收束，渊源有自。然细辨其异：冯词之愁是无端无名、弥漫于天地间的闲愁，问「何事年年有」而终无答，含蓄深婉，归于清空之境；柳词之愁则有明确的着落——「为伊消得人憔悴」，为思念之人而愁，执着一往、淋漓尽致，归于痴绝之态。冯启其婉、柳极其态：冯词以盘旋往复之笔写愁之不可遣，柳词以直抒胸臆之笔写愁之不可已，一幽一显，一敛一放，正可见婉约词由五代入北宋、由含蓄入深挚的演进脉络。
如梦令·常记溪亭日暮 Dreamlike Song: Often Remember the Sunset at the Creek Pavilion 李清照 · 同婉约词风 Same graceful styleFeng Yansi’s lyric initiates the graceful tradition in the Five Dynasties, while Li Qingzhao’s represents its peak in the Song. Both are delicate and lyrical in language, but Feng’s is melancholic and Li’s is joyful, demonstrating different emotional registers within the same style.
冯延巳五代词开婉约先声，李清照宋词集婉约大成，二词一写「闲愁」之绵长，一写「游兴」之率真，情致虽异，而皆以情致深婉、语言清丽见长。冯词「独立小桥风满袖，平林新月人归后」以景结情，将闲愁化入清空之境；李清照「兴尽晚回舟，误入藕花深处」以事写趣，将少女的欢愉写得灵动飞扬——一静一动、一愁一乐，恰成婉约词情感光谱的两极。然细察其承传：李清照论词主「别是一家」，其词之含蓄蕴藉、语浅情深，正承五代北宋婉约一脉而来，冯延巳之深婉、晏欧之圆融，皆为其先导。合观二词，可见婉约词风自五代至两宋的传承与流变，冯为源，李为流，源远而流长。