All poems

近现代近现代 · 文 Prose

匆匆

In Haste (Congcong)

朱自清

Zhu Ziqing

散文Prose 时间Time 抒情Lyric 名篇Masterpiece

燕子去了，有再来的时候；
杨柳枯了，有再青的时候；
桃花谢了，有再开的时候。
但是，聪明的，你告诉我，我们的日子为什么一去不复返呢？

Listen

Meaning

The opening of Zhu Ziqing's famous essay 'In Haste,' written in March 1922, at the ebb of the May Fourth, the poet twenty-four, teaching at the First Normal School of Zhejiang. The whole essay takes 'the going and never returning of the time' as the warp and 'the cycle of the return of the nature' as the woof. The opening, 'the swallows go, and there is a time when they come again; the willows wither, and there is a time when they are green again; the peach blossoms fade, and there is a time when they bloom again,' the three groups of the parallel, each sentence repeating like the song and the ballad, spreads the cycle of the nature to the full—the swallows return, the willows green, the blossoms bloom, all in the cycle; then 'but, clever one, tell me, why do our days go and never return?' turns abruptly, the cycle of the nature against the one-way of the human time, the eternal contrast of the nature and the life, and the 'our days go and never return' the question of the whole essay, the lament of the time of the whole essay.

燕子去了，有再来的时候；杨柳枯了，有再青的时候；桃花谢了，有再开的时候。但是，聪明的，你告诉我，我们的日子为什么一去不复返呢？

Appreciation

The artistic charm of 'In Haste' lies in the writing, with the extremely short length and the extremely plain language, of the most universal and the most personal feeling of the philosophy of the time, a model of the 'the less wins the more' of the vernacular belle-lettres. The whole takes 'the going and never returning of the time' as the warp and 'the cycle of the return of the nature' as the woof, forming the contrast-structure that runs through the whole: the opening, 'the swallows go, and there is a time when they come again; the willows wither, and there is a time when they are green again; the peach blossoms fade, and there is a time when they bloom again,' the three groups of the parallel, each sentence repeating like the song and the ballad, the cycle of the nature spread to the full—the swallows return, the willows green, the blossoms bloom, everything in the cycle; then the 'but' turns, the 'clever one, tell me, why do our days go and never return?' the abrupt question, the cycle of the nature against the one-way of the human time, the eternal contrast of the nature and the life. The 'clever one' of the address is most touching: the affectionate address of the childlike innocence to the 'clever one,' against the unanswerable question, the pathos of the time in the innocence.

【白话串讲】朱自清写《匆匆》：“燕子去了，有再来的时候；杨柳枯了，有再青的时候；桃花谢了，有再开的时候。但是，聪明的，你告诉我，我们的日子为什么一去不复返呢”——“像针尖上一滴水滴在大海里，我的日子滴在时间的流里”——他写时光匆匆。【意象与手法】本文是散文诗式的抒情美文，以「起兴—对照—设问」三层递进：三组排比起兴，铺开自然往复的背景；「但是」一转，以「一去不复返」点破人的时间与自然时间的天壤之别；末以「聪明的，你告诉我」的拟人设问收束，把哲思化为一声温柔的追问。语言口语化而诗意浓，长短句错落，节奏如叹息。【情感与主旨】文章借日子的一去不复返，抒发对时光流逝的敏感与怅惘，以及「我赤裸裸来到这世界，转眼间也将赤裸裸的回去」的生命自觉，其底里是对生命意义的追问——时间在流走，我们拿什么来证明自己活过？这怅惘中深含着不甘虚度的进取心。【名句点睛】「燕子去了，有再来的时候；杨柳枯了，有再青的时候；桃花谢了，有再开的时候」以三复沓起兴，流畅如歌，成为描写时光最著名的排比；「我们的日子为什么一去不复返呢」一问，把抽象的哲学命题化为可感的惆怅，余韵无穷。

Background

Zhu Ziqing (1898–1948), courtesy name Peixian, a native of Yangzhou, Jiangsu, a master of the modern Chinese prose, one of the founders of the vernacular belle-lettres in the new literature movement, with Zhou Zuoren and Bing Xin one of the representative prose writers of the May Fourth. His prose is famous for the true feeling and the refined language, and 'The Back View,' 'The Moonlight over the Lotus Pond,' and 'In Haste' are all classics of the modern prose. 'In Haste' was written in March 1922, at the ebb of the May Fourth: the passion of the new culture movement gradually faded, and the intellectual world was filled with the wandering and the bitterness; Zhu Ziqing was twenty-four, teaching at the First Normal School of Zhejiang, at the very juncture of the May Fourth generation's passing from the fervor to the meditation. Earlier, in 1920, he had published the long poem 'Destruction,' already showing his bitter pursuit of the meaning of the life; 'In Haste' is the prose presentation of this mood—in the clamor of the age, the young man's feeling of the flying of the days and the emptiness of the life.

朱自清（1898—1948），字佩弦，江苏扬州人，中国现代散文大家，新文学运动中白话美文的奠基者之一，与周作人、冰心等同为「五四」散文的代表作家。其散文以情真意切、语言洗练著称，《背影》《荷塘月色》《匆匆》皆为现代散文的经典。《匆匆》写于1922年3月，时值「五四」落潮期：新文化运动的激情逐渐消退，知识界弥漫着彷徨与苦闷，朱自清时年二十四岁，任教于浙江省立第一师范，正是「五四」一代青年从亢奋走向沉思的关口。此前1920年他曾发表长诗《毁灭》，已见其对人生意义的苦苦追索；《匆匆》正是这种心境的散文呈现——在时代的喧哗与沉寂之间，一个敏感的青年忽然惊觉日子正从指缝间流走，生命的意义尚未安放，而时间已不容等待。文章发表后收入1924年出版的散文集《踪迹》，其后长期入选中学语文教材，成为中国人理解「时间」的最初文学启蒙。这一时期的朱自清，正从五四的激情转向沉潜的自省：理想退潮后，他一面在《桨声灯影里的秦淮河》里看人间的浮华，一面在《匆匆》里直面时间的空茫，《匆匆》即其直面光阴、追问生命意义的第一声叹息。

Art

The art lies in the 'the less wins the more': the three groups of the parallel of the cycle of the nature, the 'but' turning, the question of the 'why do our days go and never return,' the contrast of the nature and the life, the eternal question of the time; the 'clever one' of the address, the affection of the childlike innocence against the unanswerable question, the pathos of the time in the innocence; and the plain and the true language of the vernacular, the most universal and the most personal feeling of the philosophy of the time.

《匆匆》的艺术魅力，在于以极短的篇幅、极素的语言，写出了时间哲学中最普遍也最切身的感受，堪称白话美文「以少胜多」的典范。全文（含后续段落）以「时间的一去不返」为经，以「自然界的往复循环」为纬，形成贯穿始终的对照结构：开篇「燕子去了，有再来的时候；杨柳枯了，有再青的时候；桃花谢了，有再开的时候」三组排比，句句复沓、如歌如谣，把自然界的循环规律铺得满满当当——燕归、柳青、花开，一切都在轮回；随即「但是」一转，如琴弦骤断：「我们的日子为什么一去不复返呢？」以自然之「复」反衬时间之「不复」，反差愈大，怅惘愈深。章法上，这是典型的「起兴—设问」结构：起兴以物候之美铺垫，设问以拟人之语点题，前者实写、后者虚问，一实一虚、一喜一怅；语言上，全用口语化的白话（「但是」「聪明的」「你告诉我」），却因排比、对偶与设问的修辞而诗意盎然。最见功力的是人称的转换：「燕子」「杨柳」「桃花」是无人称的客观世界，「你」则突然把时间拟为人格化的对话对象——这一问，问得亲切，也问得惊心，使抽象的哲学命题获得了可触可感的温度，这正是朱自清散文「于平淡处见深致」的风格。

Allusions

The cultural import of 'In Haste' inherits the long-standing tradition of the 'cherishing the time' of the Chinese literature and opens the philosophical consciousness of the moderns of the time. The choice of the images of the 'swallows,' 'willows,' and 'peach blossoms' is by no means accidental: the swallow is the messenger of the spring, the willow the eye of the spring, and the peach blossom the color of the spring, the three the classic images of the 'the spring returning to the earth' of the Chinese literature—Du Fu's 'the mud melting, the swallows fly,' He Zhizhang's 'the ten thousand branches hanging down the green silk braid,' and the 'the peach blossom, luxuriant' of the Book of Songs, all writing the return of the spring with them; and the 'our days go and never return' the tradition of the cherishing of the time, from Confucius's 'the river flows on like this, not stopping day or night' to the 'the great river flows east, the time not waiting for me' of the ancient poems, the same vein.

《匆匆》的文化意蕴，上承中国文学源远流长的「惜时」传统，下启现代人对时间的哲学自觉。「燕子」「杨柳」「桃花」的意象选择绝非偶然：燕子是春的使者，杨柳是春的眉眼，桃花是春的颜色，三者都是中国文学中象征「春回大地」的经典物象——杜甫「泥融飞燕子」、贺知章「万条垂下绿丝绦」、《诗经》「桃之夭夭」，皆以之写春天；而春天在传统文化中又总是与「再来」「复生」相连。朱自清以这三组物象起兴，正是借传统文化的「循环时间观」作背景，反衬现代人惊醒的「线性时间观」——自然可以周而复始，人生却是一去不返的单程。这一对照，暗合孔子「逝者如斯夫，不舍昼夜」的川上之叹，也呼应《古诗十九首》「人生天地间，忽如远行客」的苍凉自觉；而「聪明的，你告诉我」的拟人设问，又使人想起屈原《天问》式的仰天叩问——只是屈原问的是宇宙洪荒，朱自清问的是日常光阴。至于「一去不复返」一语，更直接化用《战国策》「荆轲刺秦王」中「风萧萧兮易水寒，壮士一去兮不复还」的句式与苍茫，把惜时之叹与生命之悲融为一炉，使这篇白话散文获得了文言经典的文化纵深。

Commentary

Since its publication in 1922, 'In Haste' has been recited unceasingly for nearly a century, one of the most widely spread pieces of the modern prose. On the level of the literary history, it is a milestone of the vernacular belle-lettres: the poetic lyricism written in the pure vernacular proves that the vernacular can not only narrate and argue but also convey the most subtle feeling, and, with Lu Xun's 'Dawn Blossoms Plucked at Dusk' and Zhou Zuoren's 'The Wupeng Boat,' establishes the aesthetic standard of the modern Chinese prose. And the 'why do our days go and never return?' has become the eternal question of the Chinese for the time, its pathos the common feeling of the generations of the youth.

《匆匆》自1922年发表以来，将近一个世纪传诵不衰，是现代散文中传播最广的篇目之一。在文学史层面，它是白话美文的里程碑：以纯正的白话写出诗意的抒情，证明白话不仅能叙事说理，更能传达最精微的感怀，与鲁迅《朝花夕拾》、周作人《乌篷船》共同确立了中国现代散文的审美标高；在文化层面，「匆匆」二字已成为中国人表达时光流逝的通用语——「时光匆匆」「岁月匆匆」的日常言说皆源于此，文章塑造的「时间一去不返」的意象深入民族心理，成为惜时文化的现代经典；在传播层面，此篇长期入选各级语文教材，几代人于课堂背诵「燕子去了，有再来的时候」，其对时间意识的文化启蒙，远超出一般文学作品。从思想史看，它身处「五四」落潮期的时代语境，其怅惘是「五四」一代青年从理想主义转向现实主义的普遍心绪——同一年代，郁达夫写《沉沦》的苦闷、冰心写《繁星》的温柔，而朱自清以「日子一去不复返」写出的是最日常也最深刻的生命自觉。此文与他的《背影》《荷塘月色》并称「朱自清三大名篇」，一写亲情、一写静美、一写光阴，合观可见其散文世界的全貌，也可见中国现代散文在抒情美学上的最高成就。

Prosody

Form Modern vernacular lyric prose (prose-poetic brushwork, the belle-lettres between the prose and the poetry)现代白话抒情散文（散文诗笔法，介于散文与诗歌之间的美文）

Rhyme This piece does not rhyme; the beauty of the rhythm comes from the parallel and the repetition and the modulation of the particles: the three groups of the parallel of the opening, 'the swallows go, and there is a time when they come again,' each sentence repeating本文（含选段）不押韵脚，韵律之美来自排比复沓与语助的调配：开篇三组排比「燕子去了，有再来的时候／杨柳枯了，有再青的时候／桃花谢了，有再开的时候」句句复沓，每句以「了」收束、以「的时候」拖音，读来如谣曲回环，一唱三叹；「但是，聪明的，你告诉我」以逗号切出三个短音步，如呼吸一窒；末句「我们的日子为什么一去不复返呢」以「呢」字收尾，声音上挑又缓缓落下，把问句的余韵拖到句外，全段声情由明快转怅惘，如春歌骤变为秋叹。

Tone pattern The three groups of the parallel are even and flowing like the song, the 'but' turns abruptly, and the question 'why do our days go and never return' is eager and lingering—the whole from the cycle to the question, the lament of the time carried by the rhythm句式以口语化的长短句相间：排比句匀齐如歌，转折句短促有力，设问句舒缓绵长；语调用陈述（燕子去了）转呼告（聪明的，你告诉我）再转疑问（为什么一去不复返呢），语调由平而扬、由扬而怅，先以物候的欢快铺垫，再以设问的怅惘收束，层次分明而一气呵成。

Reading note The parallel and the repetition and the eager question carry the lament of the time, the eternal question of the going and never returning.《匆匆》作为白话美文的典范，其声律之美在于「以口语为乐谱」：通篇不用文言腔调，全凭白话的语助词、复沓句与自然停顿营造节奏。开篇三组排比是全文的声律核心——「燕子去了，有再来的时候」六字一顿，句末的「了」字如钟摆的轻叩，三个「的时候」如三声拖长的叹息，声音的回环正暗合自然的循环，读来明快如童谣；「但是」二字一出，节奏陡变，两个短促的仄声字如急刹车，把前面的循环曲调硬生生打断；「聪明的，你告诉我」以逗号切出三个音步，节奏放缓，如欲言又止；「我们的日子为什么一去不复返呢」以长句拖出，句末「呢」字轻轻上挑，把疑问的语气漾开，声音落下时怅惘已满纸。这种「先循环、后断裂、再拖问」的声情曲线，正是内容（循环与不返的对照）在声音层面的精确对应。朱自清曾自述散文「意在表现自己」，而其声律上「以俗为雅、以口为声」的追求，使这篇白话短文具备了近乎音乐的结构力，这也是它百年传诵、被无数人诵读而从不厌倦的秘密所在。

Line by line

燕子去了，有再来的时候；杨柳枯了，有再青的时候；桃花谢了，有再开的时候。

The swallows go, and there is a time when they come again; the willows wither, and there is a time when they are green again; the peach blossoms fade, and there is a time when they bloom again. (The three groups of the parallel, the cycle of the nature spread to the full: the swallows return, the willows green, the blossoms bloom, the woof of the contrast of the nature and the life.)

燕子飞走了，还有再飞回来的时候；杨柳枯萎了，还有再变青的时候；桃花凋谢了，还有再开放的时候。

The swallows are gone, but they will return; the willows are withered, but they will green again; the peach blossoms are fallen, but they will bloom again.

起句三组排比，是全文最脍炙人口的段落，以复沓之美写循环之律，为后文的怅惘铺设最充分的背景。三句句式完全一致：「燕子去了，有再来的时候」——主语（燕子）加「去了」，再加「有再来的时候」，六字一顿，如歌谣的节拍；「杨柳枯了，有再青的时候」「桃花谢了，有再开的时候」依次跟进，一鸟一木一花，由天空到岸边到枝头，意象层层铺展，把自然界「去而复来、枯而复青、谢而复开」的循环规律写得流畅明快。修辞上这是典型的「起兴」与「排比」合用：以物起兴，引出下文之人；三句连排，造成一唱三叹的音乐效果。「去—来」「枯—青」「谢—开」三组反义词的对照，字面是写自然之循环，实则暗中为下句「一去不复返」的「不循环」预埋伏笔——循环之美铺得越满，不返之痛衬得越深。值得注意的是句末三字「的时候」的重复：口语化的拖音使整段读来如念谣曲，亲切而怅惘，正是朱自清白话美文「以俗为雅」的语言魅力。

The cycles. The swallows are gone, but they will return; the willows are withered, but they will green again; the peach blossoms are fallen, but they will bloom again. The swallows, willows, and peach blossoms that return are the cycles. To have returned after going would be a cycle; the swallows-are-gone-but-they-will-return-the-willows-are-withered-but-they-will-green-again-the-peach-blossoms-are-fallen-but-they-will-bloom-again is the cycle.

但是，聪明的，你告诉我，我们的日子为什么一去不复返呢？

But, clever one, tell me, why do our days go and never return? (The abrupt turn: the cycle of the nature against the one-way of the human time, the 'clever one' of the address most touching, the eternal question of the time.)

但是，聪明的人啊，你告诉我，我们的日子为什么一去就再也不复返了呢？

But, clever one, tell me: why do our days go never to return?

此句是全文的转捩与题眼，一句设问，把前文的物候之美骤然转入生命的怅惘。「但是」二字如急转的枢纽：前文三组排比铺的是自然界的周而复始，此二字一落，笔锋陡转，由物及人、由循环及不返，顿挫之间，情绪由明快跌入沉思。「聪明的，你告诉我」的拟人设问最见匠心：称时间或命运为「聪明的」，是恳求式的口吻，亲切得近乎撒娇，而所问之事却沉重至极——「我们的日子为什么一去不复返呢？」这一问，问的是时间的一维性：自然界可以轮回，唯有人生是单程；燕子会再归来，而我们的少年、青春、此刻，却永不再来。「我们」二字把个人之问推广为人类之问，使怅惘有了普遍性；「一去不复返」五字，化用「壮士一去兮不复还」的苍茫语调，把日常光阴的流逝写得如壮士诀别般不可挽回。以最温柔的口气问最残酷的问题，正是此句百年来打动无数读者的秘密——它替每个读到它的人，问出了那句压在心头的话。

The question. But, clever one, tell me: why do our days go never to return? The clever-one question and the never-returning days are the point. To have asked why the days never returned would be a question; the but-clever-one-tell-me-why-do-our-days-go-never-to-return is the question.

Study

Word focus

一去不复返 To go and never return. The word of the time: 'our days go and never return'—the one-way of the human time against the cycle of the nature, the eternal lament of the time, the question of the whole essay in the five characters. 「我们的日子为什么一去不复返呢」之「一去不复返」，是全文的点睛之词，也是中国语言中关于「时间不可逆」最凝练的表达。「一去」写逝去之决绝——去便去了，绝无留恋；「不复返」写永无回程——三个字层层否定，把时间的一维性写得斩钉截铁。此语渊源有自：《战国策·燕策》记荆轲易水送别，「风萧萧兮易水寒，壮士一去兮不复还」，本写壮士赴死的决绝；朱自清移以写日子之流逝，把「壮士一去」的悲壮化入日常光阴，使惜时之叹陡然获得苍凉的重量——原来每一个寻常日子的逝去，都如壮士赴义般不可挽回。全句以「为什么」发问，以「一去不复返」作答于问中，其实答案已寓于词义——日子之所以不复返，正因其「一去」即「不返」，这正是时间的本性。五字一出，前文燕归柳青花开的三重循环顿成虚影，自然之复与人生之不复的对照轰然确立，全文的怅惘由此有了坚不可摧的逻辑支点。

聪明的 Clever one. The word of the address: 'but, clever one, tell me'—the affectionate address of the childlike innocence to the 'clever one,' against the unanswerable question, the pathos of the time in the innocence. 「但是，聪明的，你告诉我」之「聪明的」三字，是全句最温柔也最奇崛的表达，一个称呼便让抽象的「时间」有了可以对话的人格。「聪明的」是拟人化的呼告：诗人不直呼「时间」，而称之以「聪明的」，仿佛时间是一位洞悉一切却守口如瓶的智者——这一称呼里，既有对时间力量的敬畏，又有恳求它作答的委屈，仿佛在说：你什么都知道，你为什么不告诉我？三字之妙，还在以「聪明」反衬「无奈」：时间越是聪明，越显出提问者的天真——明知没有答案，偏要问那最聪明的；明知一去不返，偏要问它为何不返。这种「明知故问」的恳切，正是抒情散文的最高技巧：把哲学的绝望，写成孩子般的追问。若易为「时间啊」「命运啊」，则直白失味；唯「聪明的」三字，亲昵、敬畏、委屈、怅惘兼而有之，使整句如一声叹息般自然，也把全篇的情感从伤春悲秋提升为对存在本身的追问，一个称呼里，藏着朱自清全部的温柔与清醒。

匆匆