All poems

清 Qing · 文 Prose

病梅馆记·版本

Record of the Sick Plum Garden (Excerpt)

龚自珍

Gong Zizhen

托物言志Symbolic expression through objects 人才批判Critique of talent suppression 近代启蒙Early modern enlightenment 小品文Informal essay

江宁之龙蟠，苏州之邓尉，杭州之西溪，皆产梅。
或曰：梅以曲为美，直则无姿；
以欹为美，正则无景。

At Longpan in Jiangning, at Dengwei in Suzhou, and at Xixi in Hangzhou, all produce plum trees.
It is said: the plum is prized for being curved, for if straight it has no charm; it is prized for being tilted, for if upright it has no grace.

Listen

Meaning

The opening passage names three famed plum-growing regions of the Jiangnan area and then reports a perverse standard of appreciation: that a plum is beautiful only when curved or tilted, and lacking in charm when straight or upright. This sets the stage for the essay's later condemnation of how such a taste mutilates the trees.

江宁的龙蟠、苏州的邓尉、杭州的西溪，都出产梅花。有人说：梅花以弯曲为美，笔直了就没有姿态；以倾斜为美，端正了就没有景致。

Appreciation

This excerpt establishes the essay's premise with measured calm: it lists celebrated plum locales as if chatting familiarly, then introduces the distorted aesthetic standard through an anonymous 'some say.' The parallel phrasing and the casual authority of the stated rule quietly expose how a warped convention has become universally accepted, preparing the reader for the fierce indictment of talent-suppression to come.

【白话串讲】龚自珍写《病梅馆记》：江宁、苏州、杭州都产梅。“梅以曲为美，直则无姿”——文人画士欣赏被扭曲的梅。于是种梅人“斫其正，养其旁条”，把梅树弄病。龚自珍买下三百盆病梅，“纵之顺之，毁其盆，悉埋于地”——他疗梅，更想救天下被扭曲的人才。【意象与手法】起笔从容，如数家珍般铺陈三地名胜，看似闲笔，实则暗藏机锋：三地皆产梅，而三地之梅皆受同一审美标准之害，可见病梅之祸非一地一时之偶然，而是弥漫天下的痼疾。「或曰」二字尤其妙：不指明出处，正见此种论调之普遍——人人传之，竟不知始于何人，恰如流俗之成见。骈散相间的句式，抑扬顿挫，为下文「文人画士之祸之烈」蓄势。【情感与主旨】名为记梅，实为论人。曲欹为美的赏梅标准，暗喻病态的社会对人才的戕害——斫正、删密、锄直，正是封建末世摧残正直人才的写照。龚自珍借「病梅」呼吁「纵之顺之，毁其盆，悉埋于地」，让梅恢复天然之姿，寄托其解放人才、恢复天性的近代启蒙思想。【名句点睛】「梅以曲为美，直则无姿；以欹为美，正则无景」一组对句，是全篇立论之基：以「曲直欹正」四字相对，把畸形审美写得冠冕堂皇，正话反说，愈见其荒谬。此句与《己亥杂诗》「我劝天公重抖擞，不拘一格降人才」异曲同工，同为呼唤人才解放的时代强音。

Background

Gong Zizhen (1792–1841), styled Seren, also known by his studio name Ding'an, was a native of Renhe in Zhejiang. A thinker and man of letters of the Qing dynasty, he was a pioneer of early modern enlightenment thought. Having passed the provincial examination at twenty-seven and the metropolitan examination at thirty-eight, he long languished in minor posts as a secretary in the Grand Secretariat and a clerk in the Ministry of Rites, frustrated and unfulfilled all his life. In the nineteenth year of the Daoguang reign (1839) he resigned and returned south, and died suddenly two years later at Danyang. 'Record of the Sick Plum Garden' was written around the time of his resignation, a mature work of his late period, paired with his 'Poems of the Jihai Year' of the same year—'I urge the Lord of Heaven to tremble again and send down talent of every kind.' By the Daoguang era the Qing dynasty had entered its twilight: the eight-legged essay constrained scholars' minds, the textual scholarship of the Qianlong and Jiaqing reigns grew trivial, and officialdom ran on flattery. In essays such as 'On the Bright and the Good' and 'Discussions in the Yibing Period' Gong had already condemned how 'when a gifted scholar or citizen appears, a hundred useless men bind and fetter him, until they destroy him.' This essay adopts the image of the 'sick plum': the standard that prizes 'curvature and tilt' allegorizes a talent standard that values servility and smoothness; the pruning, thinning, and uprooting of the plums allegorizes the mutilation and distortion of upright talent. Gong advocated 'setting them free and letting them be as they are,' destroying the pots and planting them in the earth, so that plums recover their natural form—an idea that anticipated modern individualism.

龚自珍（1792—1841），字璱人，号定盦，浙江仁和人，清代思想家、文学家，近代启蒙思潮的先驱。他二十七岁中举，三十八岁中进士，长期沉沦下僚，任内阁中书、礼部主事等闲职，一生郁郁不得志，于道光十九年（1839）辞官南归，两年后暴卒于丹阳。《病梅馆记》约作于道光十九年辞官前后，是龚自珍晚年思想成熟期的代表作，与其同年所作《己亥杂诗》「我劝天公重抖擞，不拘一格降人才」互为表里。道光年间，清王朝已入末世：科举以八股取士，束缚士人思想；乾嘉考据之学，务为琐碎；官场上下阿谀奉承，阿谀者为能，正直者为迂。龚自珍在《明良论》《乙丙之际箸议》等文中，已痛斥「才士与才民出，则百不才督之缚之，以至于戮之」，对扼杀人才的社会机制有清醒认识。本文借「病梅」立象：以「曲欹」为美的赏梅标准，暗喻封建末世以奴性、圆滑为美德的人才标准；以梅之被斫、删、夭、锄，暗喻正直之才被摧残、被扭曲、被扼杀。龚自珍主张「纵之顺之」，让梅与人都恢复天然本性，其思想已开近代个性解放之先声。

Art

This piece is a model of Qing informal essay, its artistic core being 'expressing intent through objects, using the plum to represent the person.' It opens by enumerating place names—'At Longpan in Jiangning, at Dengwei in Suzhou, and at Xixi in Hangzhou, all produce plum trees'—three regions, three clauses, balanced and measured, cataloguing the famous plum locales as if chatting familiarly. This seemingly idle listing secretly harbors a thrust: all three places produce plums, and the plums of all three will suffer the same standard, showing that the plague of the sick plum is no local accident but a pervasive disease of the age. The word 'all' (jie) in 'all produce plum trees' seems plain yet is a planted clue. Then 'some say' introduces the standard: 'the plum is prized for being curved...' The word 'some' (huo) names no source—precisely because such talk is universal, everyone repeats it, no one knows who began it, like a common prejudice. The balanced four-character contrasts of 'curved/straight, tilted/upright' state the diseased aesthetic with perfect confidence, saying the reverse to expose its absurdity. In syntax the paired clauses first set the standard then state the consequence, logically tight yet relaxed, building tension for the later outburst against 'the ravages of literati and painters.' The whole moves from calm to fervent, from exposition to argument—a model of 'narrate first, then argue.'

本文是清代小品文的典范，其艺术核心在「托物言志、以梅喻人」。起笔以地名铺陈——「江宁之龙蟠，苏州之邓尉，杭州之西溪，皆产梅」，三地三句，句式齐整，如数家珍，把产梅胜地一一罗列，为后文「江浙之梅皆病」张本：越是名梅产地，病梅之祸越烈，则此祸之普遍更触目惊心。「皆产梅」的「皆」字，看似平淡，实为伏笔——三地皆产梅，而三地之梅将皆病。接着以「或曰」引出赏梅标准：「梅以曲为美，直则无姿；以欹为美，正则无景。」「或」字不指明出处，妙味无穷——此种论调无主名而人人传诵，恰见流俗成见之深入人心；「曲直欹正」四字两两相对，骈偶工整，把病态的审美说得理直气壮，正话反说，愈显其荒谬。句法上，「以曲为美，直则无姿；以欹为美，正则无景」是典型的对偶句，先立标准，后言后果，逻辑严整而文气从容，为下文「文人画士之祸之烈」的激愤蓄势。全文由平缓而激切，由铺陈而议论，节奏分明，是「先叙后议、以叙引议」的典范。

Allusions

The deeper significance lies in the cultural tradition carried by the plum image and Gong's subversion of it. In traditional culture the plum has long symbolized 'purity and steadfastness': Lin Bu's lofty solitude of 'plum as wife, crane as child,' Lu You's perseverance that 'even ground to dust, its fragrance remains'—both use the plum's defiance of snow to signify the gentleman's integrity. Gong's record, however, writes of the plum's 'sickness'—to flatter the 'curved and tilted' taste, the plum is chopped, thinned, and uprooted, losing its nature and retaining only a morbid posture. This is a profound irony against the traditional 'plum-appreciation' discourse: so-called 'curved and tilted as beauty' is really prizing the sick; the so-called 'sick plum' is the outward manifestation of the literati-painters' own diseased taste. Deeper still, this record carries on the tradition of 'expressing intent through objects' (like Han Yu's 'On Horses,' using the horse to represent talent) yet goes further: 'On Horses' only laments 'fine horses are common, but a Bole is rare,' whereas this record points directly at the mechanism that destroys talent itself—not merely the absence of a Bole, but the very knives that 'chop the straight, thin the dense, uproot the upright.' Gong offers 'healing the plum' and 'letting it be' as the way out, advocating the recovery of natural disposition; his thought grows from the critical spirit of Huang Zongxi and Gu Yanwu and opens the way to modern 'individual liberation.' The single plum image thus shifts from hermit seclusion to awakened resistance.

本文的深层意蕴，在于梅这一意象所承载的文化传统与龚自珍对它的反用。梅在传统文化中素来是「清高、坚贞」的象征：林逋「梅妻鹤子」之孤高，陆游「零落成泥碾作尘，只有香如故」之坚守，皆以梅之傲雪凌霜喻君子之节操。而龚自珍此记，却写出了梅之「病」——为迎合「曲欹」之审美，梅被斫正删密、锄直遏气，失其天然，只剩病态之姿。这是对传统「赏梅」话语的深刻反讽：所谓「曲欹为美」，实为以病态为美；所谓「病梅」，实为「文人画士」审美之病的外化。更深一层，此记承托物言志传统（如韩愈《马说》以马喻才）而更进：马说只叹「千里马常有，而伯乐不常有」，此记则直指摧残人才的机制本身——不仅无伯乐，更有「斫直、删密、锄正」的屠刀。龚自珍以「疗梅」「纵之顺之」为出路，主张恢复天性，其思想根源于明清之际黄宗羲、顾炎武的批判精神，又开近代「个性解放」之先河，梅之一象，遂由隐逸清高转为觉醒抗争。

Commentary

'Record of the Sick Plum Garden' is a representative work of Gong Zizhen's prose and a milestone of modern Chinese essay. Written on the eve of the Opium War, its first value is ideological: using the 'sick plum' as a metaphor, it pinpoints with piercing clarity the universal mechanism by which the late feudal age destroyed talent, shifting the critical edge from the individual 'absence of a Bole' to the institutional 'chopping the straight and thinning the dense.' Its enlightenment significance surpasses all contemporary writing on talent and flows in the same current as the reform thought of Wei Yuan, Kang Youwei, and Liang Qichao. Second is its literary merit: under two hundred characters, yet with a clear theme, striking imagery, and fluctuating rhythm—the extreme of symbolic informal essay; the paired line 'the plum is prized for being curved, for if straight it has no charm' is as compact as a proverb and still recited today. After Gong's death the essay's influence grew: during the May Fourth period, the anti-feudal and individuality-affirming calls of the New Culture writers (such as Lu Xun) echoed its critical spirit; contemporary scholarship regards it as a seminal text of China's modern 'awakening of the individual.' Since the late Qing it has been included in many anthologies, and its 'sick plum' image has become a common Chinese symbol for criticizing the suppression of human nature and the mutilation of talent—from late Qing to the present, the metaphor endures, proof of the essay's timeless intellectual vitality.

《病梅馆记》是龚自珍散文的代表作，也是中国近代散文的里程碑之一。此文写于鸦片战争前夜，其价值首先在思想：以「病梅」为喻，一针见血地指出封建末世摧残人才的普遍机制，将批判锋芒从个别的「无伯乐」推向制度性的「斫直删密」，其启蒙意义超越同时代一切论才文字，与魏源、康有为、梁启超的变法思想一脉相承。其次在文学：全文不足两百字而主旨鲜明、意象警拔、文气跌宕，是「托物言志」小品文的极致；「梅以曲为美，直则无姿」一组对句，凝练如格言，至今传诵。龚自珍死后，此文影响日隆：五四时期，新文化运动诸家（如鲁迅）反封建、倡个性的主张，与《病梅馆记》的批判精神遥相呼应；当代学界更视之为中国近代「人的觉醒」的先声文献。文章自清末以来入选多种教材选本，其「病梅」意象更成为汉语中批判压抑人性、戕害人才的通用符号——从晚清到当代，「病梅」之喻历久弥新，足证此文超越时代的思想生命力。

Prosody

Form Qing informal prose (mixed parallel and loose style)清代小品散文（骈散相间）

Rhyme Not rhymed; it uses parallel couplets and functional particles to modulate tone. The opening three parallel clauses 'At Longpan in Jiangning, at Dengwei in Suzhou, at Xixi in Hangzhou' ring evenly like strung pearls; the three characters 'all produce plum trees' close with a crisp stop. From 'some say' on it turns to parallel clauses: 'prized for being curved' against 'if straight, no charm,' 'prized for being tilted' against 'if upright, no grace'—two peaks facing off, rising and falling with measured cadence, like metal striking stone.不押韵，以骈偶句法与虚词调节声情。开篇「江宁之龙蟠，苏州之邓尉，杭州之西溪」三句排比，音节齐整如贯珠；「皆产梅」三字收束，顿挫斩截。「或曰」以下转入对偶句：「以曲为美」对「直则无姿」，「以欹为美」对「正则无景」，双峰对峙，抑扬有致，读来如金石相击。

Tone pattern The sentence pattern shifts from loose to parallel: place names in loose clauses, relaxed and expansive; the standard in parallel clauses, tight and refined. The two words 'some say' are the pivot of the textual energy, turning from narration to argument; the four characters 'curved, straight, tilted, upright' interlock pairwise, their syllables sharp. The whole passage moves from calm to gradually cold and stern—under a surface of tranquil narration lurks an ironic edge.句式先散后骈：铺陈地名用散句，从容舒展；转述标准用骈句，严整凝练。「或曰」二字是文气的转捩点，由叙事转入议论；「曲」「直」「欹」「正」四字两两交错，音节峭拔。全段语调由平缓而渐趋冷峻，表面的平静叙述之下，暗涌着讽刺的锋芒。

Reading note The beauty of this passage lies in 'using parallel structure to state the absurd, using composure to mask fervor.' The opening three clauses, six characters each, with place names in two-character beats, are gentle and clear, like reciting treasured names. After the three parallel clauses, the three characters 'all produce plum trees' close independently, the rhythm pausing like closing an account, crisp and decisive. At 'some say,' the energy turns: 'some' rises lightly, 'say' falls heavily, as if a whisper in the ear; then the four parallel clauses, each five characters, rhythm neat and sharp—'curved' against 'straight,' 'tilted' against 'upright'—every word counterpoised, syllables like cymbals, stating the diseased standard with perfect confidence. On the surface a calm report; listen closely and it is cold irony—the more orderly and resonant, the more absurd the standard. Gong uses the alternating parallel-loose rhythm to lay groundwork, then argue, then build tension, setting the fuse for the later thunderous wrath against 'the ravages of literati and painters'—a rhythm uniquely his own.本文声情之美，在「以骈偶写荒谬，以从容掩激愤」。开篇「江宁之龙蟠，苏州之邓尉，杭州之西溪」三句，每句六字，地名二字一顿，音节舒缓清朗，如数家珍——「江宁」「龙蟠」「苏州」「邓尉」「杭州」「西溪」六个地名连珠而出，声调抑扬，把产梅胜地之盛写得气象安详。三句排比后，「皆产梅」三字独立收束，节奏一顿，如总账入册，斩截利落。至「或曰」二字，文气一转：「或」字轻起，「曰」字重落，仿佛有人附耳相告；随后「梅以曲为美，直则无姿；以欹为美，正则无景」四句骈偶，每句五字（「直则无姿」「正则无景」四字），节奏整饬而峭拔——「曲」对「直」、「欹」对「正」，「美」对「姿」、「景」对「美」，字字相抵，音节如铙钹相击，把病态标准说得理直气壮、掷地有声。表面读来，是平和的转述；细听其声，实为冷峭的反讽——越是整齐铿锵，越见标准之荒谬。龚自珍以骈散相间的节奏，先铺陈、后立论、再蓄势，为下文「文人画士之祸之烈」的雷霆之怒铺好了引线，正是桐城派「气盛言宜」之外，定盦独有的峭拔声情。

Line by line

江宁之龙蟠，苏州之邓尉，杭州之西溪，皆产梅。

At Longpan in Jiangning, at Dengwei in Suzhou, and at Xixi in Hangzhou, all produce plum trees. (Note: The opening enumerates three famous plum regions with balanced, repeated place names; the seemingly plain 'all' foreshadows the later 'all are sick,' establishing that the plague of the sick plum is universal across the celebrated plum lands.)

江宁的龙蟠里、苏州的邓尉山、杭州的西溪，这些地方都出产梅花。

Longpan in Jiangning, Dengwei Hill in Suzhou, Xixi in Hangzhou: these places all produce plum blossoms.

开篇三句铺陈产梅胜地，句式齐整、地名连举，看似平淡的叙事，实含三重深意。其一，以三地之名梅产地，为后文「江浙之梅皆病」张本——越是名梅之乡，梅之「病」越烈，则此祸的普遍性越触目惊心，「皆产梅」的「皆」字与后文「皆病」遥相呼应，一字定下全文基调。其二，江宁、苏州、杭州皆江南人文渊薮，文人画士荟萃之地，产梅于此，正与「文人画士之祸」对榫——梅之产地即祸之源头，地理铺陈暗藏逻辑关联。其三，「龙蟠」「邓尉」「西溪」三地名，皆清雅可诵，音节铿锵，三句排比而出，如画卷徐展，把产梅之盛写得气象万千，为后文「病梅」之惨作反衬——愈盛愈病，其痛愈深。龚自珍以闲笔起势，而字字皆有伏脉，是「起笔从容、暗藏机锋」的大家手笔。

The opening three lines enumerate the plum grounds, the sentences regular, the place names listed, a plain narrative that in fact holds three layers of meaning. First, naming the famous plum regions stores ground for the later all the plums of Jiangsu and Zhejiang are sick: the more famous the plum country, the more virulent the sickness, and the more shocking its universality; the word all in all three grow plum trees echoes the later all are sick, one character fixing the tone of the whole. Second, Jiangning, Suzhou, and Hangzhou are the very seats of Jiangnan letters, where literati and painters gather; that plums grow here exactly fits the disaster of the literati-painters: the plum country is the source of the trouble, the geography hiding the logic. Third, the three names Longpan, Dengwei, Xixi are all elegant and sonorous; the three parallel lines unfold like a painting, writing the splendor of the plum grounds as a foil to the misery of the sick plum: the more splendid, the sicker, the deeper the pain. Gong Zizhen opens with a careless hand, yet every character has its buried thread: the master's art of a calm opening with hidden points.

或曰：梅以曲为美，直则无姿；以欹为美，正则无景。

Someone said: the plum is prized for being curved, for if straight it has no charm; it is prized for being tilted, for if upright it has no grace. (Note: The anonymous 'someone said' shows this standard is nameless yet universally repeated—a deep-rooted prejudice. The parallel clause states a morbid aesthetic with perfect confidence, reversing right and wrong; Gong records it flatly and lets its absurdity reveal itself, a masterful use of saying the reverse to satirize.)

有人说：梅花以弯曲为美，笔直了就没有姿态；以倾斜为美，端正了就没有景致。

Some say: the plum is beautiful when twisted, and straight branches have no grace; beautiful when leaning, and upright branches have no charm.

此句以「或曰」引出赏梅标准，是全篇立论的基石。「或」字不指明出处，妙味无穷：此种论调无主名而人人传诵，正是流俗成见深入人心的表现——说不清是谁说的，却人人都信，愈见其牢不可破。「梅以曲为美，直则无姿；以欹为美，正则无景」一组对偶，句式工整，逻辑严密：先立标准（以曲为美），后言后果（直则无姿），把病态的审美说得冠冕堂皇、理直气壮。细味其言：「曲」「欹」皆非天然之姿，而是人为扭曲之态；「无姿」「无景」则以「直」「正」为病，是非颠倒，黑白混淆。龚自珍不置一贬词，只如实转述，而荒谬自见——正话反说的讽刺力量，远胜直斥。此句所立「标准」，正是下文「斫其正，养其旁条；删其密，夭其稚枝；锄其直，遏其生气」的病因，也是「文人画士之祸之烈」的根源，一句立骨，全篇生发。

The line introduces, through some say, the standard of plum appreciation, the foundation of the essay's argument. The word some, unnamed, is infinitely suggestive: this view has no author, yet everyone repeats it, which is precisely how vulgar prejudice digs in, no one can say who first said it, yet all believe it, the more unshakable. The parallel, beautiful when twisted, and straight branches have no grace; beautiful when leaning, and upright branches have no charm, is tightly built: first the standard, beautiful when twisted, then the consequence, straight branches have no grace, arguing the diseased aesthetic as if it were proper reason. Tasted closely: twisted and leaning are not natural forms but humanly distorted attitudes; no grace and no charm condemn the straight and upright as sickness, right and wrong inverted, black and white confounded. Gong Zizhen adds not one word of blame, only reports the view faithfully, and the absurdity appears of itself; the satirical force of saying the right thing as if it were wrong far outstrips direct condemnation. The standard set here is the very cause of the later chop the upright, nourish the side twigs, prune the dense, stunt the young shoots, weed out the straight, stop the living breath, and the root of how grievous is the disaster of the literati-painters; one line sets the bone from which the whole essay grows.

Study

Word focus

曲 'Curved.' In 'the plum is prized for being curved,' this is the first keyword of the essay's aesthetic critique. Originally neutral, here 'curved' becomes the standard of beauty—but only by denying the natural form: the plum grows straight, yet is forced to bend to be 'beautiful,' and 'if straight, no charm' condemns the upright natural state as 'charmless,' a complete inversion. In Chinese 'qu' also carries 'compromise' and 'sycophancy'—to be curved is to be submissive. The 'curved' prized by the diseased aesthetic is exactly the servile personality the late feudal age promoted. Hence this one word is both a standard for viewing plums and for judging talent—a double pun pointing at a society that prizes servility as beauty. 「梅以曲为美」之「曲」，是全文审美批判的第一个关键词。「曲」训弯曲、委曲，本为中性之词，此处却成为「美」的标准——而这一标准的前提，恰恰是对天然之姿的否定：梅本直生，强曲之以为美；「直则无姿」四字，更把正直天然之态判为「无姿」，是非颠倒至极。龚自珍选「曲」字立论，深意在于：「曲」在汉语中兼有「委曲求全」「曲学阿世」之义——曲者，屈也。病态审美所推崇的「曲」，正是封建末世所提倡的奴性人格：如藤如蔓，随风而曲，绝无挺立之姿。后文「斫其正」「锄其直」之所以发生，正是因为「曲」成了美的标准。故「曲」之一字，既是赏梅之病态标准，又是论才之病态标准，一字双关，直指「以奴性为美」的社会痼疾。

欹 'Tilted / off-center.' In 'prized for being tilted,' it means leaning, not upright—the twin of 'curved,' together forming the 'curved and tilted' posture. The word is exquisitely chosen: 'qi' originally denotes a vessel leaning askew (as in the 'qi vessel' of antiquity—empty it leans, balanced it stands straight, full it overturns, used to teach moderation). Gong uses 'qi' for the plum, hinting that just as the qi-vessel is 'not upright,' the plum's 'qi' is its branch not straight, yet the world prizes this as beauty—taking the sick as normal. 'If upright, no grace' pairs with 'if straight, no charm,' casting both uprightness and straightness into the realm of charmless—the inversion of the diseased aesthetic is fully visible in these two words. Moreover 'qi' is an uncommon character, whose sharp syllable matches the essay's cold, fervent tone. 「以欹为美」之「欹」，训倾斜、不正，是「曲」的孪生词，合为「曲欹」之态。此字用得极精：欹之本义，即器之不正而斜倚者，如《礼记》所谓「欹器」——虚则欹，中则正，满则覆，古人以欹器寓持满戒盈之训。龚自珍取「欹」字言梅，暗含机锋：欹器之「欹」是器之不正，梅之「欹」是枝之不正，而世人偏以此为美，恰似以病态为常态。「正则无景」与「直则无姿」相对，把「正」与「直」一并打入无景无姿之列——直正皆弃，曲欹独尊，病态审美之颠倒，于此二字见之。且「欹」为生僻字，用在此处，音节峭拔，冷峻有力，正合全文激愤冷峭的笔调，与后文「夭梅病梅」的惨酷相表里。

皆产梅 'All produce plum trees.' Seemingly plain, these three characters are the first planted clue of the whole essay. 'All' (jie) means 'every, entirely'; three regions named and one 'all' sums them up—every famous plum land, not one omitted. This 'all' echoes the later 'all the plums of Jiang-Zhe are sick': what produces plums in abundance is sick in abundance. Deeper, 'all' hints that this plague is no local accident but a pervasive disease of the age. Gong writes 'all' for the breadth of plum-producing lands, then 'all' for the intensity of the sickness—two 'alls' from exposition to critique, immense force. Replace 'all' with 'many' or 'abundant' and the force leaks; only 'all' is decisive, revealing the essay's fervent undertone. 「皆产梅」三字，看似平淡，实为全文伏脉之始。「皆」训全、都，三地连举而一「皆」字总括——江宁龙蟠产梅，苏州邓尉产梅，杭州西溪产梅，天下名梅之地，无一处遗漏。而此「皆」字正与后文「江浙之梅皆病」之「皆」遥相呼应：皆产梅者皆病梅，产之愈盛，病之愈烈，两个「皆」字如两记重锤，先扬后抑，把名梅之乡尽数拖入病梅之列。更深一层，「皆」字暗示此种审美之祸非一地一时之偶然，而是弥漫天下的普遍痼疾——三地之名梅尚且如此，况天下乎？龚自珍以一「皆」字写产梅之广，复以一「皆」字写病梅之烈，两「皆」相映，从铺陈到批判，笔力万钧。若易「皆」为「多」「盛」，则气泄矣；唯「皆」字斩截无余，方见全篇激愤之底色。