All poems

清 Qing · 诗 Poem

春愁

Spring Sorrow

丘逢甲

Qiu Fengjia

爱国Patriotic 悲愤Anguish 伤时Mourning the Times

春愁难遣强看山，往事惊心泪欲潸。
四百万人同一哭，去年今日割台湾。

Spring grief is hard to dispel; I force myself to gaze at hills.
Heart-stirring past events bring tears that almost spill.
Four million people weep as one:
On this day last year Taiwan was severed.

Listen

Meaning

The poet describes a deep spring sorrow that he cannot shake off. He forces himself to look at the mountains to distract himself, but the shocking memories of the past bring tears to his eyes. The reason for this collective grief is that on this very day in the previous year, the Qing government ceded Taiwan to Japan under the Treaty of Shimonoseki, causing four million Taiwanese to mourn together.

春日的愁绪难以排遣，强打精神去看山景；想起往事惊心动魄，眼泪几乎潸然而下。四百万台湾同胞同一声悲哭，只因去年的今日，朝廷把台湾割让给了日本。

Appreciation

The poem begins with an irrepressible spring sorrow, the character 'force' highlighting the futility of trying to escape the grief. The second line turns to the startling memories that bring tears. The last two lines reveal the source of the sorrow: the cession of Taiwan. The large number 'four million' and the specific date 'last year today' transform personal grief into national tragedy, making the poem a powerful testimony of a humiliating historical event.

【白话串讲】 “四百万人同一哭，去年今日割台湾”——甲午战败，台湾被割让。丘逢甲在台湾率军抵抗失败，写诗纪念：四百万台湾人同声一哭。【意象与手法】诗仅七言四句，却举重若轻。首句「春愁难遣强看山」以「强」字写无可排遣之愁，反起得妙；次句「往事惊心泪欲潸」由景入情，「欲潸」将落未落，含蓄而沉痛。后二句陡转叙事，「四百万人同一哭」以群体悲声写广度，「去年今日割台湾」以精确时间写深度，数字与时间并举，如史笔直书。【情感与主旨】丘逢甲（1864—1912），台湾彰化人，清末爱国诗人。光绪二十一年（1895），甲午战败，清廷签订《马关条约》，割让台湾、澎湖于日本。丘逢甲曾组织义军抗日、力保台湾，终因寡不敌众内渡大陆。此诗约作于1896年春，距割台恰一周年，是诗人爱国诗的代表，血泪斑斑。【名句点睛】常考「四百万人同一哭」的群体悲慨与「去年今日割台湾」的史实直书，以及「强」「欲潸」等字的炼字之妙。

Background

Qiu Fengjia (1864-1912), a native of Zhanghua, Taiwan, was a late Qing patriotic poet. After the Sino-Japanese War (1894-1895), the Qing government signed the Treaty of Shimonoseki, ceding Taiwan and Penghu to Japan. Qiu organized a volunteer army to resist the Japanese occupation but ultimately had to retreat to mainland China. This poem was written around the spring of 1896, exactly one year after the cession. It is a blood-and-tears record of the national shame.

丘逢甲（1864—1912），字仙根，号沧海，台湾彰化人，清末爱国诗人、教育家，有《岭云海日楼诗钞》。光绪二十一年（1895），甲午战败，清廷签订《马关条约》，将台湾、澎湖割让日本。丘逢甲曾倡建台湾民主国、组织义军抗日，血战经年，终因寡不敌众，于同年内渡大陆，居广东镇平（今蕉岭），自号「海东遗民」。此诗约作于1896年（光绪二十二年）春，距割台恰一周年：「去年今日割台湾」即指1895年农历三月二十三日（1895年4月17日）《马关条约》签字割台之耻。诗人于割台周年之际，春愁难遣、往事惊心，遂作此诗以寄悲愤，将一己之愁升华为民族之恸。诗为《岭云海日楼诗钞》名篇，是其爱国诗的代表作，字字血泪，是近代台湾被割让这一民族创伤的诗歌见证，也是研究甲午战后士人心态与近代诗歌史的重要文本，其痛彻肺腑的爱国情感历百余年而弥新。全诗二十八字，字字凝着台湾同胞的血泪，是近代诗歌中最深沉的乡愁与国恨的凝结，至今读之犹令人泫然，亦是两岸同根、血脉相连的历史明证。

Art

This seven-character quatrain is succinct yet powerful. The first line uses 'force' to depict the unbearable sorrow. The second shifts from external landscape to inner emotion. The last two lines abruptly turn to direct narrative, employing a large number and an exact date to intensify the pain. The poem moves from personal lament to collective mourning, from subtle suggestion to stark historical recounting, achieving a profound sense of desolation.

诗仅七言四句，却举重若轻，将一己之愁升华为民族之恸。首句「春愁难遣强看山」以「强」字写无可排遣之愁：愁本难遣，勉强看山以自宽，而山色入目反增怅惘——起笔以「强」字反起，愈见愁之深重，如重石压胸。次句「往事惊心泪欲潸」由景入情：「往事」即割台之痛，「惊心」写其震撼创痛之巨，「泪欲潸」将落未落，含蓄而沉痛，比直写痛哭更见压抑——大悲无声，欲落未落之泪最是断肠。后二句陡转叙事：「四百万人同一哭」以群体悲声写悲剧之广度——四百万同胞同声一哭，如潮水般铺天盖地，个人的泪汇成民族的哭；「去年今日割台湾」以精确时间写悲剧之深度——不是泛泛的国难，而是「去年今日」的切肤之痛，数字与时间并举，如史笔直书，不着一字议论而悲愤自见。全诗由个人之愁（首句）到个人之泪（次句）再到民族之哭（三句）、民族之耻（末句），层层放大、由内而外，以小见大，沉郁苍凉，是近代绝句中举重若轻的典范。

Allusions

'Spring sorrow' is a traditional poetic theme often associated with personal melancholy. Qiu Fengjia gives it a new dimension by linking it to national loss. 'Four million people' is a factual number, shocking in its directness. 'Last year today' echoes the nostalgic phrase from Bai Juyi's 'On this day last year within this gate,' but here it is used to mark a national catastrophe, transforming a conventional time reference into a symbol of enduring pain.

「春愁」本为古典诗词常见题材，李白「春愁」、李煜「问君能有几多愁，恰似一江春水向东流」皆写离情闺怨、个人愁绪；丘逢甲翻新，以「春愁」寄家国丧土之痛，赋予传统意象以近代民族危机的内涵——同一「春愁」，在古人是闲愁艳怨，在丘氏则是山河破碎的沉痛，意象之翻新即时代之翻新，借旧瓶装新酒而愈见其烈。「四百万人」指当时台湾人口约四百万（1895年台湾人口约二百五十余万，诗言四百万为概数，取其声势），以实数入诗，纪实而震撼，开近代「诗史」以数字写悲之先，其血泪之真实远胜夸张之辞——数字的精确使悲痛有了确凿的重量。「去年今日」用追忆笔法，暗合白居易「去年今日此门中」一类的伤逝传统——以「去年今日」的精确对位写时光流转中的不变之痛，一年过去而创痛依旧，时间的刻度反而加深了记忆的烙印，周年之祭，其痛弥深。全诗用典不着痕迹：古典意象（春愁、看山、惊心）与现代史实（四百万、割台湾）熔于一炉，传统形式承载现代内容，正是晚清「诗界革命」的实践，也是旧体诗反映新现实的成功范例。

Commentary

Qiu Fengjia called himself 'Remnant of the Eastern Sea.' Liang Qichao praised him as a leader of the 'Poetic Revolution.' Modern scholar Qian Zhonglian commented that his collection 'Poetry of Lingyun Hailou' is 'every word blood and tears, a poetic history of Taiwan's fall.' This poem, together with works by Tan Sitong and Kang Youwei, represents the patriotic poetry surge of the late Qing period.

丘逢甲自号「海东遗民」，诗多故国之思，梁启超评其为「诗界革命」之健者，「以民间疾苦、国土沦丧入诗」；近人钱仲联谓《岭云海日楼诗钞》「字字血泪，为台湾沦陷之诗史」。此诗二十八字，将1895年割台之痛凝为永恒的诗歌记忆，与谭嗣同「四万万人齐下泪，天涯何处是神州」、康有为诸作并见晚清爱国诗潮之盛——那一代知识分子以诗为史、以诗为檄，将家国之痛铸成民族记忆的丰碑，在中国诗歌史上写下了最悲壮的一页。论其价值，一在史实之真（数字、时间皆纪实，可作信史读），二在情感之深（由一己之愁到民族之哭，层层放大），三在艺术之精（七绝二十八字，起承转合浑然一体，语朴情烈）。今人读此诗，犹能感受甲午割台之痛穿越百年的回响：台湾是中国不可分割的一部分，丘逢甲的血泪之诗正是这一历史事实的文学见证，其爱国精神与艺术价值历久弥新，至今仍激励着每一个中国人。

Prosody

Form Seven-character quatrain (qiyan jueju)七言绝句

Rhyme Level tone shan rhyme (山, 潸, 湾; one rhyme throughout)平声删韵（山、潸、湾，一韵到底）。

Tone pattern The first couplet uses cause-effect parallelism; the second couplet closes with numbers and a direct statement, simple yet deeply moving.前两句以对仗写情（难遣对惊心），后两句以数字收束，语朴情烈。

Reading note Qiu Fengjia, a patriotic poet from Taiwan, wrote this on the anniversary of the cession. The precise date 'last year today' underscores the sharp pain of territorial loss, making this poem a blood-soaked chapter in modern Taiwan's poetic history.此诗为七言绝句，四句二十八字，格律工稳。用韵上，押平水韵上平十五删韵：「山」（删）、「潸」（删）、「湾」（删），一韵到底，韵脚皆开口呼，音节洪亮而悲慨——「山」「湾」二字尤见沉痛：看山是眼前的山水，割台湾是失去的山水，同一「山」韵，将眼前与故土、现实与创伤暗暗勾连，读来朗朗上口而字字含悲。平仄上，全诗合律：「春愁难遣强看山」（平平平仄仄平平）起句，「往事惊心泪欲潸」（仄仄平平仄仄平）对句，「四百万人同一哭」（仄仄仄平平仄仄）转句，「去年今日割台湾」（仄平平仄仄平平）合句，四句平仄相间、黏对合度，是标准的七绝格调，前二句尤见对仗之工（难遣对惊心、看山对欲潸）。句式上，前两句七言对仗工整，由「愁」到「泪」层层内收，写个人之悲；后两句以数字（四百万）与时间（去年今日）入诗，语朴情烈，如史笔直书，写民族之痛。值得注意的是，此诗以七绝这样短小的体式承载割台这样沉重的民族悲剧，形式与内容构成强烈反差：二十八字愈短，愈显国难之重；格律愈整饬，愈见情感之压抑——短小精悍的七绝恰恰成了最凝重的容器。全诗起承转合浑然一体：起（愁）、承（泪）、转（哭）、合（割台），四句如四幕，由个人而民族、由眼前而历史，在最短的篇幅内完成最宏大的抒情，是晚清七绝「以短写重」的典范，亦近代爱国诗中的格律精品。

Line by line

春愁难遣强看山

Spring sorrow hard to dispel; I force myself to look at the hills. The character '强' (force) reveals the poet's extreme helplessness and the futility of seeking solace in nature.

春日的愁绪难以排遣，强打精神去看山景。

Spring sorrow is hard to drive away; I force myself to go look at the hills.

起句写愁之深、遣之难：「春愁难遣」四字直陈——春日万物复苏、本应赏心悦目，而诗人却愁绪满怀、无可排遣，乐景之中反见悲怀；「强看山」三字写强自振作：愁既难遣，姑且看山以自宽，一个「强」字，写尽勉力为之的勉强与无奈。此句之妙在一「强」字：若「看山」出于自然，则愁已浅；正因「强」看，愈见愁之深重不可解——勉强看山而山色入目，反添怅惘，愁上添愁，排遣失败而愈陷愈深。且「春愁」与「看山」形成反差：春光明媚与心境阴翳相对，乐景写哀，一倍增其哀，正是王夫之所谓「以乐景写哀，以哀景写乐，一倍增其哀乐」。此愁非寻常伤春，乃有具体所指的国难之愁，故「难遣」非矫情而是实情，为下文的「往事惊心」蓄势，起笔即定全诗沉郁基调。

The opening writes the depth of grief and the difficulty of escape: four plain words, spring sorrow is hard to drive away. In spring all things revive and the eye should delight, yet the poet is full of grief, with no way out. The three words force myself to go look at the hills write the forced effort: since grief will not leave, he tries the hills to console himself; the word forced exhausts the reluctance and helplessness of the effort. The beauty lies in that word forced: if looking at the hills were natural, the grief would already be shallow; precisely because the looking is forced, the grief is shown deep and insoluble — forcing the hills into the eye only adds to the melancholy, grief upon grief, the attempt failing and sinking deeper. Spring sorrow and looking at the hills form a contrast: bright spring against a darkened mind, writing grief through a joyous scene and doubling it, exactly as Wang Fuzhi said, writing grief through a joyous scene, writing joy through a grievous scene, and doubling both. This is no ordinary spring sorrow but a national calamity with a concrete object; hard to drive away is no affectation but the truth, storing force for the past that startles to come, and fixing the somber tone of the poem from the first stroke.

往事惊心泪欲潸

Heart-stirring past events bring tears that almost spill. '惊心' (heart-stirring) and '泪欲潸' (tears about to fall) directly express the pain of national shame, deepening the preceding line.

想起往事惊心动魄，眼泪几乎潸然而下。

Remembering the past, my heart is shaken, and tears are about to fall.

承首句，「往事」二字点破春愁之根源——不是寻常伤春，而是有具体所指的国难往事，指涉割台之痛，愁之所由来豁然开朗；「惊心」写往事之震撼创痛：割台之变，山河破碎，故土沦丧，思之令人心惊，二字凝练写出国难带来的巨大心理冲击，如刀刺心。「泪欲潸」三字最见功力：「欲」字将落未落，泪水盈眶而强自忍住，比直写「泪下如雨」更见压抑之深、隐忍之痛——大悲恸处反无声，正是「欲潸」二字的神髓；「潸」字写泪之将下未下的状态，如泉欲涌而闸犹未启。此句由景入情，由「看山」的外景转入「惊心」的内情，一「强」一「欲」，皆写勉强与隐忍，将个人的悲恸层层内收，如弓之将引，为后二句的爆发蓄势。句中对仗（往事对惊心、泪对欲潸）自然天成，情感之沉痛与形式之工整相得益彰，是七绝次句的标准写法而情味独深。

Following the opening, the word past things names the root of the spring sorrow — no ordinary spring grief, but the concrete national disaster of the cession of Taiwan; the source of the grief stands revealed. Heart-shaken writes the shock of the past: the cession, the broken land, the lost homeland, remembering makes the heart start; two words condense the huge psychological impact of national disaster, a knife in the heart. Tears are about to fall is the masterful writing: the word about to, between falling and not, eyes brimming yet forcedly held, deeper than writing tears fall like rain, the suppressed grief, the held-back pain — at the greatest sorrow, there is no sound; this is the essence of about to fall. The word tear writes the state of weeping about to fall, like a spring about to burst while the sluice is not yet raised. The line moves from scene to feeling, from the outward looking at the hills to the inward heart-shaken; a forced and an about to, both writing effort and restraint, drawing personal grief inward layer by layer, like a bow drawn to the full, storing force for the burst of the last two lines. The matching of past things against heart-shaken and tears against about to fall is natural as nature, the grief and the formal craft each enhancing the other; the standard second line of the seven-character quatrain, with a peculiar depth of feeling.

四百万人同一哭

Four million people weep as one. The number '四百万' and the phrase '同一哭' (cry together) turn individual grief into a collective national trauma, creating a solemn and mournful atmosphere.

台湾四百万同胞同一声悲哭。

Four million people, in one voice, weep together.

此句由个人之泪放大为民族之哭，是全诗情感的爆发点，如闸门骤开。「四百万人」以实数入诗：台湾同胞四百万，同一时刻、同一悲恸、同声一哭——数字的精确赋予了悲痛以真实的重量，非「千万」「亿万」的泛说可比，是信史的笔法；「同一哭」三字，以「同」字写群体性：不是一人的哀泣，而是整座岛屿、整个民族的共哭，悲剧的广度由此铺开，如潮水般撼人心魄。此句的情感逻辑是递进的：首句一己之愁、次句一己之泪，至第三句骤然而起，化为四百万人的齐声恸哭——个人的悲恸汇入民族的悲恸，格局顿开，气势沉痛磅礴，如天风海雨扑面而来。「四百万」与「同一」并用，数字与副词相济，炼字极简而力量千钧，是近代诗以数字写集体创伤的典范之笔，其撼动力正在于将个体的痛放大为族群的痛。

The line enlarges personal tears into the weeping of a people, the emotional explosion of the poem, as if a sluice suddenly opened. Four million people takes a real number into verse: the four million people of Taiwan, in the same moment, in the same grief, weeping in one voice; the precision of the number gives the grief real weight, beyond the vague millions of myriad — the manner of reliable history. In one voice writes the collective with the word one: not one man's weeping, but the whole island, the whole nation's common cry; the breadth of tragedy spreads out, like a tide shaking the heart. The emotional logic is progressive: the first line one man's grief, the second one man's tears, the third suddenly rising into the unison weeping of four million — personal grief flowing into national grief, the scope opening at a stroke, the momentum somber and vast, like heaven's wind and sea's rain beating down. Four million and in one, number and adverb in balance, the diction minimal yet the force enormous; it is the model of modern poetry writing collective trauma through a number, its power lying precisely in magnifying individual pain into the pain of the people.

去年今日割台湾

On this day last year Taiwan was severed. This line reveals the root of the 'spring sorrow'—the cession of Taiwan under the Treaty of Shimonoseki in 1895. The precise date anchors the emotion in historical fact, leaving an enduring pang.

就在去年今日，朝廷把台湾割让给了日本。

On this very day last year, Taiwan was ceded away.

末句点明「春愁」「往事」的根源，以史笔收束全诗，是诗眼所在。「去年今日」以精确的时间刻度写记忆之深：不是「往岁」「昔日」的泛说，而是「去年今日」的准确对位——恰在一年前的今天，台湾被割让，时间越精确，创痛越具体，仿佛伤口刚刚切开，周年之祭、血痕犹新；「割台湾」三字直书其事，不用任何委婉修辞，「割」字写台湾如肉被割离母体，惨痛之状毕现，一字如刀，刺人肺腑——以「割」写领土之失，比「失」「让」更见其惨烈与被动。此句以最平淡的语言写最惨烈的事实，不着一字议论而悲愤自见，正是「不哭之哭、不痛之痛」：四百万人的哭声最终落定于这七个字上，史实如刀、余痛不绝。以精确日期入诗，开近代诗歌「诗史」纪实之先，其震撼力远胜空泛的悲叹，全诗至此戛然而止，而余痛绕梁百年。

The closing names the root of the spring sorrow and past things, closing the poem with a historian's brush, the poetic eye of the piece. On this very day last year writes the depth of memory in an exact measure of time: not the vague some year ago, the old days, but the exact correspondence of this very day last year — precisely one year ago today, Taiwan was ceded; the more exact the time, the more concrete the wound, as if the cut were fresh, the first anniversary, the blood marks still new. Ceded Taiwan writes the event direct, without euphemism; the word ceded writes Taiwan cut like flesh from the mother body, the agony visible, a single character like a knife piercing the breast — writing the loss of territory through ceded, far more cruel and passive than lost or yielded. The line writes the cruelest fact in the plainest language, without a word of argument, and the grief appears of itself: the weeping that does not weep, the pain that does not pain. The cry of four million people finally settles on these seven characters; the history is a knife, the after-pain unbroken. Taking an exact date into verse opens the documentary school of modern poetry as poetry-history, its force far exceeding vague lament; the poem stops short at this point, and the after-pain rings for a hundred years.

Study

Word focus

强 The character '强' in '春愁难遣强看山' means 'force oneself,' indicating the poet's struggle to manage his overwhelming grief and the ineffectiveness of distraction. 「春愁难遣强看山」之「强」（勉强）字，是全诗写愁的炼字之要，一字定全诗基调。「强看山」三字写愁绪难遣时的自我排解：明知看山难解愁，仍勉强为之，一个「强」字，将「无可奈何」的勉强之态写得入木三分，如重负在肩而强自挺立。此字之妙有三：一是写情，愁到极点的人才会「强」做某事，勉强之中愈见愁之深重，若无愁则何须「强」；二是反衬，「强看山」的结果是山色入目、反添怅惘，排解失败，愁上加愁，以「强」写「不能」，愈见愁之不可解，勉强之态愈可笑可悲；三是蓄势，「强」的勉强为下句「泪欲潸」的隐忍作铺垫——勉强看山、强忍泪水，皆是压抑，压抑愈深，后文四百万人的爆发愈烈，如弓弦愈引愈满。一字之「强」，写尽愁极无奈，是全诗情感的第一块基石，亦是七绝炼字于句首的成功范例。

惊心 In '往事惊心泪欲潸', '惊心' (heart-stirring) vividly captures the shock and agony caused by the memory of the national disaster. 「往事惊心」之「惊心」二字，凝练写出国难往事带来的震撼与创痛，是全诗由景入情的转折点。「惊」写突然的震动——往事猝不及防地袭上心头，令人心惊，如霹雳乍响；「心」字点明创痛之所在——不是浅表的伤感，而是直刺心脏的痛楚，痛入骨髓。二字连用，将「往事」（割台之变）的冲击力写得具体可感：山河破碎、同胞离散、故土沦丧，思之则心惊，念之则心痛，历史的创伤在「惊心」二字中有了切肤的质感，读者仿佛亦随之一震。与「泪欲潸」相连，更见其情感层次：先是「惊心」的震撼，继而是「欲潸」的悲恸，由震撼到落泪，情感的波澜层层推进，如石投水、涟漪渐开。「惊心」与「难遣」「强」「欲潸」诸词共同织成压抑沉痛的基调，为全诗的悲愤蓄势。炼字之妙，在以二字写尽心理创伤之巨，力重千钧，非亲历者不能道。

同一哭 In '四百万人同一哭', '同一哭' (cry together) unites individual sorrow into collective mourning. The combination of a large number with this phrase intensifies the sense of shared tragedy. 「四百万人同一哭」之「同一哭」三字，是全诗情感由个人升华为民族的关键，亦是全诗最撼人的三个字。「同」字写集体性：四百万同胞不是各自悲泣，而是同时同声、共此一哭——个人的悲痛在此汇入民族的悲痛，孤独的哀伤化为万众的号恸，悲剧的广度与情感的力度同时倍增，个体之泪因「同」而有了排山倒海之势；「一哭」写动作之齐一：四百万人的哭声汇成一声，如地动山摇，震撼苍穹，一个「哭」字直写悲恸之极致，不加修饰而力量自出。此三字的妙处在于以「同」字将分散的个体凝聚为整体，以「一」字将浩大的哭声化为一个意象，抽象的数字（四百万）与具体的动作（一哭）相结合，使悲剧既具统计学的真实，又具艺术化的震撼，读之如闻四百万人的哭声在耳畔响起。与末句「去年今日割台湾」相连，「同一哭」是果、「割台湾」是因，因果相续，悲愤之链环环相扣。

春愁