近现代 近现代 · 诗 Poem
十四行集·二十七
Sonnets, No. 27
从一片泛滥无形的水里,取水人取来椭圆的一瓶,这点水就得到一个定形;
看,在秋风里飘扬的风旗,它把住些把不住的事体。
this little water gains a fixed shape.
Look — a wind-flag flying in the autumn wind;
it holds fast some things that cannot be held.
Meaning
From a flood of shapeless water the water-carrier brings an oval bottle, and the water takes a shape; a flag flies in the autumn wind, and it holds fast some things that cannot be held. The poem asks how formless matter gains form and how what cannot be grasped can be grasped — in other words, how art, or the poem itself, gives shape to a chaotic life.
从一片泛滥无形的水里,取水人取来椭圆的一瓶,这点水就得到一个定形;看,在秋风里飘扬的风旗,它把住些把不住的事体。
Appreciation
[Plain Paraphrase] Two everyday scenes, side by side: water drawn into a bottle, wind caught by a flag. [Structure] The two halves are exactly parallel — water and bottle, wind and flag — and the parallel structure is a sonnet's logic of weighing one thing against another. [Imagery] The abstract is made concrete: chaotic life is water, form is the bottle, existence is the wind, poetry is the flag, and the poem never says any of this in so many words. [Technique] Nothing is argued; the poet simply places two objects and lets the reasoning happen in the reader. The theme is Rilke's question of how to hold existence, and it is also a meditation on poetry itself — how a poem takes hold of what will not be held.
【白话串讲】 冯至写《十四行集·二十七》:“从一片泛滥无形的水里,取水人取来椭圆的一瓶,这点水就得到一个定形”——“看,在秋风里飘扬的风旗,它把住些把不住的事体”——他写无形之物如何得到定形。 【意象与手法】 此诗是冯至《十四行集》第二十七首,写「无形与定形」的哲理:泛滥无形的水,因取水人的一瓶而得定形;无形无状的风,因飘扬的风旗而被把住。两个意象(水瓶与水、风旗与风)对举,一写「取」一写「把」,以具象写抽象,把「艺术(形式)如何把握混沌的生存」这一命题写得可触可感。 【情感与主旨】 借取水与扬旗两个日常场景,思索形式与质料、把握与流动的关系:泛滥无形者唯有借一定的形式方能定形,正如混沌的生命唯有借诗的形式方能被把握——这既是里尔克式的存在之思,也是冯至对诗歌本身的沉思,即「诗如何把住把不住的事体」。 【名句点睛】 「看,在秋风里飘扬的风旗,它把住些把不住的事体」以风旗把风喻诗把握生命,意象精妙、哲理深永,是《十四行集》中传诵最广的句子之一。
Background
The twenty-seven sonnets of 'Sonnets' were written by Feng Zhi (1905–1993) while teaching at the South-West Associated University in Kunming in 1941 and are the summit of his poetry. Feng, from Zhuozhou, Hebei, became known in the 1920s for 'Songs of Yesterday' and 'Northward and Elsewhere', and Lu Xun called him 'the most outstanding lyric poet of China'. He went to Germany in 1930 to study literature and philosophy and fell under the influence of existentialism and Rilke; Rilke held that poetry is not written but waited for, that the poet should bear existence like a thing and hold the unholdable by means of form. In the wartime flight to Kunming he thought again about the relation between the individual, the cosmos and form, and wrote this set of 'poems of reflection'. The twenty-seven poems do not strictly observe European prosody; they take the form of the sonnet and the freedom of the spirit.
《十四行集》是冯至1941年在昆明西南联大任教期间创作的二十七首十四行诗的结果,是冯至诗歌创作的巅峰,也是中国现代新诗史上最成功的「十四行诗」实验。《十四行集·二十七》是集中的压卷之作。冯至(1905—1993),字君培,河北涿州人,中国现代著名诗人、学者、翻译家,1920年代以《昨日之歌》《北游及其他》登上诗坛,被称为「中国最杰出的抒情诗人」(鲁迅语)。1930年,冯至赴德国留学,专攻文学与哲学,深受存在主义哲学与里尔克诗学的影响——里尔克主张诗不是「写」出来的,而是「等」出来的,诗人应如物一般谦卑地承受存在,以「形式」把握「不可把握者」;冯至自述在昆明时重读里尔克,其诗风由早期的感伤抒情转向哲思凝练。抗战时期,冯至随西南联大迁居昆明,在艰苦的流亡生活中,他思考个体与宇宙、生命与形式的关系,遂以十四行体写下一组「沉思的诗」。《十四行集》的二十七首诗并非严守欧洲十四行格律,而是「取十四行之形式,行自由之精神」,此第二十七首以取水与扬旗两个意象,写「无形者借形式而定形」的哲理,正是里尔克式「物诗」与中国哲思融合的结晶。
Art
Three layers. First, the symmetry of images: the poem sets two scenes in complete parallel — water and bottle, wind and flag — a taking and a holding, still and moving, so the two halves balance like the two pans of a scale, which is the shape of a thinking poem. Second, writing the argument through things: not one word of doctrine, and yet the argument is entirely present — flood-like formless water is chaotic life, the oval bottle is form, 'fixed shape' is being held; the autumn wind is flowing existence, the flag is what holds it, and 'things that cannot be held' is what will not stay still. The poet describes nothing and lets the objects speak, which is precisely Rilke's method of the 'thing-poem'. Third, awareness of form: the poem uses the sonnet to argue about form, and the poem itself is the bottle and the flag — 'this little water gains a fixed shape' is self-reference. The language is spare — flood, formless, oval, shape, flying, holds — with not one superfluous word, and the rhythm is unhurried, which suits a poem of thought.
此诗的艺术,可括为「意象的对称、以物写理、形式的自觉」三层。其一,意象的对称:全诗两个场景,结构完全对称——「从一片泛滥无形的水里,取水人取来椭圆的一瓶,这点水就得到一个定形」写水与瓶,「看,在秋风里飘扬的风旗,它把住些把不住的事体」写风与旗。水是无形之物,瓶是定形之器;风是无形之物,旗是把住之具——两个意象一取一把、一静一动,构成严谨的平行结构,如十四行诗的上下阕,正合「一分为二、合而为一」的思辨结构。其二,以物写理:全诗无一字说理,而哲理自在物象之中——「泛滥无形的水」是混沌的生命,「椭圆的一瓶」是形式,「定形」是把握;「秋风里飘扬的风旗」是把住风的器具,「把不住的事体」是流动难捉的存在。诗人不议论而取象,以最日常的取水、扬旗写最抽象的形质之辨,正是里尔克「物诗」的方法:让物自己说话,诗人退隐于物后。其三,形式的自觉:此诗以十四行体写「形式把握质料」的命题,诗的形式本身即是内容——泛滥无形的生命经验,借十四行的形式而得定形,诗即那「取水人的瓶」「秋风里的旗」;「这点水就得到一个定形」之「定形」,正是十四行体的自我指涉:写诗如取水,泛滥者因瓶而定形。其四,语言的节制:全诗用词极俭(泛滥、无形、椭圆、定形、飘扬、把住),无一赘字,句式长短错落而节奏从容,正合沉思的语调。
Allusions
The first layer is Rilke: his sonnets to Orpheus ask how existence is to be grasped, and the ideas of 'held by an invisible hand' and 'singing is existence' direct Feng Zhi here — the water-carrier is the poet, the flood is chaotic existence, the oval bottle is the form of the poem. The second layer is existentialism: Feng studied under Jaspers and Heidegger in Germany, and 'the unholdable' is 'existence revealing itself through form', which Heidegger phrased as 'language is the home of being'. The third layer is Chinese thought: the flood of formless water recalls the vastness of 'rolling on without end' in 'Zhuangzi: The Water Bell' and Laozi's 'the best good is like water'; the flag holding the wind recalls the Chinese method of 'giving shape to what has no shape' and 'writing the void through the solid', as Wang Fuzhi described the psychology of landscape. The fourth layer is the sonnet's own tradition: born in Italy, honed by Shakespeare and Rilke, it is by nature 'a strict form for a free soul', and Feng takes its form precisely to answer the question of fixing a shape.
此诗的文化意蕴,是中西哲思在「形与质」「把握与流动」命题上的交汇。其一是里尔克的影响:里尔克《致奥尔弗斯的十四行诗》探索「如何以诗把握存在」,其名句「被无形之手把握」与「歌唱即存在」的思想,直接启发了冯至;此诗「从一片泛滥无形的水里,取水人取来椭圆的一瓶」正是里尔克式「物诗」的中国变奏——取水人如诗人,泛滥的水如混沌的存在,椭圆的一瓶如诗的形式。其二是存在主义哲学的背景:冯至留德期间受雅斯贝尔斯、海德格尔影响,思考「存在」的把握问题——海德格尔以「语言是存在的家园」言说存在借语言显现,冯至此诗「它把住些把不住的事体」,正是「存在借形式显现」的诗化表达:存在本是「把不住」的,唯借诗(形式)方能「把住」。其三是中国哲学的呼应:「泛滥无形」之水,令人想到《庄子·秋水》「泛泛乎其若四方之无穷」的浩荡无涯与老子「上善若水」的至柔无形——水在中国哲学中是「无定形」的象征,而冯至以「一瓶定形」写无形者得形,暗合中国美学「赋形」的观念(《文心雕龙》「情动而辞发」);「风旗把风」则令人想到《诗经》「风」的意象传统——风本无形,因旗而见,正是中国诗学「因物赋形」「以实写虚」的手法(王夫之「以写景之心理言情」)。其四是十四行体的诗学传统:十四行诗源于意大利、盛于莎士比亚与里尔克,本是「以严格形式写自由灵魂」的体裁,冯至取十四行之形,正是以「形式」回应「定形」的命题——诗体本身即寓言。
Commentary
'Sonnets, No. 27' is first a milestone in the self-awareness of the modern Chinese poem. Since Hu Shi's 'Attempts' the free verse had dominated and the question of form had hung unresolved; Feng used the sonnet to write modern poetry that was neither archaic (he does not keep European strictness) nor loose (he keeps the structural spirit), and the result gives the 'rhythmised' modern poem a successful model — Li Guangtian called this set 'poems of reflection' and Zhu Ziqing praised the formal exploration. In thought, the proposition that formless things take shape is the first successful expression of existential poetics in China: in a chaotic era 'flooding and formless' is both the face of water and the experience of life in a ruined land, and Feng shows that a person may settle his life through the poem — a meeting of Rilkean reflection and the Chinese tradition of 'settling the body and the mind'. Its influence reached Bian Zhilin and Mu Dan and onwards, and the image of the flag holding the wind has become a classic of modern philosophical verse.
《十四行集·二十七》在中国新诗史上的地位,首在它是「新诗形式自觉」的里程碑。自胡适《尝试集》以来,新诗以自由体为主流,形式问题始终悬而未决;冯至以十四行体写现代诗,既非复古(不守欧洲十四行的严整格律),亦非放任(保有十四行的结构精神),而是「取十四行之形式,行自由之精神」——此诗以两段对称的意象、十四行的容量,把哲理诗的凝练与自由诗的从容熔于一炉,为新诗的「格律化」提供了成功范本,李广田《沉思的诗》一文即以《十四行集》为「沉思的诗」的代表,朱自清亦盛赞其形式探索。就思想价值言,此诗提出的「无形者借形式而定形」命题,是存在主义诗学在中国的第一次成功表达:抗战流亡的乱世中,「泛滥无形」既是水的形态,也是动荡时代生命经验的写照,冯至以「取水」「把风」两个意象,写出个体在乱世中借诗(形式)安顿生命、把住存在的可能——这是里尔克式沉思与中国「安身立命」传统的遇合,也是中国现代诗由抒情走向哲思的转折点。就影响言,《十四行集》影响了此后卞之琳、穆旦等一代诗人的形式探索与哲思倾向,「风旗把风」的意象更成为新诗哲理的经典范例,此诗至今仍是中国大学文学教育与诗歌选本中「现代哲理诗」的首选篇目之一。
Prosody
Line by line
从一片泛滥无形的水里,取水人取来椭圆的一瓶,这点水就得到一个定形;
Out of a flood of formless water the water-carrier brings an oval bottle; this little water gains a fixed shape;
从一片泛滥无形的水里,取水人舀来椭圆的一瓶水,这点水就得到了一个定形。上句写取水定形,以水与瓶喻无形者借形式而得形。
From a boundless, shapeless flood the drawer of water takes an oval bottle; this drop of water takes a fixed form;
「上句是意象的第一重:以取水定形写『无形者借形式而得形』的哲理,三个短语层层递进。『从一片泛滥无形的水里』写质料的原初状态:水本是『泛滥』的——浩荡无涯、漫溢难收,『无形』的——没有固定的形态,两个定语写出水的混沌本质,也暗喻生命经验的漫无边际、难以把握;『泛滥』一词尤有深意,它既是水的形态,也是乱世中生命经验的写照——抗战流亡中,个体经验如泛滥之水,纷乱而无形。『取水人取来椭圆的一瓶』写形式的介入:取水人(诗人、艺术家)取来一只椭圆形的瓶子,从水中舀起一瓶——『椭圆』二字是精心的选择,它写出瓶子的具体形态,以具象之形对抽象之水,正见『定形』之必需;取水人与水的关系,正是艺术家与生命经验的关系:面对泛滥无形者,唯有以一定的器皿(形式)去舀取。『这点水就得到一个定形』写把握的完成:水本无形,入瓶而有了形态,『定形』二字是全句的枢纽——形是『定』的,定者,确定、安定也,泛滥者因形式而安顿。三句连读,如取水动作的三个镜头:舀取、承装、成形,以最日常的动作写出艺术把握生命的全过程,正是里尔克『物诗』的方法——让物自己说出哲理。」
The bottle. From a boundless, shapeless flood the drawer of water takes an oval bottle; this drop of water takes a fixed form. The shapeless flood and the oval bottle giving fixed form are the first image. To have given fixed form would be a forming; the from-a-boundless-shapeless-flood-the-drawer-of-water-takes-an-oval-bottle-this-drop-of-water-takes-a-fixed-form is the forming.
看,在秋风里飘扬的风旗,它把住些把不住的事体。
Look — a wind-flag flying in the autumn wind; it holds fast some things that cannot be held.
看,在秋风里飘扬的风旗,它把住了些原本把不住的事物。下句写风旗把风,以旗与风喻形式把握流动的存在。
See, the wind-flag streaming in the autumn wind, it holds what cannot be held.
「下句是意象的第二重:以风旗把风写『形式把握存在』的哲理,一个『看』字领起,如指点读者注目。『看,在秋风里飘扬的风旗』——风旗本是寻常物,旗在秋风里『飘扬』,写出旗的动态与风的存在;风本无形,旗因风而扬,旗的飘扬正是风的形态——此句的关键在『飘扬』二字:旗之动即风之形,无形之风借有形之旗而显现,正如泛滥之水借一瓶而定形。『它把住些把不住的事体』是全诗的题眼,也是最精警的一句:风是『把不住的事体』——无形无状、来去无迹,是存在中最难把握者;而风旗『把住』了它——旗以飘扬的姿态承接风、显现风,把无形的风变成了可看的形态。『把住』二字尤妙:它不是抓住、固定,而是承接、显现——风依然流动,但旗让它的流动有了形态;这正是一切艺术与存在的根本关系:诗不能固定生命(生命如风,永在流动),但诗能让生命的流动显现为形态,正如旗不能留住风,却能把住风的形象。两句与上句构成严谨的对称:水对风(无形之物)、瓶对旗(定形之具)、定形对把住(把握之功),一静一动、一取一把,把『艺术如何把住把不住的存在』这一命题写到极致——而这,也正是十四行诗本身的隐喻:泛滥的生命,借十四行的形式而得定形。」
The flag. See, the wind-flag streaming in the autumn wind, it holds what cannot be held. The wind-flag in the autumn wind holding what cannot be held is the second image. To have held the unholdable would be a holding; the see-the-wind-flag-streaming-in-the-autumn-wind-it-holds-what-cannot-be-held is the holding.
Study
Word focus
Related Reading
'The Snake' (from the 1920s) — 'my loneliness is a long snake, cold and without speech' — makes the snake the image of loneliness, strange and lingering in feeling; 'Sonnets, No. 27' (1941) makes the water and the flag images of a philosophical problem, plain and severe in thought. They mark the two phases of Feng Zhi: the lyric poet called 'the most outstanding' by Lu Xun belongs to the first, and the reflective poet of the South-West Associated University belongs to the second. What they share is the method — the concrete thing (snake, bottle, flag) carrying an invisible reality — which is Feng's lifelong way of writing the inner life through outer objects, before and after his reception of Rilke.
《蛇》与《十四行集·二十七》同出冯至之手,恰好展示其诗风的两期:《蛇》作于1920年代(「我的寂寞是一条长蛇,冰冷地没有言语」),以蛇喻寂寞,意象新奇而情感缠绵,是冯至早期「抒情诗人」的本色——鲁迅所称「中国最杰出的抒情诗人」,正指此期;《十四行集·二十七》作于1941年(「从一片泛滥无形的水里,取水人取来椭圆的一瓶」),以取水、把风写形质之辨,意象朴素而思辨深沉,是冯至后期「沉思诗人」的结晶。二诗对照,可见冯至由抒情到哲思的转型轨迹:蛇之寂寞是个人情感的物化,取水定形是存在之思的寓言;一者向内写情,一者向上写理。而共通之处在于:都以具象的物(蛇/水瓶风旗)写抽象的体验(寂寞/把握),这正是冯至一贯的『以物写心』方法,也是他接受里尔克『物诗』影响前后一以贯之的诗学追求。
断章·卞之琳 Fragments 卞之琳 · 同为现代哲理短诗,同写「把握」的辩证 Both modern philosophical short poems, both dialectical about 'grasping''Fragments' — 'you stand on the bridge looking at the scene, and the one looking at the scene is on the tower; the moon decorates your window, and you decorate another person's dream' — writes the interdependence of all things through the mutual decoration of looking. Here what is grasped is the relationship between things, and there the bottle and the flag show what form does to matter. Both take ordinary scenes for philosophy and both build the poem on the symmetry of images (bridge and tower, window and dream / water and bottle, wind and flag), showing the 'intellectual poetry' that Bian Zhilin and Feng Zhi formed under Western modernism. The difference is the direction of the thought: 'Fragments' is a relation theory — all things are each other's — while 'Sonnets, No. 27' is a theory of form — existence appears through form.
卞之琳《断章》「你站在桥上看风景,看风景的人在楼上看你。明月装饰了你的窗子,你装饰了别人的梦」与《十四行集·二十七》同为1930—1940年代中国现代哲理诗的代表作,同写「关系与把握」的辩证:《断章》写观看的互涉——你看风景,你亦是风景,明月装窗,你亦入梦,一切皆在互为「装饰」的关系网中;《十四行集·二十七》写形式的把握——泛滥的水借瓶而定形,无形的风借旗而被把住,存在借形式而显现。二诗皆以日常场景写深刻哲理,皆以意象的对称(桥—楼、窗—梦/水—瓶、风—旗)结构全诗,正见卞之琳、冯至同受西方现代主义(象征派、里尔克)影响而形成的中国现代「知性诗」传统。差异在哲理的指向:《断章》是关系论(万物互为主体),《十四行集·二十七》是形式论(存在借形式显现);一者圆融空灵,一者沉静深邃,合观可见中国现代哲理诗的两条路径。
雨巷·戴望舒 Rainy Lane 戴望舒 · 同为现代诗名篇,一者意象绵邈一者思辨凝练 Both modern classics: one lingering in feeling, one concentrated in thoughtDai Wangshu's 'Rainy Lane' — 'an oil-paper umbrella, alone, wandering a long, long and lonely rainy lane, I hope to meet a girl like an almond blossom, carrying her sad complaint' — and this sonnet are both landmarks of modern Chinese poetry from the 1920s to the 1940s, in completely different registers: one is symbolist lyric, with hazy images and a low recursing music, and writes of hope and disappointment; the other is existential reflection, with plain images and a measured, symmetrical structure, and writes of form and existence. One wins on emotional resonance, the other on intellectual depth; one follows French symbolism, the other the German tradition. Together they show the two main currents of modern Chinese poetry in those decades and together they remain models of concise, imagistic modern verse.
戴望舒《雨巷》「撑着油纸伞,独自彷徨在悠长、悠长又寂寥的雨巷」与《十四行集·二十七》同为1920—1940年代中国现代诗的名篇,而格调迥异:《雨巷》是象征主义的抒情——悠长的雨巷、丁香般的姑娘,意象朦胧绵邈,音节低回往复,写的是「希望与失望」的绵绵情愫;《十四行集·二十七》是存在主义的哲思——泛滥的水、飘扬的风旗,意象朴素凝练,句式对称节制,写的是「无形与定形」的思辨命题。一者以情韵胜(雨巷的复沓如泣如诉),一者以理趣胜(取水把风如思如辩);一者承法国象征派(魏尔伦的音节音乐),一者承德语传统(里尔克、存在主义)。合观二诗,可见中国现代诗在1930—1940年代的两大流向:戴望舒把象征主义推向音韵的极致,冯至把存在主义引入思辨的深度——而二诗同为现代诗「意象化、凝练化」的典范,共同奠定了中国现代诗在世界诗坛上的独特声调。