南北朝 Northern and Southern Dynasties · 赋 Fu rhapsody
哀江南赋·序
Lament for the South: Preface
粤以戊辰之年，建亥之月，大盗移国，金陵瓦解。
余乃窜身荒谷，公私涂炭。
华阳奔命，有去无归。
中兴道销，穷于甲戌。
三日哭于都亭，三年囚于别馆。
天道周星，物极不反。
傅燮之但悲身世，无处求生；
袁安之每念王室，自然流涕。
Show full original poem
粤以戊辰之年，建亥之月，大盗移国，金陵瓦解。
余乃窜身荒谷，公私涂炭。
华阳奔命，有去无归。
中兴道销，穷于甲戌。
三日哭于都亭，三年囚于别馆。
天道周星，物极不反。
傅燮之但悲身世，无处求生；
袁安之每念王室，自然流涕。
昔桓君山志士之为，杜元凯之平生最乐，并事周室，而俱为诸侯之相；
班仲升之属国，王仲宣之去家，并仕亡命，而皆逢丧乱之朝。
将军一去，大树飘零；
壮士不还，寒风萧瑟。
荆璧睨柱，受连城而见欺；
载书横阶，捧珠盘而不定。
钟仪君子，入就南冠之囚；
季孙行人，留守西河之馆。
申包胥之顿地，碎之以首；
蔡威公之泪尽，加之以血。
钓台移柳，非玉关之可望；
华亭鹤唳，岂河桥之可闻！
孙策以天下为三分，众才一旅；
项籍以江东之八千，遂分两河。
嗟乎！
山岳崩颓，既履危亡之运；
春秋迭代，必有去故之悲。
天意人事，可以凄怆伤心者矣！
况复舟楫路穷，星汉非乘槎可上；
风飙道阻，蓬莱无可到之期。
穷者欲达其言，劳者须歌其事。
陆士衡闻而抚掌，是所甘心；
张平子见而陋之，固其宜矣。
In the past, Huan Junshan's ambition, Du Yuankai's lifelong joy—both served the Zhou court and became ministers to the lords; Ban Zhongsheng's dependency, Wang Zhongxuan's departure from home—both served in exile, yet both encountered eras of chaos. The general is gone; the great tree withers. The brave warrior does not return; the cold wind sighs. The Jing jade was held against a pillar, deceived despite a chain of cities; the covenant was inscribed across the steps, the pearl basin lifted but not settled. Zhong Yi, a gentleman, became a prisoner wearing the southern cap; Ji Sun, an envoy, was detained in the lodge at West River. Shen Baoxu struck his head on the ground, crushing it; Cai Weigong's tears were exhausted, followed by blood. The migrating willows at Diaoyutai cannot be seen from Yumen Pass; the crane cries at Huating cannot be heard at Heqiao!
Sun Ce divided the realm into three parts with an army of only a hundred; Xiang Ji, with eight thousand from Jiangdong, split the two rivers. Alas! Mountains crumble and peaks collapse; having encountered the fate of peril and ruin; the cycles of spring and autumn bring inevitable grief for the past. The will of Heaven and human affairs—enough to grieve and wound the heart! Moreover, oars and boats reach the road's end; the Milky Way cannot be ascended by raft. The windstorm obstructs the way; Penglai has no date to be reached. The impoverished wish to express their words; the toiling must sing of their deeds. Lu Ji hearing this and clapping his hands—that I gladly accept; Zhang Heng seeing it and deeming it vulgar—that is only fitting.
Meaning
The preface recounts the fall of Jinling (Nanjing) in the Hou Jing rebellion, the author's flight and subsequent captivity in the north, and his grief over the destruction of the Liang dynasty and his own exile. It explains the purpose of writing the 'Lament for the South' as a way for the destitute and toiling to voice their sorrow.
在戊辰年（梁太清二年，548）十月，侯景之乱颠覆国家，金陵陷落。我逃身荒谷，公室私家皆遭涂炭。奔命于华阳（江陵），有去无归。中兴之望消亡，困厄于甲戌之年。在都亭三日痛哭，于别馆三年被羁。天道循环，物极不反。傅燮只是悲叹身世，无处求生；袁安每念王室，自然落泪。从前桓谭志士的作为、杜预平生最乐之事，都辅佐周室而为诸侯之相；班超的属国、王粲的离乡，都逢丧乱之朝。将军一去，大树飘零；壮士不返，寒风萧瑟。蔺相如睨柱，受连城之欺；毛遂捧盘，定盟而难安。钟仪为君子，入为南冠之囚；季孙为行人，留居西河之馆。申包胥顿地碎首；蔡威公泪尽流血。钓台移柳，非玉门关外可望；华亭鹤唳，岂河桥之畔可闻！孙策以天下三分，众仅一旅；项籍率江东八千，遂分两河。唉！山岳崩颓，既逢危亡之运；春秋迭代，必有去故之悲。天意人事，足以凄怆伤心！何况舟楫路穷，星汉非乘槎可上；风飙道阻，蓬莱无可到之期。穷者欲达其言，劳者须歌其事。陆机闻而抚掌，是我甘心；张衡见而鄙陋，本其宜也。
Appreciation
Background: Yu Xin, courtesy name Zishan, was a native of Xinye, Nanyang. In 554 CE, he was sent as an envoy to Western Wei, which then captured Jiangling, ending the Liang dynasty. Yu Xin remained in the north, eventually holding high office. This fu recalls the fall of the Liang and his own wandering. The preface opens with the line 'The great rebel uprooted the state, Jinling crumbled,' then narrates his flight and imprisonment. A series of allusions to historical figures like Fu Xie, Yuan An, Jing Ke, Zhong Yi, and Shen Baoxu convey the pain of national ruin and exile. The final comparison of Sun Ce and Xiang Ji, followed by the lament over collapsing mountains and the cycles of time, culminates in the declaration that the poor must speak and the laborer must sing, revealing the fu's purpose. Artistic features: The parallel prose style is dense with allusions yet flows with momentum. The preface, written in fu form, carries the weight of national and personal sorrow, blending individual experience with the era's rise and fall. Its deep melancholy and desolation foreshadow Tang lyrical fu, and Du Fu's praise—'Yu Xin's writings mature with age'—points to this very quality.
【白话串讲】 “大盗移国，金陵瓦解”——庾信写梁朝灭亡：金陵陷落，他成了俘虏。这篇赋的序言，是中国文学里写亡国之痛最深沉的一篇。 【意象与手法】 序文以骈俪为体而气盛词断，四六句法严整却无板滞之病。用典如贯珠：傅燮、袁安写亡国之悲，钟仪、季孙写羁囚之辱，申包胥、蔡威公写思归之切，层层铺染而情感递进。「将军一去，大树飘零；壮士不还，寒风萧瑟」以对仗写物是人非；末段「舟楫路穷」「蓬莱无期」以神话反衬归途断绝，将家国之痛写得沉郁顿挫，苍凉无比。 【情感与主旨】 《哀江南赋》作于庾信羁留北朝后期。梁太清二年（548）侯景乱起，繁华金陵灰飞烟灭；承圣三年（554）庾信出使西魏，旋即江陵陷落、梁室倾覆，信因被强留北方，历仕西魏、北周，位望通显而乡关万里。赋前小序自述作意，实为一篇浓缩的梁亡史与个人创伤史。 【名句点睛】 「大盗移国，金陵瓦解」以四字史笔定调亡国之痛；「将军一去，大树飘零；壮士不还，寒风萧瑟」对仗工稳而意象萧瑟；「穷者欲达其言，劳者须歌其事」点明作赋主旨，皆为常考之句。
Background
The 'Lament for the South' was composed during Yu Xin's later years while detained in the north. In the second year of the Taiqing era of Liang (548), the Hou Jing rebellion erupted, reducing the flourishing Jinling to ashes. In 554 (the third year of Chengsheng), while Yu Xin was on a mission to Western Wei, Jiangling fell and Liang collapsed. Yu Xin was forcibly retained in the north, serving Western Wei and Northern Zhou, reaching high official rank yet yearning for his homeland a thousand miles away. This preface narrates the period from 'the great rebel uprooted the state, Jinling crumbled' to 'three years imprisoned in a separate lodge,' presenting in blood and tears the motivation for writing. It is a condensed history of Liang's fall and personal trauma.
《哀江南赋》是庾信羁留北朝后期所作的骈赋名篇，其序文尤为著名。庾信（513—581），字子山，南阳新野人，梁朝宫体诗人庾肩吾之子，早年与徐陵并称「徐庾」，为梁朝宫廷文学的代表。梁太清二年（548）侯景之乱爆发，繁华的金陵灰飞烟灭，梁武帝饿死台城，庾信仓皇奔命，历经丧乱；承圣三年（554）庾信出使西魏，恰逢西魏攻陷江陵，梁元帝出降被杀，梁室倾覆，庾信遂被强留北方，历仕西魏、北周，官至骠骑大将军、开府仪同三司，位望通显而乡关万里，有家难归。赋前小序自述「大盗移国，金陵瓦解」至「三年囚于别馆」的遭际，交代作赋之由：以血泪之笔写国破家亡、身世飘零的巨痛，实为一篇浓缩的梁亡史与个人创伤史。此序是理解《哀江南赋》全篇的钥匙，也是研究庾信「暮年诗赋动江关」心路历程的第一手材料。又，庾信早年仕梁，为宫体诗「徐庾体」的代表，诗风绮艳；晚年羁北，历仕西魏北周，虽位望通显，然乡关之思、亡国之痛郁结于心，诗赋为之一变，杜甫「庾信文章老更成，凌云健笔意纵横」正指此变，此序正是其后期「沉郁苍凉」风格的集中体现，也是六朝文学由绮丽转向沉郁的标志性作品。
Art
The preface employs parallel prose with a balanced four-six syllable rhythm, yet avoids stiffness. Allusions are strung like pearls: Fu Xie and Yuan An depict the grief of national ruin; Zhong Yi and Ji Sun illustrate the humiliation of captivity; Shen Baoxu and Cai Weigong convey the desire to return. The layers of allusion intensify the emotion. The couplet 'The general is gone; the great tree withers. The brave warrior does not return; the cold wind sighs' uses parallelism to express change and loss. The final lines 'boats and oars reach the road's end' and 'Penglai has no date to be reached' use myth to contrast the impossibility of return, rendering the national sorrow with deep melancholy and desolation.
序文以骈俪为体而气盛词断，四六句法严整却无板滞之病，是六朝骈文的巅峰之作。章法上，全文三段层层递进：首段自叙身世，从「大盗移国，金陵瓦解」的史笔起笔，历数窜身荒谷、华阳奔命、三年囚于别馆的遭遇，以「傅燮之但悲身世」「袁安之每念王室」的用典写亡国之悲；中段铺陈历史人物，以桓谭、杜预、班超、王粲等前人事迹写丧乱之世人才之厄，「将军一去，大树飘零；壮士不还，寒风萧瑟」以对仗写物是人非，钟仪、季孙写羁囚之辱，申包胥、蔡威公写思归之切，层层铺染而情感递进；末段由历史回到现实，「山岳崩颓」「春秋迭代」写家国兴亡，「舟楫路穷」「蓬莱无期」以神话反衬归途断绝，结以「穷者欲达其言，劳者须歌其事」点明作赋之旨。全序用典如贯珠，对仗精工而气脉贯通，将家国之痛写得沉郁顿挫，苍凉无比。序文用典之密集、对仗之精工，为六朝骈文之冠，然其最高处不在雕琢而在气韵：「大盗移国」的史笔、「三日哭于都亭」的悲恸、「将军一去，大树飘零」的苍凉、「穷者欲达其言」的自明，四层情感一线贯穿，骈四俪六的形式非但未束缚情感，反使悲愤在工整的对仗中愈显沉郁，正是「以骈文写血泪」的至境。
Allusions
Allusions are dense and all personally relevant: 'Fu Xie only grieved for his own fate' refers to Fu Xie of Eastern Han who lamented his circumstances before death; 'Yuan An... naturally shed tears' recalls Yuan An who wept for the state in snow; 'Jing jade held against a pillar' alludes to Lin Xiangru's successful return of the jade; 'Zhong Yi... southern cap' comes from the Zuo Commentary about a Chu prisoner; 'Shen Baoxu struck his head' refers to his weeping at the Qin court; 'migrating willows at Diaoyutai' and 'crane cries at Huating' allude to Ding Gu and Lu Ji, expressing the impossibility of seeing home. Not a single allusion is irrelevant.
序文典故密布而皆切身世，无一字虚设。「傅燮之但悲身世」用东汉傅燮临难悲叹之典，傅燮为汉末忠臣，战死前悲叹身世，无处求生，正合庾信国破家亡之悲；「袁安之每念王室」用东汉袁安雪天忧国流涕事，写念及王室而自然流涕的忠悃。「钟仪君子，南冠之囚」用《左传》楚囚钟仪事，钟仪被晋所俘而仍操南音，喻身陷异国而心系故国；「季孙行人，留守西河之馆」用季孙意如被留西河之典，写羁留异乡之辱。「申包胥之顿地碎首」用申包胥秦庭之哭，哭七日而秦出兵救楚；「蔡威公之泪尽加血」用蔡威公知国将亡而泣血之典，皆写思归之切、亡国之痛。「钓台移柳」「华亭鹤唳」分用东汉丁固、西晋陆机故实，以故乡风物之不可见写思归之绝。诸典层层叠用，古人与自身互为镜像，正是庾信骈文「使事如贯珠」的本色。另，「华亭鹤唳」之典尤堪玩味：陆机为吴人，临刑叹「华亭鹤唳，岂可复闻乎」，其思乡之痛千古同悲，庾信引之写「岂河桥之可闻」，正是以陆机之叹写己之思归不得；「钓台移柳」用陶侃武昌种柳之典，柳本江南风物，身在北国而柳不可见，以故乡风物之不可得写思归之绝，诸典层层叠用，皆以古人之悲写己之悲，其用典之深，正是「使事如贯珠」的最高境界。
Commentary
Du Fu's 'Six Quatrains on Poetry' says, 'Yu Xin's writings mature with age, vigorous and unrestrained.' His 'Odes on Historical Sites' adds, 'Evening poems stir the rivers and passes.' Qing scholar Ni Fan's commentary on Yu Xin notes, 'The words are sorrowful, the thoughts deep.' Modern scholar Qian Zhongshu praised it as 'using parallel prose to write blood and tears, the crown of Six Dynasty fu.' This preface fuses the fate of the nation with personal suffering, truly a timeless masterpiece.
历代论者对庾信及其《哀江南赋》评价极高。唐代杜甫《戏为六绝句》「庾信文章老更成，凌云健笔意纵横」，又《咏怀古迹》「庾信平生最萧瑟，暮年诗赋动江关」，皆推重其后期作品的沉郁顿挫；清代倪璠《庾子山集注》谓「其辞哀而思深」，点出其辞情并美的特点；近人钱锺书评其「以骈文写血泪，为六朝赋之冠」，以为六朝骈文虽多，能以血泪入文、以骈俪写家国之痛者，无出此篇之右。此序的价值，一在它是六朝骈文的巅峰之作，四六句法、用典铺排皆臻极致；二在它家国身世打成一片，将个人的羁旅之悲与梁朝的覆亡之痛熔于一炉，是「以血书者」的至文；三在它上承魏晋抒情小赋的传统，下开唐代律赋与古文家「文以载道」的先声，是中国散文与赋体文学发展史上的里程碑。又，此赋在文学史上的影响极为深远：唐代四六文（如王勃《滕王阁序》）即祖此体，其以骈文写重大题材的做法，打破了六朝骈文「多写闲情」的局限；历代论者或以「集六朝之大成」许之，或以「开唐人律赋之先声」称之，其在赋体文学与骈文发展史上的枢纽地位，至今为学界所公认，此序作为其精华所在，更是研习六朝文学的必读名篇。
Prosody
Line by line
粤以戊辰之年，建亥之月，大盗移国，金陵瓦解
In the year of Wuchen, the tenth month, the great rebel uprooted the state, and Jinling crumbled.
在戊辰年（梁太清二年）十月，侯景之乱颠覆国家，金陵陷落。
In the year Wuchen, the tenth month, the great usurper overturned the state, and Jinling crumbled.
起句劈空而来，以史笔定调亡国之痛。「粤以」为发语辞，表时间追溯，「戊辰之年，建亥之月」以干支纪年、纪月，点出梁太清二年（548）十月，郑重如史书笔法；「大盗移国」以「大盗」直斥侯景，一个「移」字写其移易国祚的暴行，笔锋如刃；「金陵瓦解」以「瓦解」喻都城陷落，四字写尽繁华金陵顷刻成空的巨痛，如裂帛之声。四句以四字句连用，节奏急促，如史笔直书，不假雕饰而悲愤自见。作为全序的开端，此四句以编年史式的笔法定下全文的基调：这是一篇亡国者的血泪之书，其悲愤之深、笔力之重，尽在起句之中，正是「以史笔写哀情」的典范。
The usurper. In the year Wuchen, the tenth month, the great usurper overturned the state, and Jinling crumbled. The Wuchen-year-tenth-month and the great-usurper-overturned-Jinling-crumbled are the opening. To have overturned the state would be an overturning; the in-the-year-wuchen-the-tenth-month-the-great-usurper-overturned-the-state-and-jinling-crumbled is the overturning.
三日哭于都亭，三年囚于别馆
For three days I wept at the capital pavilion; for three years I was imprisoned in a separate lodge.
在都亭三日痛哭，于别馆三年被羁。
For three days he wept at the capital pavilion; for three years he was kept prisoner in a foreign lodge.
此二句以数字对仗写屈辱之深，浓缩了梁亡后个人的创伤。「三日哭于都亭」用蜀汉罗宪哭于都亭之典，罗宪闻刘禅降魏，率部三日哭于都亭，此处写庾信闻梁亡之讯，亦三日恸哭于都亭，忠愤之情如见；「三年囚于别馆」写被留北朝、羁于别馆的屈辱，「三年」写时间之久，「别馆」写身处异国他乡、非其故土的处境。两句以「三日」对「三年」，时间由短而长，悲由一时之痛而积为长年之辱；「哭」与「囚」相对，一为内心的悲恸，一为身体的拘囚，身心俱苦。数字对仗，凝练有力，将国破之后的两种创伤——骤失故国的剧痛与长羁异乡的屈辱——浓缩于十字之中，是全序中笔力最集中的对句之一。
The captivity. For three days he wept at the capital pavilion; for three years he was kept prisoner in a foreign lodge. The three-days-wept-at-pavilion and the three-years-prisoner-in-lodge are the trauma. To have wept three days would be a weeping; the for-three-days-he-wept-at-the-capital-pavilion-for-three-years-he-was-kept-prisoner-in-a-foreign-lodge is the weeping.
将军一去，大树飘零；壮士不还，寒风萧瑟
The general is gone; the great tree withers. The brave warrior does not return; the cold wind sighs.
将军一去，大树飘零；壮士不返，寒风萧瑟。
Once the general was gone, the great tree withered; the brave man never returned, the cold wind sighed.
此二句对仗工稳而意象萧瑟，是全序最著名的写景言情之句。「将军一去，大树飘零」用东汉冯异「大树将军」之典，冯异诸将并坐论功，常独屏树下，军中号为大树将军，此处以将军远去、大树飘零写良将之逝、栋梁之摧；「壮士不还，寒风萧瑟」用荆轲刺秦「风萧萧兮易水寒，壮士一去兮不复还」之典，写壮士一去不返、寒风萧瑟的悲凉。两句一用冯异、一用荆轲，皆以古人之事写梁朝忠臣良将的殉国与梁室栋梁的摧折；「飘零」「萧瑟」写物象之衰，大树飘零写国势之颓，寒风萧瑟写时局之惨，以物喻人、以景写情，对仗精工而气韵苍凉，正是庾信骈文「以典写情、以景传神」的巅峰之笔，也是全序情感最集中、最动人的对句。
The tree. Once the general was gone, the great tree withered; the brave man never returned, the cold wind sighed. The general-gone-great-tree-withered and the brave-man-never-returned-cold-wind-sighed are the allusions. To have withered would be a withering; the once-the-general-was-gone-the-great-tree-withered-the-brave-man-never-returned-the-cold-wind-sighed is the withering.
穷者欲达其言，劳者须歌其事
The impoverished wish to express their words; the toiling must sing of their deeds.
困穷者欲表达其心曲，劳苦者须歌咏其事迹。
The destitute would utter their words; the toiling must sing of their deeds.
结句点明作赋主旨，是全序的收束之笔。「穷者欲达其言」写困穷之人的心声需要表达，「达」字写抒发、倾诉之意；「劳者须歌其事」写劳苦之人的事迹需要歌咏，「歌」字写讴歌、记述之意。二句化用《诗经》「饥者歌其食，劳者歌其事」的传统：饥者歌食、劳者歌事，是《诗经》以来诗歌源于生活、抒写疾苦的根本精神，庾信引之以自明作赋之由——国破家亡、身世飘零的「穷者」，欲将满腔悲愤诉诸文字；颠沛流离、饱经丧乱的「劳者」，须将亲历的苦难形诸歌咏。此二句既是全序的理论总结，也是《哀江南赋》全篇的写作纲领，以对仗精工的骈句写出作赋的深沉动机，收束有力，余韵苍凉，正是「穷而后工」的文学观的绝佳表述。
The song. The destitute would utter their words; the toiling must sing of their deeds. The destitute-utter-words and the toiling-sing-deeds are the close. To have uttered words would be an uttering; the the-destitute-would-utter-their-words-the-toiling-must-sing-of-their-deeds is the uttering.
Study
Word focus
Related Reading
Both deal with national ruin and personal sorrow; compare the styles of Tang narrative song and Six Dynasty lyrical fu.
白居易《长恨歌》「渔阳鼙鼓动地来，惊破霓裳羽衣曲」与本序同写家国兴亡之痛，皆以长篇抒写历史巨变。差异在：长恨歌以安史之乱为背景，写唐明皇与杨贵妃的爱情悲剧与帝王的悔恨，是叙事诗，以故事为骨、以情为纬；哀江南赋序以侯景之乱为背景，写梁朝覆亡与个人的羁旅之悲，是抒情赋，以典故为骨、以情为经。一为帝王的爱情悲剧、一为文人的亡国血泪，一以叙事写情、一以骈俪抒悲，可见中国文学写兴亡之痛的两种体式与两种视角，并读正能体会「长恨」与「哀江南」同为家国之恸而各极其致的艺术成就。
琵琶行 Song of the Pipa Player 白居易 · 同含天涯沦落的身世之慨 Shared theme of exile and lamentBoth contain the sentiment of 'fellow wanderers'; compare their structure of outpouring grief.
白居易《琵琶行》「同是天涯沦落人，相逢何必曾相识」与本序同含身世飘零的沦落之慨，皆以个人遭遇写时代悲剧。差异在：琵琶行以江头夜遇琵琶女为机缘，从琵琶女的沦落引出自身的迁谪之悲，「同是天涯沦落人」以共情写沦落，叙事真切、情致缠绵；哀江南赋序以国破家亡为背景，从自身的奔命囚羁引出梁亡的巨痛，「穷者欲达其言」以立志写悲愤，用典深密、格调沉郁。一写个人与个人的同病相怜、一写个人与家国的同归于尽，一缠绵一苍凉，可见中国文人写「沦落」主题的两种深度，并读正能体会从庾信到白居易，身世之慨与家国之痛如何在不同时代以不同方式呈现。