All poems

宋 Song · 文 Prose

卖油翁·版本二

The Old Oil Seller (Version II)

欧阳修

Ouyang Xiu

名篇Masterpiece 寓言Fable 熟能生巧Practice Makes Perfect 文言文Classical Prose

康肃问曰：汝亦知射乎？
吾射不亦精乎？
翁曰：无他，但手熟尔。
康肃忿然曰：尔安敢轻吾射！

Kangsu asked him: 'Do you understand archery too? Is not my archery excellent?' The old man said: 'Nothing remarkable—only that my hand is practiced.' Kangsu said angrily: 'How dare you slight my archery!'

Listen

Meaning

The conflict at the heart of Ouyang Xiu's famous fable 'The Old Oil Seller.' Duke Kangsu (Chen Yaozhi), proud of his archery, asks the old oil seller twice: 'Do you understand archery too? Is not my archery excellent?' The old man answers in six words: 'Nothing remarkable—only that my hand is practiced.' The proud archer flares up: 'How dare you slight my archery!' The passage sets the archer's pride and anger against the oil seller's plainness and calm, and the secret of skill—'only that my hand is practiced'—will be proved when the old man pours oil through a coin without wetting it, the great truth of practice making perfect spoken through the humblest lips.

康肃公问道：你也懂得射箭吗？我的射箭技术不也很精湛吗？卖油翁说：没有别的奥妙，只不过手熟罢了。康肃公恼怒地说：你怎么敢轻视我的射箭技术！

Appreciation

This passage is the conflict at the heart of 'The Old Oil Seller,' and its art may be seen in dialogue, contrast, and groundwork. First, the writing of character through dialogue: the passage is almost wholly dialogue, with no word of psychology and no touch of setting, yet the characters are all in their speech—Kangsu's first question 'do you understand archery too?' is contempt: an old man who sells oil, does he understand archery? His second 'is not my archery excellent?' is self-display: is not my skill excellent? The two questions together, from slighting the man to praising himself, the pride leaps off the page; the old man's six words 'nothing remarkable—only that my hand is practiced' are plain, brief, unmoved, setting the other's peerless skill lightly down, his composure against Kangsu's arrogance in exact reverse. Second, the use of contrast: Kangsu's angry 'how dare you slight my archery!' flares up against the old man's calm, the hot against the cold, the proud against the humble. Third, the groundwork: the old man's six words plant the whole truth of the fable—'only that my hand is practiced'—preparing the demonstration of pouring oil through the coin that follows.

【白话串讲】欧阳修写《卖油翁》：陈尧咨射箭“十中八九”，卖油翁只“微颔之”。陈发怒：“尔安敢轻吾射！”卖油翁当场“以钱覆其口，徐以杓酌油沥之，自钱孔入，而钱不湿”——他说：“无他，但手熟尔”——陈“笑而遣之”——熟能生巧，令人心服。【意象与手法】本文是欧阳修笔记小说《归田录》中的名篇，艺术上最突出的是「以对话写人」：康肃公的连珠发问与忿然怒斥，写出其恃才傲物、锋芒毕露；卖油翁的「无他，但手熟尔」，以最平淡的语气道出最深刻的道理，写出其不卑不亢、胸有成竹。一问一答之间，一骄一谦、一躁一静，人物形象判然分明。【情感与主旨】主旨是「熟能生巧」：任何技艺的精湛都源于反复练习，并无神秘可言；同时讽刺那些自恃一技之长便骄傲自满的人，劝人谦虚。康肃公的「忿然」与卖油翁的淡然，正是一「骄」一「谦」的鲜明对照。【名句点睛】「无他，但手熟尔」以六个字道破技艺精熟的秘诀，成为「熟能生巧」的经典表述，千百年来激励无数人以勤补拙；「尔安敢轻吾射」的怒问则活画出恃才傲物者的骄态，一正一反，尽在此段。

Background

'The Old Oil Seller' is from the Collected Records of Retirement that Ouyang Xiu wrote in his old age, a well-known little fable. Ouyang Xiu (1007–1072), courtesy name Yongshu, hao Zuiweng and Liuyi Jushi, a native of Yongfeng, Jizhou, was the leader of Northern Song literature, one of the Eight Great Prose Masters of the Tang and Song, and the standard-bearer of the reform of Song poetry and prose, his style plain and fluent, easy and leisurely. The Collected Records of Retirement is a notebook he wrote after retiring in his old age, recording the words and deeds of the early Northern Song monarchs and ministers, the anecdotes of the court and the countryside, and the tales of the lanes, in plain, spare strokes full of interest; 'The Old Oil Seller' is the most widely circulated of its pieces. Duke Kangsu is Chen Yaozhi, courtesy name Jiamo, zhuangyuan of the reign of Emperor Zhenzong, who rose to Hanlin Academician and Military Commissioner, famed for his archery, his biography in the History of the Song recording that 'he was skilled in clerical script and archery, and once using a coin as the target, pierced it with a single arrow'; the oil seller is a man of the market invented by the author, whose plain words to a great official point out the secret of the archery he was so proud of.

《卖油翁》选自欧阳修晚年所撰笔记《归田录》，是一则脍炙人口的小品寓言。欧阳修（1007—1072），字永叔，号醉翁、六一居士，吉州永丰人，北宋文坛领袖，「唐宋八大家」之一，主盟北宋诗文革新运动，其文平易流畅、纡徐委备，影响及于一代文风。《归田录》是欧阳修晚年致仕归田后所撰的笔记，多记北宋前期君臣言行、朝野轶事与里巷传说，笔致简淡而意趣盎然，《卖油翁》即其中流传最广的一则。故事中的康肃公即陈尧咨，字嘉谟，宋真宗朝状元，官至翰林学士、武信军节度使，以善射闻名一时，《宋史》本传载其「工隶书，善射，尝以钱为的，一发贯其中」；卖油翁则是作者虚构的市井人物，以一名贩油老者的平常言语，点破达官贵人引以为傲的射技之秘。此则小记的写作，寄寓了欧阳修对「骄傲自满」的警戒与对「熟能生巧」的肯定——北宋承平日久，士大夫以技艺相矜、以虚名相尚的风气渐长，欧阳修借一老翁之口，让「状元善射者」在一位平民面前低下头来，正是其对虚骄世风的婉讽，也体现了他一贯的平实通达的人生观。

Art

The art may be seen in dialogue, contrast, and groundwork. The passage is almost wholly dialogue, with no word of psychology and no touch of setting, yet the characters are all in their speech: Kangsu's two questions, from slighting the man to praising himself, the pride leaps off the page; the old man's six words 'nothing remarkable—only that my hand is practiced' are plain, brief, unmoved, his composure against Kangsu's arrogance in exact reverse. The contrast of Kangsu's anger against the old man's calm, the hot against the cold, the proud against the humble. And the groundwork: the six words plant the whole truth of the fable, preparing the demonstration of pouring oil through the coin that follows.

此段是《卖油翁》全文的冲突核心，其艺术魅力可从对话、对比、铺垫三端析之。其一，以对话写人的白描手法：全段几乎全由对话构成，无一句心理描写、无一字环境渲染，而人物性格尽在言谈中——康肃公「汝亦知射乎？吾射不亦精乎？」连发两问，第一问「汝亦知射乎」是轻视：你一个卖油的老头也懂射箭？第二问「吾射不亦精乎」是自炫：我的射技难道不精吗？两问相连，由轻人到自夸，骄傲之态跃然纸上；卖油翁「无他，但手熟尔」六字，平淡、简短、不动声色，把对方的绝技轻轻放下，语气之从容与康肃之骄躁恰成反照。其二，对比手法的运用：康肃公「忿然曰」的激愤与卖油翁先前的淡然对比，一急一缓；康肃问句的咄咄逼人与卖油翁答句的云淡风轻对比，一刚一柔；「精」字的自诩与「手熟」的轻描淡写对比，一高调一低调。其三，铺垫蓄势的结构：此段以康肃的怒问「尔安敢轻吾射」收束，把矛盾推向顶点，正是为下文卖油翁「以杓酌油沥之，自钱孔入而钱不湿」的神奇演示蓄足势能——越是写康肃的自负与愤怒，越显出后文老翁演示时的举重若轻，也越使「无他，但手熟尔」的结论获得不容置疑的力量。

Allusions

Though a note of the notebook, its thought is deeply rooted in the Chinese conception of skill. First, the conception of 'practice makes perfect' is of long ancestry: from the pre-Qin 'practice the thousand songs and then know the sound, observe the thousand swords and then know the instrument' of the Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons, and the six arts of the Confucians (rites, music, archery, charioteering, writing, and numbers) learned by repeated practice, the Confucian theory of skill has always valued practice; 'The Old Oil Seller' puts this plain theory of effort into the mouth of a man of the market, bringing it from the classics to everyday life, the folk expression of the great way in the simplest form. Second, the narrative pattern of 'breaking the noble skill with the humble': the oil seller, a mere seller of oil, breaks the pride of the titled archer with the plainest words and the simplest demonstration, the reversal of the humble against the noble, a pattern that recurs throughout Chinese fable and folk literature.

《卖油翁》虽为笔记小品，其思想却深植于中国文化的技艺观念之中。其一，「熟能生巧」的观念源远流长：先秦即有「熟读唐诗三百首，不会作诗也会吟」「操千曲而后晓声，观千剑而后识器」（《文心雕龙》）一类重「熟」重「练」的说法，儒家六艺（礼乐射御书数）的学习本以反复练习为功；《卖油翁》把这一朴素的功夫论借市井人物之口说出，使之从经义层面落到日常生活，是「大道至简」的民间表达。其二，「以贱技破贵技」的叙事模式：卖油翁以一介贩油老者的「酌油」小技，消解了状元善射者的「射箭」绝技，这与《庄子》庖丁解牛、轮扁斫轮等寓言「以技艺言道」的传统一脉相承——庄子借庖丁之口言「道进乎技」，欧阳修则借老翁之口言「熟能生巧」，技艺的至高境界不在神异而在平实，正是东方哲学「极高明而道中庸」的体现。其三，康肃公的形象又暗合中国文学「恃才傲物者受挫」的母题：从《史记》中恃才的陈平、祢衡之傲，到后世「人外有人，天外有天」的训诫，皆在提醒人们不可因一技之长而自满；而卖油翁「以我酌油知之」的现身说法，又体现了中国思维「以实践验证」的实证精神。此段虽短，却浓缩了「熟能生巧」「满招损，谦受益」两大文化母题，故能历千年而不朽。

Commentary

'The Old Oil Seller' has had wide influence in both literary and cultural history. In literature, it is a model of the Song notebook tale: in the briefest space and the most sparing strokes it writes a complete conflict, two distinct characters, and a profound truth, showing the 'plain and flavorful' style of Ouyang Xiu's notebook; its method of writing character through dialogue and lodging the principle in a small matter opens the way to the Ming-Qing essay of the familiar style, and the modern prose writers Zhou Zuoren and Lin Yutang both valued the pale, serene beauty of such notebooks. In thought, the four characters 'practice makes perfect' (shu neng sheng qiao) have become the most frequently cited saying of its kind, a proof that the deepest truth can be carried by the plainest words of the humblest people.

《卖油翁》在文学史与文化史上均有广泛影响。就文学言，它是宋代笔记小说（笔记小品）的典范之作：以极短的篇幅、极简的笔墨，写出一个完整的冲突、两个鲜明的人物、一条深刻的道理，体现了欧阳修笔记「简淡而有味」的风格；其「以对话写人、以小事寓理」的手法，开明清小品文的先声，周作人、林语堂等现代散文家皆推重此类笔记的冲淡之美。就思想言，「熟能生巧」四字成为后世最常援引的励志格言，它把「天才」的迷思还原为「练习」的积累，给一切平凡人以信心；而「无他，但手熟尔」的从容，更成为中国式谦虚的典型表达——真正的高手从不炫技，技至纯熟则归于平淡。就传播言，此文自宋代以来流传极广，屡被选入童蒙读物与后世教材，与《庖丁解牛》《刻舟求剑》等并列为中国寓言文学的入门之作；「熟能生巧」「无他，但手熟尔」更融入日常语言，成为劝学劝练的常用语。历代评家或赏其笔法之简净（如金圣叹评「只用此两句，写尽」），或重其道理之平实，而其魅力正在于以最平常的人物与语言，讲透最朴素的真理——欧阳修笔下这位无名卖油翁，遂成为中国文学中「真人不露相」的经典形象。

Prosody

Form Song notebook tale (essay of the familiar style)宋代笔记小说（小品文）

Rhyme Unrhymed prose; the rhythm comes from the cadence of the dialogue. Kangsu's two questions are short and pressing, one after another like a string of firecrackers; the old man's six words 'nothing remarkable, only that my hand is practiced' are slow, one word at a time, like an old man speaking slowly; 'Kangsu said angrily: how dare you slight my archery' is short and sharp, the anger leaping off the page此文为散体白话小品，不押韵，而以对话的句式节奏营造声情。康肃「汝亦知射乎？吾射不亦精乎」两问连发，音节短促而步步紧逼，如连珠炮；卖油翁「无他，但手熟尔」六字，音节疏缓，一字一顿，如老翁慢语；「康肃忿然曰：尔安敢轻吾射」以「安敢」重音突起，声调高亢，如怒喝一声，戛然而止。

Tone pattern The passage proceeds wholly through the dialogue, Kangsu's questions rising and pressing, the old man's answer calm and plain, Kangsu's angry retort sharp—the three turns of the tone, from arrogant to plain to angry, the two characters in their exact contrast句式长短错落：「汝亦知射乎」「吾射不亦精乎」两个反问句字数相近、语气递进；「无他，但手熟尔」以三字、四字短句轻收，节奏从容；「尔安敢轻吾射」六字短句斩截有力。人物语调一骄一谦、一急一缓，卖油翁语之平淡与康肃语之激愤形成鲜明声情对照，尽显欧阳修笔记「简淡而有味」的笔致。

Reading note The rhythm of the passage is carried entirely by the cadence of the dialogue, the short pressing questions against the slow plain answer, and the sharp angry retort.此段以「对话」为声律的骨干，人物的语气词与句式直接构成节奏的对峙。康肃两问「汝亦知射乎？吾射不亦精乎？」皆为短促的反问句，「乎」字上扬，如锋芒逼人，两问连发，节奏紧凑，仿佛能听见他得意的鼻音；卖油翁「无他，但手熟尔」六字，以「无他」两字顿住，再以「但手熟尔」四字缓缓道出，「尔」字轻收，音节拖长，如老翁眯着眼慢条斯理地回应，一急一缓，对峙之势立现；及至「康肃忿然曰：尔安敢轻吾射」，「忿然」二字短促顿挫，如怒目相向，「安敢」重音突起，整句以反问的声调拔高、戛然而止，把冲突推到顶点，也为下文卖油翁的演示蓄满张力。全文在「急问—缓答—怒喝」三种声调的转换中推进，人物的性格、冲突的进程皆由声音节奏直接呈现，正是「以声写人」的典范；诵读此段，宜以康肃之问急促、老翁之答舒缓、康肃之怒高亢，方能再现这场「骄与谦」的精彩对峙。

Line by line

康肃问曰：汝亦知射乎？吾射不亦精乎？

Kangsu asked him: 'Do you understand archery too? Is not my archery excellent?' (The two questions, from slighting the man to praising himself: the first is contempt for an oil seller who dares to understand archery, the second the self-display of his skill, the pride leaping off the page.)

康肃公问道：你也懂得射箭吗？我的射箭技术不也很精湛吗？

Kangsu asked: Do you know anything of archery? Is not my archery superb?

此句是康肃公的第一次开口，连发两问，傲慢之态毕现。第一问「汝亦知射乎」——「汝」字直呼，居高临下，一个「亦」字更暗含「你也配懂射箭」的轻蔑：在他看来，眼前不过是位卖油老翁，与射箭这门武艺风马牛不相及；第二问「吾射不亦精乎」——由轻人转到自夸，「吾射」两字郑重其事，「不亦……乎」是古汉语中表反问的固定句式，语气中带着不容置疑的自信与炫耀。两问相连，由「轻视对方」到「夸耀自己」，一抑一扬，活画出康肃恃才傲物、锋芒毕露的性格；而「问曰」的「问」字，更暗示这不是平等的请教，而是居高临下的考问。此句在结构上为后文冲突的激化埋下伏笔——康肃越是自负，卖油翁的「无他，但手熟尔」便越显其轻视，冲突便越尖锐；两句问话，已把一位骄傲的状元郎形象写足。

This line is Kangsu's first opening, two questions in sequence, the arrogance fully shown. The first question do you, too, understand archery? — the word thou the direct address, the high-handed, the one word too secretly carrying the you, too, fit to understand archery? contempt: in his view, before him no more than an oil-seller, and archery a skill worlds apart; the second question is not my archery exquisite? — from the light esteem of the other to the self-praise, the two words my archery delivered with gravity, the is it not...? the ancient Chinese fixed rhetorical form, the tone carrying the unquestionable confidence and display. The two questions joined, from the disparagement of the other to the boast of the self, one fall one rise, drawing the self-exalting, sharp-edged champion; and the word asked in asked shows this no equal consultation, but the high-handed examination. This line in structure stores ground for the later conflict's sharpening — the more self-satisfied Kangsu, the more the oil-seller's no other, only the hand's practice shows the disdain, the conflict the sharper; the two questions, the proud champion's figure already complete.

翁曰：无他，但手熟尔。

The old man said: 'Nothing remarkable—only that my hand is practiced.' (The six plain words set the peerless skill lightly down, the old man's composure against Kangsu's arrogance, and plant the whole truth of the fable.)

卖油翁说：没有别的奥妙，只不过手熟罢了。

The old man said: Nothing else; merely the hand's practice.

此句是全文的题眼，以最平淡的语气说出最深刻的道理，妙不可言。「无他」二字轻轻否定——你说你的射技精妙无比，其实「没有别的」；「但手熟尔」四字缓缓道出——只不过手熟罢了。「但」是「只」，「尔」同「耳」，表限止语气，整句话读来漫不经心，仿佛在说一件不值一提的小事。正是这种「漫不经心」，对康肃的炫耀构成了最有力的消解：他引以为傲的绝技，在老者口中不过是「手熟」二字，既不神秘，也不稀罕。这句话的艺术力量全在「以平淡破高傲」——若是卖油翁长篇大论论证射箭之道，反而落了下乘；六个字轻描淡写，反而把康肃的骄傲击得粉碎。在结构上，此句是全文由冲突到折服的枢纽：康肃问得咄咄逼人，翁答得云淡风轻；而「手熟」二字又为下文「以杓酌油」的演示作了理论预告——你且看我的手，也是「手熟」而已。中国文学中「大道至简」的智慧，尽在此六字之中。

This line is the whole piece's eye, saying the deepest truth in the plainest tone, beyond words. The two words no other lightly negate — you say your archery exquisite beyond all, in truth there is nothing else; the four words merely the hand's practice slowly out — no more than the hand's practice. The but means only, the ye like er the limiting particle, the whole sentence read casually, as if of a trifle. Precisely this casualness forms the most powerful dissolution of Kangsu's display: his proud miraculous art, in the old man's mouth, no more than the hand's practice, neither mysterious nor rare. This sentence's artistic power lies wholly in breaking the arrogance through the plainness — had the oil-seller argued the way of archery at length, he would have fallen to the lower hand; six characters of light brush, and Kangsu's pride shattered. In structure, this line is the whole piece's hinge from conflict to submission: Kangsu pressing the question fiercely, the old man answering in the cloud-and-wind lightness; and the hand's practice stores the theoretical preface for the below ladling-through-the-horn demonstration — watch my hand, it too is the hand's practice. The Chinese literature's highest-truth-is-the-simplest wisdom, all within these six characters.

康肃忿然曰：尔安敢轻吾射！

Kangsu said angrily: 'How dare you slight my archery!' (The flare of anger against the old man's calm, the hot against the cold, the proud against the humble, the conflict at its height preparing the demonstration that follows.)

康肃公恼怒地说：你怎么敢轻视我的射箭技术！

Kangsu said angrily: How dare you belittle my archery!

此句是冲突的爆发点，写康肃由自负转为愤怒。「忿然」二字写其神色骤变——被一个卖油老翁说成「不过手熟」，他引以为傲的射技被轻轻抹平，恼羞成怒，「忿然」二字如见其脸涨通红、怒气勃发；「尔安敢轻吾射」的怒斥，「尔」字直指卖油翁，与前文「汝」的轻蔑相呼应而语气更重，「安敢」以反问加强质问的分量——你怎敢！「轻吾射」三字点出他愤怒的根源：不是「轻我」，而是「轻吾射」，他真正珍视的正是这手射技，如今被一个老翁看轻，自尊心受了极大损伤。此句在修辞上以短促的反问句传达激烈的情绪，与卖油翁「无他，但手熟尔」的平淡形成鲜明对照：一个怒气冲天，一个云淡风轻，急与缓、躁与静的对峙达到顶点。而作者的高明处在于不让冲突在此处解决，而是让康肃的「忿然」成为下文老翁「酌油」演示的绝佳铺垫——盛怒之下，老翁仍从容演示，其胸有成竹之态愈见分明，骄者之窘与能者之谦，尽在对照之中。

This line is the conflict's explosion, writing Kangsu's turn from self-satisfaction to rage. The two words angrily write the sudden change of face — being told by an oil-seller no more than the hand's practice, his proud archery lightly smoothed away, the shame and rage, the two words angrily as if seeing his face flushed and the anger bursting; the rebuke how dare you belittle my archery! — the word thou pointing at the old oil-seller, answering the above thou's contempt and yet the tone heavier, how dare strengthening the question's weight — how dare you! The three words belittle my archery name the root of his anger: not belittle me, but belittle my archery, what he truly prizes is this archery hand, now belittled by an old man, the self-esteem deeply wounded. This line in rhetoric conveys the violent emotion in the short question, forming the sharp contrast against the oil-seller's no other, only the hand's practice plainness: one raging to the sky, one cloud-and-wind light, the urgent and the slow, the rash and the still, the confrontation to the peak. The author's mastery lies in not resolving the conflict here, but making Kangsu's rage the perfect preparation for the old man's oil-pouring demonstration — in the full rage, the old man still demonstrates composedly, his assured bearing the clearer, the proud man's embarrassment and the able man's modesty, all within the contrast.

Study

Word focus

亦 Too. The first word of Kangsu's contempt: 'do you understand archery too?'—an old man who sells oil, does he too understand archery? The 'too' writes the pride that an oil seller is unworthy even to know of archery. 「汝亦知射乎」之「亦」字，是康肃轻蔑语气的关键虚词。「亦」本义为「也」，此处用在一个反问句中，暗含强烈的贬抑——「你也懂得射箭吗」，「亦」字透出「凭你也配」的潜台词：在康肃看来，一个市井老翁与射箭本不相干，「亦」字便把这种「本不该懂」的轻蔑轻轻点了出来。这个虚词的妙处在于以极轻的分量传达极重的轻蔑：若去掉「亦」字，句子只余单纯的疑问；加上「亦」字，疑问便带上了居高临下的评判，人物的傲慢立刻生动起来。与之相映，「吾射不亦精乎」的「亦」字又转为自炫的强调——我的射技难道「也」不精吗？「不亦……乎」是古汉语表反问的固定结构，而「亦」字在其中起着增强语气、强化自信的作用。一个「亦」字前后两次出现，一次轻人、一次自夸，以同一虚词写尽人物的两重心理，正是欧阳修炼字的精微处，也可见文言虚词「以轻御重」的表现力。

安敢 How dare. The word of the anger: 'how dare you slight my archery!'—the titled archer's wrath at being lightly set aside by an old man of the market, the pride and the anger leaping off the page. 「尔安敢轻吾射」之「安敢」二字，是康肃愤怒质问的核心，语气斩截如刀。「安」为疑问代词，表「怎么、哪里」；「敢」字兼有「胆敢」的责问意味，「安敢」连用，意为「怎么敢、凭什么敢」，反问的语气中满是不解与震怒——你不值一提的小小老翁，怎敢对我状元公的射技如此轻慢！此二字的力量在于：它把康肃的全部骄傲与愤怒凝于一声质问，既有对卖油翁的怒斥，也有对自己声名受损的不平；而「敢」字更见其身份意识——他是以「地位尊贵者」自居，才会觉得老翁「胆敢」如此。在声调上，「安敢」二字短促有力，与句末「射」字收束，整句读来如雷霆乍发，恰与「忿然」二字的神色描写相配。在结构上，此问与后文卖油翁「徐以杓酌油」的从容形成张力：康肃怒问如山洪，老翁演示如细流，一激一缓之间，骄者之窘愈显，主题之明愈彰。