晋 晋 · 文 Prose
陈情表
Memorial on Filial Feeling (Chen Qing Biao)
臣密言:臣以险衅,夙遭闵凶。
生孩六月,慈父见背;
行年四岁,舅夺母志。
祖母刘悯臣孤弱,躬亲抚养。
臣少多疾病,九岁不行,零丁孤苦,至于成立。
Meaning
Li Mi opens by declaring his harsh fate: his father died when he was six months old, his mother was forced to remarry at his fourth year, and his grandmother Liu alone reared him through sickness and lonely childhood. The passage builds the emotional ground for his later claim that, having been raised by her, he cannot leave her to answer the throne's summons.
臣李密上言:臣因命运多舛,早年便遭逢忧患凶丧。臣出生才六个月,慈父就去世了;长到四岁,舅父又逼迫母亲改嫁,夺去了母亲守节的志向。祖母刘氏怜悯臣孤苦弱小,亲自抚养臣长大。臣年少时体弱多病,九岁还不能行走,孤苦零丁,一直到长大成人。
Appreciation
Built on 'feeling' with 'reason' as its use, the piece fuses confession and argument: first the sorrow of his birth, then the fact of grandmother and grandson leaning on each other, then the dilemma of advance or retreat, step by step. Parallel and prose interlace, four-character lines flow with grief, the tone humble and earnest — phrases like 'lone and bitter' and 'reared me herself' strike the heart.
【白话串讲】 李密写《陈情表》:“臣以险衅,夙遭闵凶。生孩六月,慈父见背”——他从小丧父。“祖母刘悯臣孤弱,躬亲抚养”——“臣无祖母,无以至今日;祖母无臣,无以终余年”——“乌鸟私情,愿乞终养”——晋武帝读了都感动,允许他回家养祖母。“读陈情表不哭者不孝”。 【意象与手法】 本文以「情」为骨、以「理」为用,将陈情与说理熔于一炉:先陈身世之悲,再言祖孙相依之实,后申进退两难之衷,层层递进。语言骈散相间,多用四字句而哀音流动,措辞谦卑恳切,尤以「零丁孤苦」「躬亲抚养」等语直击人心 【情感与主旨】 全文的核心是「孝」:祖母抚养之恩与孙儿反哺之情的对等,构成辞官不赴的伦理根基。李密以孝抗王命,实则是以人情破君权,将忠孝难以两全的千古难题,化为一纸恳切陈情的自白 【名句点睛】 「生孩六月,慈父见背」「零丁孤苦,至于成立」为陈情名句;「臣无祖母,无以至今日,祖母无臣,无以终余年」虽在节选之外,正是此段身世叙写的必然归宿,常考其以情动人的说服艺术
Background
The Memorial on Filial Feeling was written in the early Western Jin. Its author Li Mi (224-287), styled Lingbo, also named Qian, was a man of Qianwei Wuyang (today Pengshan, Sichuan). Known for filial devotion in youth, he studied under Qiao Zhou and mastered the Zuo Zhuan; in Shu-Han he served as provincial aide, secretariat gentleman, and chief clerk to the general, several times envoy to Wu, famed for eloquence. After Shu-Han fell, Jin Wudi (Sima Yan), to win over Shu scholars and steady the new dynasty, repeatedly summoned Li Mi to court - first as gentleman, then as tutor to the heir, with edicts piling up and local authorities pressing. By then his grandmother Liu was aged and bedridden; if Li Mi answered the call, none would care for her; if he firmly declined, he risked angering the new court. Caught between loyalty (serving the new dynasty) and filial care (nursing his grandmother), Li Mi wrote this memorial to Jin Wudi, laying out her nurturing grace and his wish to repay it, begging to fulfill filial duty first and loyalty after. Reportedly the emperor was moved, granting two servants and ordering local supplies for the grandmother. Only after her death and mourning did Li Mi serve, rising to prefect of Hanzhong, later dismissed for a poem that gave offense, dying at home. The memorial became the immortal masterpiece of Chinese literature moved by filial piety.
《陈情表》作于西晋初年,作者李密(224—287),字令伯,一名虔,犍为武阳(今四川彭山)人。李密早年以孝闻名乡里,师事谯周,治《春秋左氏传》,蜀汉时为州从事、尚书郎、大将军主簿,曾多次出使吴国,有辩才。蜀汉灭亡后,晋武帝司马炎为笼络蜀地士人、稳固新朝统治,屡次征召李密入朝,先拜郎中,又除太子洗马,诏书累下,郡县逼迫。此时李密的祖母刘氏年事已高,疾病缠身,卧床不起,李密若应诏赴任,祖母将无人奉养;若坚辞不就,又恐触怒新朝、招致祸端。在忠(事新朝)与孝(养祖母)的两难困境中,李密写下这篇《陈情表》上呈晋武帝,极陈祖母养育之恩与自己报养之愿,恳请准许他先尽孝、后尽忠。据说晋武帝读后深受感动,赐奴婢二人,并令郡县供其祖母膳食。祖母去世、守丧期满后,李密方出仕,官至汉中太守,后因赋诗得罪免官,卒于家。此表遂成为中国文学史上以「孝」动人的千古名篇。
Art
This is a lyric masterpiece of the memorial form, parallel-prose public writing, its scheme 'feeling as warp, reason as weft.' Three layers: open with the sorrow of birth under 'ill fortune, calamity,' telling father's death, mother's loss, grandmother's rearing, the sick lonely child — founding the feeling; turn to the present dependence of grandmother and grandson, the causal 'without grandmother no today'; close with the dilemma, begging to put filial care first. Though this excerpt is only the opening, the scheme shows: first the keenest grief to move the throne, then the plainest reason to persuade, then the humblest words to spare the ruler's grace. In language it favors four-character lines ('six months born,' 'four years of age,' 'lone and bitter,' 'reared me herself'), short and breathless, fitting grief; with antitheses like 'your servant by ill fortune' it stays tidy yet mournful. The wording is abjectly humble — 'your servant Mi declares' opens in court ritual — the art of advancing by retreat. The sparseness is praised: a decade of life in dozens of characters, yet the bone-deep pain and nurturing grace are all there.
本文是奏疏体(表)中的抒情杰作,属于骈散结合的公牍散文,章法以「陈情」为经、「说理」为纬。全文结构可分三层:开篇自述身世之悲,以「险衅」「闵凶」总起,叙父丧母去、祖母抚养、体弱孤苦的遭际,为全篇之「情」奠基;中间转入祖孙相依的现状,点明「臣无祖母,无以至今日」的因果链条,将报恩之心落到实处;结尾申述进退两难之状,恳请以孝为先。虽本篇所录仅为开篇一段,其章法精神已可见一斑:先以极痛之语动君听,再以极实之理服君心,后以极卑之辞全君恩。语言艺术上,本文多用四字句(「生孩六月」「行年四岁」「零丁孤苦」「躬亲抚养」),短句连排、声促气短,正合悲苦之情的节奏;又杂以「臣以险衅,夙遭闵凶」这样的对句,整饬而不失哀婉。措辞上极尽谦卑:「臣密言」三字以臣礼开头,「伏惟」「猥以微贱」「当侍东宫」等语自抑至极,是「以退为进」的进言艺术。叙事之简练尤为人称道——十余年身世,仅以数十字写完,而骨肉之痛、养育之恩俱在其中。
Allusions
The piece's allusions root in China's filial and loyalty-filial ethics. 'Ill fortune' and 'calamity' draw on the Zuo Zhuan's 'heaven sends disaster' and the Documents' 'mournful, O little one,' and 'early met calamity' echoes the Songs' 'alas, my parents, who toiled to bear me,' lending private grief the weight of canon. 'The loving father left my back' uses the passive 'see' for 'was left by,' with the Songs' 'no father, what shelter' in its orphan's note. 'The uncle forced my mother's will' touches the remarriage ethics of 'husband dead, follow the son' — an in-law forcing the mother to remarry was a family tragedy, yet Li Mi states it without blame, showing self-restraint, against the rites' 'widow weeps not by night.' 'Grandmother Liu pitied my weakness, reared me herself' echoes the Songs' 'father gave me life, mother nursed me,' and the bond of grandparent and grandchild adds a two-fold pity of 'orphaned young, alone old.' The whole logic of repayment rests on Confucian 'filial care is the source of all conduct' — the Xiaojing's 'body, hair, skin, received from parents, dare not harm' becomes concrete 'reared me herself' and 'the days to repay her.' These make a private resignation a literary declaration of filial ethics.
《陈情表》的用典与传统文化内涵,深植于中国孝道与忠孝关系的伦理语境。其一,「险衅」「闵凶」之语,本于《左传》「天降之灾」与《尚书》「闵予小子」的忧患表达,「夙遭闵凶」暗合《诗经·小雅》「哀哀父母,生我劬劳」的丧亲之痛,以经典语汇写自身遭际,使私情获得经典的分量。其二,「慈父见背」化用「见」字的被动用法,本于先秦文献「见背」即弃我而去之意,语带《诗经》「无父何怙」的孤子哀音。其三,「舅夺母志」涉及古代「夫死从子」之外的再嫁伦理:舅氏迫母改嫁,在封建礼教中是家庭悲剧,李密写来不怨不恨,只作陈述,反显其克己的教养,与《礼记》「寡妇不夜哭」的守节语境相映。其四,「祖母刘悯臣孤弱,躬亲抚养」暗合《诗经》「父兮生我,母兮鞠我」的养育之恩,而祖孙相养又不同于母子,更添一层「幼而孤、老而独」的双向悲悯。其五,全篇的报恩逻辑根植于儒家「孝为百行之源」的观念,《孝经》「身体发肤,受之父母,不敢毁伤」的孝道本体,在李密笔下化为具体的「躬亲抚养」与「报养之日」。这些文化内涵使一篇辞官的私表,成为孝道伦理的文学宣言。
Commentary
The Memorial on Filial Feeling has been recited through ages, far beyond a document, the model of Chinese filial literature. The Jin Shu records Jin Wudi reading it: 'A scholar famed is not vainly so!' — he granted the request and sent two servants and provisions for the grandmother. Later it entered the Wen Xuan and the Guwen Guanzhi, ranked with Zhuge Liang's Chu Shi Biao as twin jewels of ministers' feeling — ancients said 'he who reads the Chu Shi without weeping is not loyal; he who reads the Chen Qing without weeping is not filial.' In form it founded the 'feeling against command' tradition: Han memorials stated policy, from Wei-Jin some spoke private feeling to the throne, Li Mi first; later Han Yu's Dirge for the Twelfth Nephew and Gui Youguang's Xiangji Xu Zhi inherit its blood. In thought, 'filial first, loyalty after' eased the ancient scholar's greatest conflict — loyalty and filial cannot both — with a feeling-and-reason solution influencing countless later choices. In schools it stays a model of parallel-prose moved by feeling.
《陈情表》自问世起即为历代传诵的名篇,其影响远超公文范畴,成为中国孝道文学的典范。据《晋书·李密传》载,晋武帝司马炎读表后「览之曰:『士之有名,不虚然哉!』」,不仅准其所请,更赐奴婢二人、令郡县供其祖母膳食——一篇奏章能打动开国君主至此,可见其情辞之力。此后此文历代入选文选、古文选本:萧统《文选》收录之,清人吴楚材、吴调侯《古文观止》亦录之,与诸葛亮《出师表》并列为臣子情文的双璧,古人合称「读《出师表》不哭者不忠,读《陈情表》不哭者不孝」。就文体史而言,此文确立了「以情抗命」的奏疏传统:汉代奏疏多陈政事,魏晋以来始有以私情动君之文,李密此表开其端,后世韩愈《祭十二郎文》、归有光《项脊轩志》的抒情散文皆受其血脉滋养。就思想史而言,「先尽孝、后尽忠」的申述,调和了忠孝冲突这一古代士人的最大困境,为「忠孝不能两全」提供了情理兼备的解决范式,影响及于此后无数士大夫的人生抉择。现代以来,此文长期入选中学语文教材,作为骈散结合、以情动人的写作范本,其「报恩」母题仍具普遍感染力。
Prosody
Line by line
臣密言:臣以险衅,夙遭闵凶。
Your servant Mi declares: your servant, by ill fortune and ill omen, early met sorrow and calamity. (The fixed opening of a memorial, 'your servant Mi declares' sets the ruler-subject line at once, padding the later bold plea to resign; 'by ill fortune' confesses a fated hard road, 'early met calamity' says the woe came young — cause then effect, total then particular, raising the banner of the whole passage's grief.)
臣李密上言:臣因命运坎坷多难,早年就遭逢忧患与凶丧之事。
I, Mi, speak: I have been beset by perils and misfortunes from my earliest years.
开篇六字「臣以险衅,夙遭闵凶」,是全篇悲苦基调的总纲。「臣密言」是表的固定起式,依奏疏礼法自称,一开口便君臣分明,为后文「以孝辞官」的冒昧恳求预作身份铺垫。「以险衅」三字自陈命途多舛——「险」言命运之艰险,「衅」本指血祭之隙、引申为罪咎与祸端,二字连用,写尽人生道路上的凶险裂隙;「夙遭闵凶」则点明这些祸患来得极早——「夙」即早,「闵」通悯、忧病之意,「凶」指丧事,四字如泣如诉。值得注意的是全句的时态层次:先说命之「险衅」(先天),再说遭之「闵凶」(后天),由因及果、由总及分,为下文「生孩六月,慈父见背」的具体叙述立起纲目。语言上六字而两用「之」前的四字结构,节奏短促,如一声长叹之后接连两声呜咽,正是悲苦之情的声气形态。
The opening. I, Mi, speak: I have been beset by perils and misfortunes from my earliest years. The memorial's formal opening, then the perils from earliest years, set the petition's grief. To have said his life was unfortunate from the start would be a confession; the subject-says-the-peril-and-trouble-from-earliest-years is the confession.
生孩六月,慈父见背;行年四岁,舅夺母志。
At six months born, the loving father left my back; at four years of age, the uncle forced my mother's will. (Two four-character antitheses compress Li Mi's two cruelest early blows — father's death and mother's loss. 'Six months' and 'four years' are frighteningly short, the more the pain; 'loving father left back' uses the passive 'see' for a gentle euphemism for death, the word 'loving' full of a child's yearning; 'uncle forced mother's will' hides pity for the mother, written without blame, showing his breeding.)
臣出生才六个月,慈父就离我而去;长到四岁,舅父又逼迫母亲改嫁,夺去了母亲守节的志向。
When I was six months old, my kind father left me; at four, my uncle forced my mother's remarriage.
这两句以两个四字对句,浓缩了李密幼年最惨痛的两件事:丧父与失母。「生孩六月」与「行年四岁」两个时间状语极短促——六月、四岁,人生尚在襁褓与孩提之间,便已接连遭遇至亲离散,时间越短,愈见其苦。「慈父见背」以「见」字表被动,「见背」即背弃我而去,是古人对「死」的委婉说法,一个「慈」字饱含孺慕之思——父亲在世时的慈爱,唯存于记忆中,反衬「背」之痛切。「舅夺母志」四字最是沉痛:舅氏逼迫母亲改嫁,夺其守节之志,此处「夺」字既是叙述事实,又暗藏对母亲被迫改嫁的怜悯——母亲并非无情,而是势不得已,李密写来不带一句怨言,反见其胸襟与教养。两句对仗工整,「六月」对「四岁」、「见背」对「夺志」,短促的四字句如两记重锤,将人生的第一重悲剧砸在读者心上,为「祖母刘悯臣孤弱」的转笔蓄足力量。
The two losses. When I was six months old, my kind father left me; at four, my uncle forced my mother's remarriage. The father's death at six months and the mother's remarriage at four are the childhood's two disasters. To have said he lost his father and mother early would be a summary; the six-months-kind-father-left-me against the four-years-old-uncle-forced-mother's-remarriage is the summary.
祖母刘悯臣孤弱,躬亲抚养。
Grandmother Liu pitied your servant's orphaned weakness and reared me herself. (The turning point and footing of the whole feeling: after father and mother gone, only grandmother Liu sheltered him. 'Pitied my weakness' shows her mercy; 'reared me herself' shows her toil — 'herself' means no hand but hers. This line is the hinge: the earlier 'orphaned weakness' exists to lift this 'pity,' the later sickness exists to prove this 'rearing,' burying the seed of 'without grandmother no today.')
祖母刘氏怜悯臣孤苦弱小,亲自抚养臣长大。
My grandmother Liu, pitying my orphaned weakness, raised me with her own hands.
此句是全篇情感的转折点与立足点:父亲背弃、母亲改嫁之后,天地间唯一庇护李密的,便是祖母刘氏。「悯臣孤弱」四字,写祖母之慈:悯者,哀怜也;孤者,无父也;弱者,幼小无依也——三个字层层递进,写尽孙儿遭际之可怜,也写尽祖母见怜之必然。「躬亲抚养」四字,写祖母之劳:「躬亲」强调亲手、亲自,不假手于奴仆,可见老人在孙儿身上倾注的全部心力;「抚养」则涵盖衣食冷暖、病痛照拂的全过程。这一句在结构上是全篇的枢纽——前文写尽「孤弱」之悲,正为突出此处的「悯」;后文「臣少多疾病,九岁不行」之病弱,正为落实「抚养」之劳。祖孙相依的画面至此定格,后文「臣无祖母,无以至今日」的因果逻辑在此已埋下伏笔。一个「悯」字、一个「躬」字,将祖孙间无言的大爱凝于八字之中,是全篇最动人的笔墨之一。
The grandmother. My grandmother Liu, pitying my orphaned weakness, raised me with her own hands. The pity and the own-hands raising are the petition's whole point. To have said his grandmother raised him would be a fact; the grandmother-Liu-pitying-my-orphaned-weakness against the raising-with-her-own-hands is the fact.
臣少多疾病,九岁不行,零丁孤苦,至于成立。
Your servant was often sick in youth, at nine could not walk, lone and bitter, until grown to manhood. (Continuing 'reared me herself,' the sick child proves the grandmother's hardship. 'Often sick' then 'at nine could not walk' fixes the weakness; 'lone and bitter' are two binomes, low and turning like weeping; 'until grown' sweeps a dozen years in one breath, restrained and deep. By sickness showing toil, by toil showing feeling, it doubles the grounding for 'without me no end to her years.')
臣年少时体弱多病,九岁还不能行走,孤苦零丁,一直长到成年。
In childhood I was often ill; at nine I could not walk. Lonely and forlorn, I grew to manhood.
此句承接「躬亲抚养」,以自身的病弱反衬祖母养育之难,是全段情感的收束。「臣少多疾病」总写体质之弱,疾病二字涵盖幼年无数病痛;「九岁不行」以极具体的细节坐实「多疾病」——九岁尚不能行走,其病弱之甚、祖母照拂之劳,皆在不言之中。这两句写「我」之病,正是为了写「祖母」之辛:一个病弱到九岁不能行的孩子,要「躬亲抚养」到「成立」,其间艰辛可以想见。「零丁孤苦」四字连用两个双声叠韵词(零丁、孤苦),声调低回,如泣如诉,是骈文中极佳的声情结合——「零丁」本指孤身无依,「孤苦」兼言形单与心悲,四字写尽身世的全貌。「至于成立」以「至于」二字带出漫长岁月的流逝,仿佛将十几年寒暑一笔带过,愈见叙述的克制与情感的深沉。全句由病写辛、由辛见情,将「孤弱」与「抚养」的关系彻底坐实,为全表「祖母无臣,无以终余年」的恳请完成了情感与逻辑的双重铺垫。
The childhood. In childhood I was often ill; at nine I could not walk. Lonely and forlorn, I grew to manhood. The often-ill, the nine-years-old-not-walking, and the lonely-to-manhood, are the proof of the grandmother's labor. To have described a sickly childhood would be a summary; the often-ill-at-nine-could-not-walk against the lonely-forlorn-until-grown is the summary.
Study
Word focus
Related Reading
Zhuge Liang's Chu Shi Biao and Li Mi's Chen Qing Biao, one loyal one filial, are twin jewels of Chinese expressive public prose. They differ in feeling and tone: the Chu Shi repays the late Emperor's grace, all worry for state and ruler, earnest yet grand; the Chen Qing declines the new court's summons, all lone self-confession, humble and low. In scheme the Chu Shi leads with situation then claim, reason over feeling; the Chen Qing leads with birth then heart, feeling over reason. Both 'move by true feeling': both drop ornament, both pour the breast — the Chu Shi moves the ruler by 'cherishing the late Emperor's grace,' the Chen Qing by 'reared me herself,' both with real political effect. Ancients said 'he who reads the Chu Shi without weeping is not loyal; he who reads the Chen Qing without weeping is not filial.'
诸葛亮《出师表》与李密《陈情表》一忠一孝,并称中国公牍抒情散文的双璧。差异在情感取向与行文语气:出师表报先帝知遇之恩,通篇忧国忧君,语气恳切而气度宏阔;陈情表辞新朝征召之命,通篇自陈孤苦,语气卑微而哀音低回。章法亦各有胜场:出师表先陈形势后申主张,以理驭情;陈情表先陈身世后述衷肠,以情驭理。相通处在于「以真情感人」:两表皆弃藻饰、摅胸臆,出师表以「追先帝之殊遇」的忠打动君主,陈情表以「躬亲抚养」的孝打动君主,皆收到了实际的政治效果——晋武帝读陈情表而准其请、赐其食,正与刘备托孤时武侯泣血相应。古人谓「读《出师表》不哭者不忠,读《陈情表》不哭者不孝」,二表遂成为中国文人忠孝精神的文字图腾。
祭十二郎文 祭十二郎文 韩愈 · 同为写骨肉至情、以情动人的抒情名篇 Related readingCompare this related work with the poem above through theme, imagery, tone, and emotional movement.
韩愈《祭十二郎文》是唐代祭悼散文的绝唱,与《陈情表》相隔四百余年而情感同源。差异在文体与叙述重心:陈情表是上给君主的奏疏,须在陈情中兼顾君臣礼法,故自抑而含蓄;祭十二郎文是写给亡侄的祭文,无须任何身份顾虑,故放笔直书、声泪俱下,是「不暇修饰」的至情之文。相通处在于「以情立文」:陈情表写祖母躬亲抚养之恩,祭文写叔侄相依为命之情,皆从最寻常的骨肉琐事中写出血肉至情;且两文都善于以「重复」增情——李密反复言「孤弱」「抚养」,韩愈反复言「汝」「吾」,如泣如诉,一唱三叹。清人评祭文「通篇情真语挚,无一字虚设」,移评《陈情表》亦当。二文并读,可见中国散文「情真则文至」的抒情传统。
项脊轩志 项脊轩志 归有光 · 同为以家常琐事写深挚亲情的抒情散文 Related readingCompare this related work with the poem above through theme, imagery, tone, and emotional movement.
归有光《项脊轩志》是明代抒情散文名篇,与《陈情表》精神相通而笔法各异。差异在时代与表达:陈情表是骈散结合的奏疏,以四字短句的声情与卑抑的措辞写悲;项脊轩志是纯粹的散体小品,以「庭有枇杷树,吾妻死之年所手植也,今已亭亭如盖矣」这样近乎口语的白描写情,平淡之中见深痛。相通处在于「小事见真情」:李密以「生孩六月」「九岁不行」的具体遭际写祖母之恩,归有光以老妪转述母亲「儿寒乎?欲食乎」的寻常问话写慈母之爱,皆弃宏大叙事,从最细微处落笔,反而愈见真切。二文又一共同处在于「至情不假修饰」:无论是骈是散,皆以真情感人,故能流传千古。合观可见,中国抒情散文「以真为美」的传统,从魏晋的公牍到明清的性灵小品,一脉相承。