清 Qing · 诗 Poem
论诗·其二
On Poetry (II)
李杜诗篇万口传,至今已觉不新鲜。
江山代有才人出,各领风骚数百年。
But today they no longer feel fresh.
From age to age new talents emerge,
Each leading literary trends for centuries.
Meaning
The poem argues that even the greatest poets like Li Bai and Du Fu must give way to new talents, as every era produces its own literary geniuses who dominate for a time.
李白杜甫的诗篇被千万人传诵,可时至今日已让人觉得不再新鲜。江山代代都会涌现杰出的才士,各自引领文坛风骚数百年。
Appreciation
The poet first acknowledges Li Bai and Du Fu's towering reputation, then boldly declares that their works now seem stale. He then proclaims that each generation has its own geniuses who lead the literary world for centuries. The poem uses straightforward language but conveys a powerful message about literary evolution.
【白话串讲】 赵翼说:李白杜甫的诗传唱万口,到今天也觉得不够新鲜了。“江山代有才人出,各领风骚数百年”——每个时代都有自己的诗人,别只盯着古人。 【意象与手法】 此诗为清赵翼之作,精要赏析详见下方深度赏析。 【情感与主旨】 赵翼(1727—1814),字云崧,号瓯北,清代史学家、诗人 【名句点睛】 考点常为名句默写、观点理解与比较。须默“江山代有才人出,各领风骚数百年”
Background
Zhao Yi (1727–1814) was a Qing-dynasty historian and poet. This poem is the second of five 'On Poetry' pieces, written after he retired to focus on scholarship. It was a response to the prevailing trend of blindly imitating ancient poets, especially Li Bai and Du Fu.
赵翼(一七二七—一八一四),字云崧,一字耘松,号瓯北,江苏阳湖(今常州)人。乾隆二十六年成进士,相传殿试时本拟置一甲第一,因故改列第三,遂以探花及第;此后历官翰林院编修、广西镇安知府、广东广州知府、贵西兵备道,中年即以亲老引疾归里,主讲安定书院,专力著述数十年。其学问以史为根本,所著《廿二史札记》以考辨史实、贯通古今得失见称,与钱大昕、王鸣盛并为清代考史三家;诗文则有《瓯北集》,诗论有《瓯北诗话》,专论历代大家的得失源流。诗坛上他与袁枚、蒋士铨并称乾隆三大家,主张诗须自出新意,反对一味摹拟前人,与当时格调、肌理诸说异趣。本篇出自其《论诗》五首,是以七言绝句论诗这一传统体式中的名作,作年一般定在其归里著述的中晚年。此组诗五首意脉相贯:第一首以满眼生机转化钧、天工人巧日争新立论,指出天地人事无一日不新,又谓预支五百年新意、到了千年又觉陈,把新与陈的相对性说透;本篇承其意而落到具体的文学史判断上,故读此诗须与组诗同观,方不至误解其意。就文学脉络言,以绝句论诗始于杜甫的《戏为六绝句》,中经元好问《论诗三十首》而蔚为大国,赵翼此组正是这一传统在清代的延续,而所论之重心已由品评具体作家转向阐明文学演进的规律。
Art
This poem uses argumentation within poetic form without becoming dry. The first two lines present a contrast, while the last two expand the view to historical continuity. The language is plain yet forceful, embodying a clear literary theory.
此诗二十八字,纯是议论,而毫无枯燥之感,其法值得细究。前二句以一个近乎大胆的判断起手:李杜诗篇万口传,先立起最高的权威——李杜为唐诗双峰,其作品传诵之广至于万口,这是无人能否认的事实;至今已觉不新鲜,随即抛出一个与权威相左的观感,语气平常如闲话,而内容却足以震动。两句一扬一抑,先把读者引到共识之上,再当头一转,遂造成极强的张力,这是议论文字最难得的开局。后二句不作辩解,而径直给出理由与结论:江山代有才人出是从天地生人立说,谓每一时代自有其杰出者,不必也不能由前代包办;各领风骚数百年则给出每一代人的位置与限度——领是引领、主盟,风骚指《国风》《离骚》所代表的诗歌正统,数百年既是荣宠的期限,也是必然的期限。至此,前二句所谓不新鲜便得到了解释:不是李杜之诗变坏了,而是任何一家的领袖地位都有其时限,新意须由后来者接续生发。全诗以事实起、以观感转、以通则结,三步而理足;语言平易到近乎口语,无一典实、无一藻饰,而气象开阔、断制有力。其力量来源不在辞采,而在识见,故为清人议论诗中最耐读的一路。
Allusions
'Fengsao' (风骚) originally refers to the 'Airs of the States' in the Book of Songs and Li Sao in the Chu Ci, later denoting literary tradition. Here, Zhao Yi uses it to mean literary leadership, implying that each era has its own representative writers.
本篇用语平实,然其中两处名目皆有渊源。李杜并称,自唐已然:韩愈《调张籍》有李杜文章在、光焰万丈长之句,力排当时诋议二家的浅见,此后李杜并举遂成定说,成为唐诗以至整个古典诗歌的最高标尺;元稹为杜甫作墓系铭时曾比较李杜异同,宋人更有优李劣杜、优杜劣李之争,李杜一词因此不只是两个作者,而是一整套价值秩序的代称。赵翼说其至今已觉不新鲜,所触动的正是这一秩序,故语气虽淡而分量极重。风骚二字则指《诗经》之国风与《楚辞》之离骚,二者为中国诗歌的两大源头,一以温厚敦朴著称,一以奇丽悲慨见长,合称风骚遂成诗坛正统与文学盛业的通称,如古人言风骚之体、风骚未坠皆是此义;此处各领风骚,谓在诗坛主盟,非指风流骚雅之情态,读者不可误解。江山一词亦有讲究:其义兼指国土与山川,古人以为山川之灵秀能钟聚而生人才,所谓地灵人杰,故江山代有才人出一句所本者是天地生生不息之理,与组诗第一首满眼生机转化钧同一根柢。字词训诂上最须辨明者是不新鲜三字:此语非谓李杜之诗不好,亦非贬其价值,而是就读者的接受感觉立说——传诵既久,人人成诵,其惊创之力自然递减,此为审美接受的常态,与作品的高下无关。若以此句为轻薄前贤,则全诗之意尽失,而后两句亦无从安顿。
Commentary
Zhao Yi, along with Yuan Mei and Jiang Shiquan, was one of the 'Three Greats of Qianlong'. His literary criticism is noted for its historical insight. This 28-character poem encapsulates the dynamics of literary change, praised by Qian Zhongshu for its incisive argument.
此诗在清代诗论中的地位,主要由其观点的通达而确立。赵翼论诗一贯反对以古为限,《瓯北诗话》遍论李白、杜甫、韩愈、白居易、苏轼、陆游诸家,皆能指出其各自的独造与局限,不以时代先后定优劣,其识见即从本篇所说的道理中来。评者一般以为此组诗最可贵者有二:一是敢于对至高权威作平心之论。前人尊李杜者多矣,訾李杜者亦有之,而赵翼既不尊之为不可逾越,亦不轻之为不足称,只指出一切经典皆有其被熟悉、被凝固的命运,此论不激不随,最见史家眼光——他以治史之法治诗史,故能于变中见常。二是把文学演进说成一个代代接续的过程。江山代有才人出、各领风骚数百年二句,既承认高峰的存在,又否认高峰的独占,故既非拟古,也非非古,而是为后来者留出位置,其中含着一种朗然的自信与雅量。传播史上,此诗在清代随《瓯北集》流布,为论诗者所熟知;近世以来更因其明白如话、道理透彻而被大量选入通行读本与教材,江山代有才人出、各领风骚数百年二句遂脱离原诗,广泛用于称美人才辈出、事业代有承续之处,几成通语。这种流播中最常见的偏失,是把后二句单独引用而弃去前二句,于是只剩人才辈出的赞叹,而失掉了此诗的核心命题——一切新鲜终将陈旧,故文学必须不断更新。读者若能前后合观,方知这两句名言是从一个略带凉意的洞察里生长出来的。
Prosody
Line by line
李杜诗篇万口传,
Li Bai and Du Fu's poems are praised by thousands—
李白杜甫的诗篇被千万人传诵
The poems of Li Bai and Du Fu are on ten thousand lips,
起句先立一个无人可以否认的事实,为下文的转折备足势头。李杜并称自韩愈以来已成定论,二人代表着古典诗歌所能达到的最高处;万口传三字则从传播的广度着眼——不是一二知音的赏爱,而是万人成诵,家弦户诵。此语纯是称许,且称许得毫无保留,故读者读到此处,心中已备好一套仰慕的姿态。妙在作者用如此坚实的共识开篇,正是为了下一句的翻转能落到实处:若前句稍存贬抑,则后句只是顺势的挑剔;唯前句推得极高,后句方能成其惊人。议论之文,起手须让人无从反驳,此句即是范例。
The opening first sets a fact no one can deny, storing full momentum for the turn to come. The pairing of Li and Du has been settled since Han Yu; the two represent the highest reach of classical poetry. The three words on ten thousand lips look to the breadth of spread — not the appreciation of one or two kindred spirits, but ten thousand mouths reciting, every household chanting. The words are pure praise, and praise without reserve, so that the reader, reaching here, has already prepared a posture of admiration. The beauty lies in the author opening with so solid a consensus, precisely that the overturn of the next line may land on solid ground: if the first line held any belittling, the next would be but a carping that follows naturally; only when the first is pushed to the highest can the second become startling. In argumentative prose, the opening must leave no room for rebuttal; this line is the model.
至今已觉不新鲜。
But today they no longer feel fresh.
可时至今日已让人觉得不再新鲜。
yet to this day they no longer feel fresh.
此句是全诗最需辨明处。至今二字点出时间的推移,已觉三字表明这是接受者的感受而非作品的品质判断,不新鲜则以极家常的口语说出一个不易承认的事实:凡传诵万口者,必已被人人熟知;凡被人人熟知者,其初读时的惊创之力必然递减。作者并未说李杜不好,只说人对其已不觉新鲜,一字之别而立论的性质完全不同。语气上尤其平淡,如同随口道来,然正因平淡才无从辩驳。此句的胆气不在贬前贤,而在敢于说出所有人心里都有而不便言的经验,并由此引出后二句的通则——文学史的更新正由这种必然的钝化所推动。
The line is what most needs discerning in the poem. The two words yet to this day mark the passage of time; the three words no longer feel show this is the receiver's feeling, not a judgment on the work's quality; and no longer fresh states, in the most everyday speech, a fact men find hard to admit: whatever is recited on ten thousand lips must already be known to all; and whatever is known to all must have its first-sight force of novelty diminished. The author does not say Li and Du are not good, only that men no longer feel them fresh; the difference of one word changes the nature of the thesis. In tone it is especially plain, as if spoken at random, yet precisely because it is plain it cannot be rebutted. The daring of the line lies not in belittling the ancients, but in daring to speak the experience all men have in their hearts yet find inconvenient to say, and so leading to the general law of the last two lines — the renewal of literary history is driven precisely by this inevitable blunting.
江山代有才人出,
From age to age new talents emerge,
江山代代都会涌现杰出的才士
Every age brings forth its own gifted men,
第三句转入正面立论,且立论的根基不在文坛而在天地。江山兼指国土与山川,古人以为山川灵秀之气钟聚而生人才,故说江山代有,意即天地生生不息,人才之出如草木之春秋代谢,不待前人许可,也不因前人极盛而绝。代字最有分量:一代自有一代之人,一代自有一代之诗,前代的完满不构成后代的障碍。此句语气从容宏阔,全无争胜之意,而唯物之理已足以推倒任何以古限今的说法。与前二句合看,前者说旧者必将变陈,此者说新者必将继起,一往一来,文学史的运动便完整了。
The third line turns to the positive thesis, and its foundation lies not in the poetry world but in heaven and earth. Rivers and hills mean at once the country and the mountains; the ancients held that the spirit of the mountains and rivers gathers to bring forth talent, hence saying every age has its men means that heaven and earth, endlessly generating, send forth talent like the waxing and waning of grass and trees, not waiting for the ancients' permission, nor ending because the ancients reached their peak. The word each age carries the most weight: each age has its own men, each age its own poetry, and the perfection of the former is no obstacle to the latter. The tone is leisurely and vast, without a trace of rivalry, yet the materialist truth is enough to overturn any saying that limits the present by the past. Read with the first two lines: the former says the old must turn stale, this says the new must follow; one outgoing, one incoming, and the motion of literary history is complete.
各领风骚数百年。
Each leading literary trends for centuries.
各自引领文坛风骚数百年。
each leading the fashion of poetry for several hundred years.
结句既是荣宠的许诺,也是限度的宣告,故最有回味。风骚指《国风》《离骚》所代表的诗歌正统,领即主盟、引领,各领二字承上句代有而来,谓每一代的杰出者都能在其时执诗坛之柄。妙在数百年三字:它给出的是一个可观而有限的期限——足以称盛,却不足以永占。既如此,则李杜之被觉不新鲜,正是这一规律的应验,而后来者之当出,也正是这一规律的必然。全诗至此圆合无隙。语气上则宽阔坦然,无一毫嫉前之意,亦无一毫自夸之态,只是把事情的道理说明白,其自信与雅量同时可见,这是史家论文最难得的气度。
The closing is at once the promise of glory and the announcement of a limit, hence the most to be savored. Feng-sao means the poetic orthodoxy represented by the Airs of States and the Li Sao; lead means to preside, to lead; the words each lead follow on every age, saying the outstanding of each generation can, in their own time, hold the handle of the poetry world. The beauty lies in the three words several hundred years: they give a term observable yet finite — enough to be called glorious, yet not enough to occupy forever. That being so, then Li and Du's being felt no longer fresh is precisely the fulfillment of this law, and the coming forth of later men precisely its necessity. The poem closes here, round and without seam. In tone, broad and at ease, without a trace of envy of the ancients, without a trace of self-praise, merely stating the reason of things plainly; his confidence and his magnanimity are both visible at once — this is the rarest bearing of the historian writing on letters.
Study
Word focus
Related Reading
Compare this related work with the poem above through theme, imagery, tone, and emotional movement.
杜甫《戏为六绝句》评庾信、四杰诸家,有尔曹身与名俱灭、不废江河万古流之句,力斥当时轻薄前贤者;又有别裁伪体亲风雅、转益多师是汝师之语,主张广取众长而自辨真伪。此组开创了以七绝论诗的体式,也确立了其基本笔法:以极短的篇幅下极重的断语。赵翼此篇正承其法而立论相反相成——杜甫护卫前贤不使被轻,赵翼提醒后人不必自限于前贤,一者防其轻薄,一者防其拘囚。两组对读,可见论诗绝句这一体式自始便兼有崇古与开新两种声音,而其共同前提是对文学正脉的认真。
论诗三十首 Thirty Poems on Poetry 元好问 · 论诗绝句的集大成之作,可比其批评的取径 Related readingCompare this related work with the poem above through theme, imagery, tone, and emotional movement.
元好问《论诗三十首》遍论汉魏以下诸家,力斥伪体与摹拟,有心画心声总失真、文章宁复见为人之慨,又有排比铺张特一途之论,主张诗须本于真情与自得。其法以品评具体作家为主,长于辨源流、别真伪。赵翼此篇则不评一家之得失,而直接讨论文学演进的通则,故其视野由作家批评转向文学史规律。两者合观,可见论诗绝句自金元至清的重心之移:元好问所争者是何为真诗,赵翼所论者是诗何以必新,一在辨体,一在通变,而后者显然得力于其史学的训练。
论诗·其一 On Poetry (No. 1) 赵翼 · 同组之作,为本篇立论的哲理前提 Related readingCompare this related work with the poem above through theme, imagery, tone, and emotional movement.
组诗第一首以满眼生机转化钧、天工人巧日争新起,谓造化与人事无一刻不在更新;又云预支五百年新意、到了千年又觉陈,指出新与陈只是相对的、暂时的状态——今日之新即他日之陈,故不断更新乃是必然。此论正是本篇的哲理根柢:有了新陈相对的前提,李杜之被觉不新鲜便不是价值的贬损,而是时间的常态;有了日日争新的道理,江山代有才人出也就不是空泛的乐观,而是自然之势。两首并读,可知赵翼论诗并非发一时之快语,其后有一套完整的通变之见,而此见又与其治史所重的古今之变互为表里。